Ciudad de Bolívar vs Ferro Carril Oeste: match statistics
Ciudad de Bolívar vs Ferro Carril Oeste: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ciudad de Bolívar played Ferro Carril Oeste in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 2:4.
Current form
Ciudad de Bolívar: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Ferro Carril Oeste: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ciudad de Bolívar scores 0.70 and concedes 0.20 goals per match. Ferro Carril Oeste scores 0.70 and concedes 0.80. League average: 1.81 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ciudad de Bolívar 20%, Ferro Carril Oeste 30%. Over 2.5: Ciudad de Bolívar 0%, Ferro Carril Oeste 10%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Ferro Carril Oeste has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.04. Ciudad de Bolívar: 8.3 shots per match, Ferro Carril Oeste: 12.2.
Match halves
Ciudad de Bolívar: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.40. Ferro Carril Oeste: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Ciudad de Bolívar: 76-90+ (2 goals). Ferro Carril Oeste: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Prim B Nacional: 1.81 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw because Ciudad de Bolívar possess a very solid home defense — conceding just 0.25 goals per game on average and keeping clean sheets in 75% of matches — but have limited attacking output: only 0.5 goals scored per home game and failing to score in 50% of fixtures. Ferro Carril Oeste average 1.0 goals on the road, register 2.67 shots on target per away match and display roughly 10% higher conversion efficiency, with only 17% of games without a goal, so they have a realistic chance to score. xG comparison shows a similar volume of chances (xG 1.3 for the home side at home vs 1.19 for the visitors away), but Ciudad de Bolívar do not convert xG into goals (1.3 xG vs 0.5 average goals), which increases the probability of a draw. In the last 5 matches the hosts have 3 wins and 2 draws (2.2 points per game on average), while the visitors have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses (1.4 points per game), indicating better form for the hosts but also a tendency to share points. Given the low combined average goals in the hosts’ matches (0.75) and the balanced xG metrics, I propose the probability distribution: home 35%, draw 40%, away 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis indicates a clear lean toward No Goal (BTTS - No): Ciudad de Bolívar has 25% of matches with BTTS, Ferro 33%, averaging 29% versus the league level of 36%. In the last 5 meetings the BTTS rate for both teams is 0% (0.0% and 0.0%), highlighting a strong short-term trend of no Goal/Goal outcomes. Offensive data confirm a low chance of a home goal: their xG is 1.75, but actual average output is only 0.25 goals per match with a conversion rate of 2%. Ferro concedes on average 0.5 goals per match and keeps a clean sheet in 67% of games, while the whole league has 83% of matches with a clean sheet, which raises the likelihood of single-sided scorelines with No Goal. Given these figures (0.25 scored by the home side, 67% opponent clean sheets and 0% BTTS in the last 5), I recommend BTTS - No with an estimated probability of 80% versus 20% for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistics point to a low-goals affair: Ciudad de Bolívar scores 0.25 goals per match this season vs. 1.00 for Ferro, giving a combined seasonal scoring average of 1.25. Although the home xG is 1.75 vs. 1.19 for Ferro, the home side’s low conversion rate (2% vs. 10% for the visitors) indicates chances are poorly finished. Ferro keeps a clean sheet in 67% of matches and concedes just 0.5 goals seasonally; seasonal Over 2.5 is 0% for the home team and 17% for the visitors, so Over 2.5 outcomes are rare. Considering the last 5 matches (xG 1.25 for the home side and 1.32 for the visitors) and the league average of 1.78, I estimate expected goals of 0.70 (home) and 0.75 (away), total 1.45, which translates to roughly an 18% chance of Over 2.5. For these reasons I recommend an Under 2.5 wager as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical facts favor the visitors: Ferro averages 1.0 goal scored and concedes 0.5 per match, has a 50% win rate and 1.83 points per game, whereas Ciudad de Bolívar scores only 0.25 goals and concedes 1.25, has no wins and averages 0.25 points per match. At half-time Ciudad de Bolívar were trailing in 4 out of 4 home matches (100%), averaging 1.0 goals conceded and 0.0 scored, which significantly increases the likelihood of the visitors holding the lead at the break. Although the home side produces higher xG (1.75 vs 1.19), their chance conversion rate is just 2.0% compared to Ferro’s 10.0%, translating into Ciudad’s very low goal-scoring efficiency (0.25 goals per match). The visitors also score more often after the break (0.83 vs 0.25) and maintain a high clean sheet percentage (67% on the season and 83% at half-time), therefore the scenario of the visitors leading at half-time and winning by full-time (2/2) is considered the most probable.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ciudad de Bolívar | Ferro Carril Oeste | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ciudad de Bolívar is 57% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Ciudad de Bolívar · 1.4 pts / match - Ferro Carril Oeste
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ciudad de Bolívar is 300% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.2 goals / match - Ciudad de Bolívar · 0.8 goals / match - Ferro Carril Oeste
Ciudad de Bolívar scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Ferro Carril Oeste keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).
Ferro Carril Oeste scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Ciudad de Bolívar keeps a clean sheet in 80% (8 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ciudad de Bolívar
Over / Under - Ferro Carril Oeste
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ciudad de Bolívar is 114% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Ciudad de Bolívar · 0.7 pts / match - Ferro Carril Oeste
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ciudad de Bolívar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ferro Carril Oeste - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ciudad de Bolívar
Ferro Carril Oeste
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).
Teams vs league
| Ciudad de Bolívar | Liga | Ferro Carril Oeste | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 0.90 | 1.81 | ▼ 1.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 38% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 28% | ▼ 10% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 80% | 40% | • 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 40% | 59% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 70% | • 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Ciudad de Bolívar vs Ferro Carril Oeste?
The Prim B Nacional match finished Ciudad de Bolívar 2:4 Ferro Carril Oeste. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ciudad de Bolívar vs Ferro Carril Oeste?
Ciudad de Bolívar score 0.70 goals per game on average and Ferro Carril Oeste 0.70. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Ciudad de Bolívar's matches and 30% of Ferro Carril Oeste's.
What form are Ciudad de Bolívar and Ferro Carril Oeste in?
Over the last 5 games Ciudad de Bolívar have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Ferro Carril Oeste 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ciudad de Bolívar vs Ferro Carril Oeste?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


