Chrobry Głogów vs Ruch Chorzów: match statistics
Chrobry Głogów vs Ruch Chorzów: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chrobry Głogów played Ruch Chorzów in 1. Liga (Poland). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Chrobry Głogów: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Ruch Chorzów: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chrobry Głogów scores 1.46 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. Ruch Chorzów scores 1.54 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.97 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chrobry Głogów 54%, Ruch Chorzów 69%. Over 2.5: Chrobry Głogów 54%, Ruch Chorzów 65%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Chrobry Głogów has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.59. Chrobry Głogów: 13.8 shots per match, Ruch Chorzów: 13.8.
Match halves
Chrobry Głogów: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.96. Ruch Chorzów: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Chrobry Głogów: 76-90+ (12 goals). Ruch Chorzów: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chrobry Głogów has a clear home advantage: the hosts score an average of 1.54 goals per home match and concede 1.00, while Ruch averages 1.15 goals scored and concedes 1.54 on the road. Quality of chances favors Chrobry — hosts’ average xG is 1.79 versus Ruch’s 1.53 xG away (difference 0.26), and shots on target are 5.38 vs 4.00. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 8 goals each, but Ruch has a slightly better points run (2.0 points per match vs 1.8 for Chrobry) and a 3-1-1 record compared to the hosts’ 3-0-2. A key trend is goal difference: Chrobry +7 at home versus Ruch -5 away; additionally Ruch wins only 23% of away games and records 46% draws, which increases the probability of a home win. Based on this I estimate probabilities of 58% for Chrobry, 22% for a draw and 20% for a Ruch win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "Both Teams To Score" scenario is strongly supported by seasonal metrics: Chrobry has BTTS in 77% of matches, Ruch in 62%, and the league average is 66%. Chrobry averages 1.92 goals per game (xG 1.65) with 38 scored and 25 conceded this season, while Ruch averages 1.15 goals and has 40 scored and 36 conceded, indicating greater susceptibility of Ruch to concede. Looking at xG, Chrobry has xG_for 1.65, Ruch away concedes on average 1.76 xG, while Ruch creates xG_for 1.53 — this shows both teams generate and allow scoring chances. In the last 5 matches both sides had BTTS at 60% and each scored 8 goals, conceding 5 and 6 respectively; additionally Chrobry averages 14.62 shots with 4.08 on target (conversion 13%), and Ruch 13.0 with 4.0 on target (conversion 9%), which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Based on this I assign a 72% probability to BTTS - Yes and 28% to No Goal; recommendation: yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast based on xG and form yields an expected total of 3.18 goals: Chrobry 1.71 (xG 1.65 vs xG conceded to Ruch 1.76) and Ruch 1.47 (xG 1.53 vs xG conceded to Chrobry 1.40). This translates to a very high probability of Over 1.5 — Chrobry at home has 100% of matches with more than 1.5 goals, Ruch 69%, and the league averages 2.97 goals per match; additionally Chrobry scores 1.92 goals at home with 14.62 shots and 13% conversion, while Ruch averages 13.0 shots and 9% conversion. At the 2.5 line the signals are also strong: Chrobry has 77% of matches >2.5, Ruch 54%, and in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 occurred for home teams in 80% and for away teams in 60%, hence I estimate the chance of Over 2.5 at approximately 70%. For the 3.5 line the stats are less clear (seasonally 31% for Chrobry and 38% for Ruch) and the predicted 3.18 goals is below 3.5, so Under 3.5 appears more likely (~66%). In summary, I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal: Chrobry’s 100% home record over 1.5 combined with a high share of matches where both teams scored (77% for home, 62% for away) supports a scenario with at least 2 goals in this fixture.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast 1/1 (Chrobry leading at the break and winning) because Chrobry averages 1.92 goals per match versus Ruch’s 1.15 and led at the break in 46% of their games. Additionally, Chrobry scores an average of 1.08 goals before half-time compared to Ruch’s 0.62 and has an overall win rate of 62% versus only 23% for the visitors, which increases the likelihood of maintaining the lead. xG metrics also favor the hosts: Chrobry’s xG is 1.65 versus Ruch’s 1.53, while expected xG against are 1.40 for Chrobry and 1.76 for the visitors, suggesting better home defense. Based on these data I distributed the probability mass — 36% on 1/1, 15% on a half-time draw and home win (X/1), and 11% on a draw at half-time and full-time (X/X) — assuming a half-time draw for the hosts occurs in 31% of matches. Low probabilities for scenarios in which Ruch leads at the break stem from the fact that the visitors led at half-time in only 23% of games, and their shot conversion is 9% versus 13% for the hosts, which explains allocating 13% to 2/2 and 5% to 2/X.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chrobry Głogów | Ruch Chorzów | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ruch Chorzów is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Chrobry Głogów · 2 pts / match - Ruch Chorzów
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ruch Chorzów is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.46 goals / match - Chrobry Głogów · 1.54 goals / match - Ruch Chorzów
Chrobry Głogów is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.96 goals / match - Chrobry Głogów · 1.38 goals / match - Ruch Chorzów
Chrobry Głogów scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Ruch Chorzów keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).
Ruch Chorzów scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Chrobry Głogów keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chrobry Głogów
Over / Under - Ruch Chorzów
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ruch Chorzów is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.35 pts / match - Chrobry Głogów · 1.54 pts / match - Ruch Chorzów
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chrobry Głogów - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ruch Chorzów - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chrobry Głogów
Ruch Chorzów
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Chrobry Głogów | Liga | Ruch Chorzów | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.42 | 2.97 | • 2.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 66% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 61% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 19% | ▲ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 74% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 79% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Chrobry Głogów 0 - 0 - 1 Ruch Chorzów. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chrobry Głogów vs Ruch Chorzów?
The 1. Liga match finished Chrobry Głogów 1:1 Ruch Chorzów. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chrobry Głogów vs Ruch Chorzów?
Chrobry Głogów score 1.46 goals per game on average and Ruch Chorzów 1.54. The 1. Liga average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Chrobry Głogów's matches and 69% of Ruch Chorzów's.
What form are Chrobry Głogów and Ruch Chorzów in?
Over the last 5 games Chrobry Głogów have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Ruch Chorzów 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chrobry Głogów vs Ruch Chorzów?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


