Cibalia vs Orijent 1919: match statistics
Cibalia vs Orijent 1919: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cibalia played Orijent 1919 in Druga HNL (Croatia). The match was played on 23 May 2026. Venue: Stadion Cibalia. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Cibalia: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Orijent 1919: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cibalia scores 1.52 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Orijent 1919 scores 1.13 and concedes 1.23. League average: 2.30 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cibalia 48%, Orijent 1919 52%. Over 2.5: Cibalia 52%, Orijent 1919 35%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Orijent 1919 has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.39. Cibalia: 9.5 shots per match, Orijent 1919: 11.0.
Match halves
Cibalia: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.84. Orijent 1919: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Cibalia: 61-75 (13 goals). Orijent 1919: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Druga HNL: 2.30 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1): Cibalia sit 4th and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 10 goals in that span, while Orijent are 10th with just 1 win in their last 5 and 2 goals scored. Offensively the hosts are more effective at home — Cibalia average 1.87 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.51 and shot conversion rate of 18%, whereas Orijent on the road average only 1.06 goals per match with xG 1.46 and a 9% conversion rate. Defensively Cibalia concede only 0.67 goals per home match (opponent xG 1.22), while Orijent concede 1.38 goals away (opponent xG 1.28), giving the hosts a clear advantage in game control. Cibalia control matches at home with 56% possession and 4.2 shots on target per game, keep clean sheets in 53% of matches and fail to score in only 13% of games, while Orijent average 49% possession, 4 shots on target and as many as 44% of away games without a goal. Considering form (2.4 points on average in the last 5 for Cibalia vs 0.8 for Orijent), superior efficiency and a more stable defense, I assess the probability of a home win at 72%, a draw at 18% and an away win at 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Cibalia has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% and 60% in the last 5 matches, while Orijent 1919 records 38% for the season and only 20% in the last 5. Cibalia averages 1.2 goals per game for the season (2.0 in the last 5) and concedes 1.07 seasonally (1.0 in the last 5), whereas Orijent scores 1.06 goals for the season (0.4 in the last 5) and concedes 1.38 seasonally (1.4 in the last 5). Both teams generate similar season xG: 1.43 for Cibalia vs 1.46 for Orijent, and xG conceded of 1.11 vs 1.28, which indicates chances created at both ends. Orijent failed to score in 44% of matches this season and has lower finishing efficiency (conversion 9% vs Cibalia’s 12%), but Cibalia has only 13% clean sheets and scored 10 goals in the last 5, increasing the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering the stronger home signal (67% BTTS and 2.0 goals in the last 5) and comparable xG profiles, I favor the BTTS scenario: 60% 'Yes' vs 40% 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.36 expected goals for Cibalia (xG for = 1.43 vs Orijent’s average conceded 1.28) and 1.29 for Orijent (xG for = 1.46 vs Cibalia’s average conceded 1.11), totaling 2.65 expected goals. Season-long metrics show Cibalia scores 1.2 and concedes 1.07 per match, while Orijent scores 1.06 and concedes 1.38, indicating a 2–3 goals outcome. The 1.5 line is strongly supported: 67% of Cibalia’s matches and 75% of Orijent’s matches finish Over 1.5, so I assign an 85% probability to Over 1.5. Signals for 2.5 are mixed: season Over 2.5 rates are 20% for the home side and 50% for the away side, but in Cibalia’s last 5 matches the rate is 60% versus Orijent’s 20%; combining this with xG=2.65 gives a moderate edge to Over 2.5 (55%). The 3.5 line is unlikely—season Over 3.5 occurs in 20% and 25% of matches respectively, and expected 2.65 goals is well below 3.5—therefore I assign a 78% probability to Under 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Cibalia provides the strongest signal for taking the lead at the break and securing the win: in the last 5 matches the home side have won 4 times (80%) and led at Half-Time in 4 of 5 fixtures (80%), with an average of 1.6 first-half goals versus 0.2 for Orijent. Seasonally Cibalia scores 1.2 goals per match compared to Orijent’s 1.06, while the visitors concede 1.38 goals per game on average versus the hosts’ 1.07, indicating an advantage in finishing chances. Both teams’ xG are similar (1.43 vs 1.46), but Cibalia’s finishing rate of 12% compared to Orijent’s 9% and Cibalia’s 11 first-half goals in the last 5 matches versus Orijent’s 5 further support the expectation that the hosts will lead at the break. Draws occur frequently (47% of home matches end level this season), but current form and first-half goal numbers point to a 1/1 (HT/FT) scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cibalia | Orijent 1919 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cibalia is 200% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Cibalia · 0.8 pts / match - Orijent 1919
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cibalia is 35% better for: goals scored per match.
1.52 goals / match - Cibalia · 1.13 goals / match - Orijent 1919
Cibalia is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.97 goals / match - Cibalia · 1.23 goals / match - Orijent 1919
Cibalia scores in 84% of matches (26 of 31 matches), while Orijent 1919 keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 31 matches).
Orijent 1919 scores in 68% of matches (21 of 31 matches), while Cibalia keeps a clean sheet in 45% (14 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cibalia
Over / Under - Orijent 1919
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cibalia is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.52 pts / match - Cibalia · 1.23 pts / match - Orijent 1919
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cibalia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Orijent 1919 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cibalia
Orijent 1919
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).
Teams vs league
| Cibalia | Liga | Orijent 1919 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.48 | 2.30 | • 2.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 43% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 42% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 32% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 68% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 75% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Cibalia 1 - 0 - 1 Orijent 1919. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cibalia vs Orijent 1919?
The Druga HNL match finished Cibalia 3:2 Orijent 1919. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cibalia and Orijent 1919?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cibalia won 1, Orijent 1919 won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cibalia vs Orijent 1919?
Cibalia score 1.52 goals per game on average and Orijent 1919 1.13. The Druga HNL average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Cibalia's matches and 52% of Orijent 1919's.
What form are Cibalia and Orijent 1919 in?
Over the last 5 games Cibalia have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Orijent 1919 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cibalia vs Orijent 1919?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cibalia vs Orijent 1919: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.