Croatia - Druga HNLData current as of 07 September 2026

Cibalia vs Jarun: match statistics

Cibalia crest
Cibalia
3 : 1half-time 1:1
Jarun crest
Jarun
165%(1.58)
X25%(3.65)
210%(6.20)

Cibalia is showing significantly better form, winning four of their last five matches and holding a high 4th position in the table. The hosts are extremely effective at home, winning 50% of their home matches with only 13% defeats and keeping a clean sheet in half of the games. Jarun, on the other hand, has not won a single away match this season (0% wins), losing as many as 67% of their away fixtures and conceding an average of 1.67 goals per match. The difference in goal difference is clear: Cibalia has +6 at home, while Jarun has -9 away. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.54 vs 1.12), and the advantage in possession (54% vs 45%) as well as shot accuracy (13% vs 8%) further confirm Cibalia's clear superiority in this matchup.

Cibalia vs Jarun: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cibalia played Jarun in Druga HNL (Croatia). The match was played on 22 February 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Cibalia: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Jarun: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cibalia scores 1.22 and concedes 0.78 goals per match. Jarun scores 1.00 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cibalia 33%, Jarun 56%. Over 2.5: Cibalia 33%, Jarun 33%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Cibalia has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.13. Cibalia: 9.7 shots per match, Jarun: 8.6.

Match halves

Cibalia: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.89. Jarun: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.44.

Goals by minute

Cibalia: 61-75 (9 goals). Jarun: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Druga HNL: 2.13 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cibalia is showing significantly better form, winning four of their last five matches and holding a high 4th position in the table. The hosts are extremely effective at home, winning 50% of their home matches with only 13% defeats and keeping a clean sheet in half of the games. Jarun, on the other hand, has not won a single away match this season (0% wins), losing as many as 67% of their away fixtures and conceding an average of 1.67 goals per match. The difference in goal difference is clear: Cibalia has +6 at home, while Jarun has -9 away. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.54 vs 1.12), and the advantage in possession (54% vs 45%) as well as shot accuracy (13% vs 8%) further confirm Cibalia's clear superiority in this matchup.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

72Possession (%)28
CibaliaJarun
11Shots4
CibaliaJarun
5Shots on target1
CibaliaJarun
1.98xG0.62
CibaliaJarun
8Corners2
CibaliaJarun
128Dangerous attacks39
CibaliaJarun
-1Fouls-1
CibaliaJarun
1Cards3
CibaliaJarun

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match1
CibaliaJarun
0.78Goals conceded / match1.22
CibaliaJarun
50%Average possession46%
CibaliaJarun
3.44Shots on target / match3.22
CibaliaJarun

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.72Shots per match8.61
CibaliaJarun
3.44Shots on target3.22
CibaliaJarun
12.6%Shot conversion11.6%
CibaliaJarun
50%Possession46%
CibaliaJarun
1.4xG for1.13
CibaliaJarun
1.28xG against1.48
CibaliaJarun

Shooting quality

Cibalia: BalancedJarun: Balanced
CibaliaJarun
Accuracy (shots on target)35%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cibalia is 150% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Cibalia · 1.2 pts / match - Jarun

Cibalia
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
50% W28% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-4
1.78 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Jarun
WDDDL
Season result split
22% W39% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-7
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cibalia is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Cibalia · 1 goals / match - Jarun

Cibalia is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.78 goals / match - Cibalia · 1.22 goals / match - Jarun

Cibalia scoring profile: very strong

Cibalia scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Jarun keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

Jarun scoring profile: mixed

Jarun scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Cibalia keeps a clean sheet in 56% (10 of 18 matches).

22Goals scored (season)18
CibaliaJarun
14Goals conceded (season)22
CibaliaJarun
2Average goals in match2.22
CibaliaJarun
11Goals scored (last 5)5
CibaliaJarun
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
CibaliaJarun

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal67%
CibaliaJarun
33%2 goals28%
CibaliaJarun
11%3 goals6%
CibaliaJarun
6%4 goals0%
CibaliaJarun

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal83%
CibaliaJarun
28%2 goals33%
CibaliaJarun
6%3 goals6%
CibaliaJarun
0%4 goals0%
CibaliaJarun

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time17%
CibaliaJarun
6%BTTS in both halves0%
CibaliaJarun
11%Scored in both halves17%
CibaliaJarun

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
CibaliaJarun
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CibaliaJarun
20%BTTS - last 560%
CibaliaJarun

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
CibaliaJarun
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
CibaliaJarun
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
CibaliaJarun

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
CibaliaJarun
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
CibaliaJarun
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
CibaliaJarun

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jarun is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Cibalia · 1.61 pts / match - Jarun

Cibalia - half-time state
22% leading44% draw33% trailing
Jarun - half-time state
39% leading44% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1.61
CibaliaJarun
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.56
CibaliaJarun
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
CibaliaJarun
0.83Average goals (1st half)1
CibaliaJarun
61%Clean sheet before half-time72%
CibaliaJarun
67%No goal before half-time56%
CibaliaJarun

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per match (2nd half)0.94
CibaliaJarun
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
CibaliaJarun
0.28Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
CibaliaJarun
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.22
CibaliaJarun
78%Clean sheet after half-time39%
CibaliaJarun
50%No goal after half-time61%
CibaliaJarun

Cibalia - second-half results

44% W50% R6% P
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding227%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jarun - second-half results

17% W44% R39% P
29
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding56%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 22%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cibalia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+7
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Jarun - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.21.8
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cibalia
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
5
2
46-60
9
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Jarun
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
0
7
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.11
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cibalia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Jarun

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 28% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).

Teams vs league

CibaliaLigaJarun
Average goals in match 2.002.13 2.22
Both teams scored 33%41% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%36% 33%
Clean sheets 56%34% 17%
Goal before half-time 61%62% 56%
Goal after half-time 56%73% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.13
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
0.86
Away goals / match
+48%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JarunYellow cardTomislav Grdenić
  2. CibaliaGoalGabrijel Boban
  3. CibaliaSubstitutionOn: Ivo VukićOff: Petar Brlek
  4. JarunSubstitutionOn: Denis HodakOff: Tomislav Grdenić
  5. JarunYellow cardBorna Orlić
  6. JarunSubstitutionOn: Roko PerosOff: Nick Ocvirek
  7. JarunYellow cardVilim Krušlin
  8. CibaliaGoalGabrijel Boban
  9. CibaliaYellow cardDavid Žabec
  10. JarunSubstitutionOn: Vanja VukmanovićOff: Fran Čuljak
  11. CibaliaSubstitutionOn: Petar MišićOff: David Žabec

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Cibalia 0 - 0 - 1 Jarun. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

NK Jarun Zagreb
2 : 1
HNK Cibalia Vinkovci

FAQ

What was the result of Cibalia vs Jarun?

The Druga HNL match finished Cibalia 3:1 Jarun. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cibalia vs Jarun?

Cibalia score 1.22 goals per game on average and Jarun 1.00. The Druga HNL average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Cibalia's matches and 56% of Jarun's.

What form are Cibalia and Jarun in?

Over the last 5 games Cibalia have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Jarun 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cibalia vs Jarun?

The statistical background for Cibalia vs Jarun — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.