Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Tianjin Teda: match statistics
Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Tianjin Teda: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chongqing Tongliang Long played Tianjin Teda in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Chongqing Tongliang Long: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Tianjin Teda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.27 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Tianjin Teda scores 1.27 and concedes 1.40. League average: 3.06 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chongqing Tongliang Long 53%, Tianjin Teda 67%. Over 2.5: Chongqing Tongliang Long 40%, Tianjin Teda 53%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Tianjin Teda has higher xG: 1.03 vs 0.97. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 8.3 shots per match, Tianjin Teda: 9.1.
Match halves
Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. Tianjin Teda: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Chongqing Tongliang Long: 61-75 (5 goals). Tianjin Teda: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.06 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chongqing Tongliang Long sit 2nd with a record of 6-6-3 and 19 scored vs 16 conceded; Tianjin Teda are 16th (3-6-6) also with 19 goals for but 21 against. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 6 goals, won 2 and average 1.4 points per game, while the visitors scored 5, won 1 and average 1.0 point per game. At home Chongqing records 55% possession, on average 10.13 shots and 4.0 on target per match, a 15% conversion rate and xG 1.17; Tianjin away have 38% possession, 9.86 shots and 3.71 on target, 14% conversion and xG 1.06. The key advantage for the hosts is defence and the quality of chances allowed: at home they concede 1.13 goals on average with xG against 0.99 and 38% clean sheets, whereas the visitors away concede 1.29 goals on average, 1.83 xG against and only 14% clean sheets, and in 29% of away matches the visitors fail to score (vs 13% for the home side). Considering 2nd vs 16th, clear superiority in possession, lower xG against and a smaller share of matches without scoring, I tip a home win; proposed probabilities: home 62%, draw 24%, away 14%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 75% for Chongqing and 57% for Tianjin, versus a league average of 63%, providing an initial signal in favor of BTTS. In the last 5 matches the home side has BTTS in 40% of games, while the away side is at 80%, so recent form more strongly supports both teams scoring. xG shows the home team creates 1.01 xG and concedes 1.32 xG, while the visitors create 1.06 xG and concede 1.83 xG — notably the 1.83 xG against Tianjin increases the likelihood that the home side will score, whereas the 1.32 xG against Chongqing gives the visitors a chance to score. Additionally, clean sheets are only 25% for the home team and 14% for the visitors, and average shots/shots on target are 8.5/3.0 (home) vs 9.86/3.71 (away), confirming offensive potential on both sides. Considering the teams' average BTTS (~66%), the high xG against the visitors and low clean sheet percentages, I assess BTTS probability at 72% vs 28% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' stake.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals from xG: home side have xG for 1.01, visitors 1.06; xG against are 1.83 for Tianjin and 1.32 for Chongqing — averaging these pairs gives 1.42 goals for Chongqing and 1.19 for Tianjin, totaling 2.61. Season shares of matches over 1.5 goals are 75% for Chongqing and 86% for Tianjin (avg ~80.5%), which, given the expected total of 2.61, strongly favors Over 1.5. The 2.5 line is less clear: home have 63% of matches >2.5, visitors 43% (avg 53%), and the league average Over 2.5 is 57% — our expected 2.61 minimally exceeds the 2.5 threshold, giving a moderate edge to Over 2.5. Additionally, the BTTS rates are 75% vs 57%, average shots on target are 3.0 (home) and 3.71 (away), and in the last 5 matches the home scored 6 goals, the away 5 (avg 1.2 and 1.0), which supports a both-teams-to-score scenario. As a result I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (model: Over 1.5 = 82% vs Under 1.5 = 18%), while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~19%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I expect a draw at half-time: the home side drew at the break in 63% of matches and the away side in 57%, with first-half goal averages of 0.88 for Chongqing and 0.86 for Tianjin (7 and 6 first-half goals respectively), indicating a low first-half tempo. Most goals come after the break — 75% of the home team’s matches and 86% of the away team’s matches have at least one goal in the second half, and second-half goal averages are 1.75 (home) versus 1.86 (away), suggesting decisive action after half-time. Tianjin show superior season metrics: 1.29 points per game versus 0.75 for the hosts and a 29% win rate compared to 13% for the hosts, so they have a higher chance of the final victory. Additionally, the hosts have a high percentage of matches with both teams scoring (75% for the home side and 57% for the away side), which increases the likelihood of goals after the break and a turnaround. On this basis the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and an away win at full-time, so I select X/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Tianjin Teda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.07 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.4 goals / match - Tianjin Teda
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Tianjin Teda keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
Tianjin Teda scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Over / Under - Tianjin Teda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tianjin Teda is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.4 pts / match - Tianjin Teda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tianjin Teda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chongqing Tongliang Long
Tianjin Teda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Liga | Tianjin Teda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.33 | 3.06 | ▼ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 60% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 20% | • 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 69% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 87% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Chongqing Tongliang Long 0 - 1 - 0 Tianjin Teda. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Tianjin Teda?
The Chinese Super League match finished Chongqing Tongliang Long 1:0 Tianjin Teda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Tianjin Teda?
Chongqing Tongliang Long score 1.27 goals per game on average and Tianjin Teda 1.27. The Chinese Super League average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's matches and 67% of Tianjin Teda's.
What form are Chongqing Tongliang Long and Tianjin Teda in?
Over the last 5 games Chongqing Tongliang Long have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tianjin Teda 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Tianjin Teda?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.