France - Ligue 2Data current as of 11 September 2026

Clermont vs Laval: match statistics

Clermont crest
Clermont
4 : 1half-time 1:0
Laval crest
Laval
135%(2.34)
X35%(2.85)
230%(2.92)

Statistical analysis points to a highly balanced match between two teams in similar form. Clermont displays stability at home with a 50% draw rate and an average of 1 goal scored and conceded per game; however, a low conversion rate (9%) and xG (1.26) suggest issues with finalization. Laval has shown better overall form in the last 5 matches (1.8 PPG vs 1.2 PPG for the hosts), netting 10 goals, but struggles on the road—failing to score in 44% of matches with a low xG (0.95). A key factor is Clermont's possession advantage (56% vs 47%), yet given their low scoring efficiency, this may not suffice to secure a win. Considering the hosts' tendency to draw (50% of home matches) and the even strength of both sides, a sharing of the points is the most likely outcome.

Clermont vs Laval: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Clermont played Laval in Ligue 2 (France). The match was played on 3 January 2026. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Clermont: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Laval: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Clermont scores 0.94 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Laval scores 0.76 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Clermont 59%, Laval 35%. Over 2.5: Clermont 41%, Laval 29%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Laval has higher xG: 1.15 vs 1.06. Clermont: 9.8 shots per match, Laval: 9.0.

Match halves

Clermont: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.53. Laval: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.29.

Goals by minute

Clermont: 16-30 (4 goals). Laval: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.50 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to a highly balanced match between two teams in similar form. Clermont displays stability at home with a 50% draw rate and an average of 1 goal scored and conceded per game; however, a low conversion rate (9%) and xG (1.26) suggest issues with finalization. Laval has shown better overall form in the last 5 matches (1.8 PPG vs 1.2 PPG for the hosts), netting 10 goals, but struggles on the road—failing to score in 44% of matches with a low xG (0.95). A key factor is Clermont's possession advantage (56% vs 47%), yet given their low scoring efficiency, this may not suffice to secure a win. Considering the hosts' tendency to draw (50% of home matches) and the even strength of both sides, a sharing of the points is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
ClermontLaval
13Shots7
ClermontLaval
7Shots on target0
ClermontLaval
1.62xG0.67
ClermontLaval
1Corners4
ClermontLaval
41Dangerous attacks29
ClermontLaval
14Fouls20
ClermontLaval
0Cards2
ClermontLaval

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.94Goals scored / match0.76
ClermontLaval
1.24Goals conceded / match1.29
ClermontLaval
52%Average possession48%
ClermontLaval
2.65Shots on target / match3.53
ClermontLaval

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.82Shots per match9
ClermontLaval
2.65Shots on target3.53
ClermontLaval
9.6%Shot conversion8.5%
ClermontLaval
52%Possession48%
ClermontLaval
1.06xG for1.15
ClermontLaval
1.6xG against1.38
ClermontLaval

Shooting quality

Clermont: BalancedLaval: Balanced
ClermontLaval
Accuracy (shots on target)27%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Laval is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Clermont · 1.2 pts / match - Laval

Clermont
LWDDL
Season result split
24% W41% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-6
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Laval
WLWLL
Season result split
18% W35% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-8
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Clermont is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - Clermont · 0.76 goals / match - Laval

Clermont scoring profile: very strong

Clermont scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Laval keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

Laval scoring profile: mixed

Laval scores in 47% of matches (8 of 17 matches), while Clermont keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

16Goals scored (season)13
ClermontLaval
21Goals conceded (season)22
ClermontLaval
2.18Average goals in match2.06
ClermontLaval
5Goals scored (last 5)5
ClermontLaval
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
ClermontLaval

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal47%
ClermontLaval
24%2 goals24%
ClermontLaval
0%3 goals6%
ClermontLaval
0%4 goals0%
ClermontLaval

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal76%
ClermontLaval
29%2 goals29%
ClermontLaval
12%3 goals18%
ClermontLaval
6%4 goals6%
ClermontLaval

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time12%
ClermontLaval
0%BTTS in both halves6%
ClermontLaval
0%Scored in both halves12%
ClermontLaval

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
ClermontLaval
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
ClermontLaval
60%BTTS - last 520%
ClermontLaval

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
ClermontLaval
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
ClermontLaval
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
ClermontLaval

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
ClermontLaval
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
ClermontLaval
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ClermontLaval

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Clermont is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Clermont · 1 pts / match - Laval

Clermont - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing
Laval - half-time state
18% leading47% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1
ClermontLaval
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.47
ClermontLaval
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
ClermontLaval
1Average goals (1st half)1.18
ClermontLaval
59%Clean sheet before half-time53%
ClermontLaval
71%No goal before half-time71%
ClermontLaval

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)0.94
ClermontLaval
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
ClermontLaval
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
ClermontLaval
1.18Average goals (2nd half)0.88
ClermontLaval
47%Clean sheet after half-time47%
ClermontLaval
59%No goal after half-time71%
ClermontLaval

Clermont - second-half results

29% W35% D35% L
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Laval - second-half results

18% W41% D41% L
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Clermont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Laval - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Clermont
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
4
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
3
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Laval
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
4
6
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.12
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Clermont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Laval

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

ClermontLigaLaval
Average goals in match 2.182.50 2.06
Both teams scored 59%51% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%47% 29%
Clean sheets 24%28% 24%
Goal before half-time 53%68% 65%
Goal after half-time 71%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ClermontGoalIlhan Fakili
  2. LavalYellow cardEthan Clavreul
  3. LavalYellow cardPeter Ouaneh
  4. LavalSubstitutionOn: Ilyes AradjOff: Joseph Samb
  5. ClermontGoalEnzo Cantero
  6. ClermontSubstitutionOn: Loïc Socka BonguéOff: Axel Camblan
  7. ClermontGoalAbdellah Baallal
  8. ClermontSubstitutionOn: Julien AsticOff: Allan Ackra
  9. ClermontGoalThéo Guivarch
  10. ClermontGoalJulien AsticAssist: Famara Diédhiou

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Clermont 0 - 1 - 0 Laval. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Stade Lavallois Mayenne FC
0 : 0
Clermont Foot 63

FAQ

What was the result of Clermont vs Laval?

The Ligue 2 match finished Clermont 4:1 Laval. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Clermont vs Laval?

Clermont score 0.94 goals per game on average and Laval 0.76. The Ligue 2 average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Clermont's matches and 35% of Laval's.

What form are Clermont and Laval in?

Over the last 5 games Clermont have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Laval 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Clermont vs Laval?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.