France - Ligue 2Data current as of 11 September 2026

Clermont vs Pau: match statistics

Clermont crest
Clermont
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Pau crest
Pau
135%(2.37)
X35%(3.25)
230%(2.60)

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most probable outcome. Clermont presents solid home form with a record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% defeats, scoring an average of 1.25 goals per game at home. Pau is slightly more effective offensively on the road (1.67 goals on average per away match) and has a better away win percentage (42%), but their form over the last 5 matches is weaker (0.8 PPG) compared to Clermont (1.2 PPG). The key factor is the defense - Pau concedes an average of 1.67 goals away, which, combined with the hosts' decent offense, could lead to a high-scoring game. Given both teams' similar xG values (Clermont 1.29 vs Pau 1.34) and current form, a draw seems the safest pick, although Clermont's slight edge stems from better recent form and home-field advantage.

Clermont vs Pau: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Clermont played Pau in Ligue 2 (France). The match was played on 13 March 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Clermont: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Pau: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Clermont scores 1.15 and concedes 1.35 goals per match. Pau scores 1.50 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.45 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Clermont 62%, Pau 58%. Over 2.5: Clermont 50%, Pau 69%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Pau has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.13. Clermont: 10.3 shots per match, Pau: 12.7.

Match halves

Clermont: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.73. Pau: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Clermont: 46-60 (7 goals). Pau: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most probable outcome. Clermont presents solid home form with a record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% defeats, scoring an average of 1.25 goals per game at home. Pau is slightly more effective offensively on the road (1.67 goals on average per away match) and has a better away win percentage (42%), but their form over the last 5 matches is weaker (0.8 PPG) compared to Clermont (1.2 PPG). The key factor is the defense - Pau concedes an average of 1.67 goals away, which, combined with the hosts' decent offense, could lead to a high-scoring game. Given both teams' similar xG values (Clermont 1.29 vs Pau 1.34) and current form, a draw seems the safest pick, although Clermont's slight edge stems from better recent form and home-field advantage.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
ClermontPau
10Shots8
ClermontPau
3Shots on target3
ClermontPau
1.12xG0.86
ClermontPau
5Corners0
ClermontPau
35Dangerous attacks20
ClermontPau
20Fouls15
ClermontPau
2Cards2
ClermontPau

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.15Goals scored / match1.5
ClermontPau
1.35Goals conceded / match1.69
ClermontPau
51%Average possession51%
ClermontPau
3.23Shots on target / match4.08
ClermontPau

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.35Shots per match12.73
ClermontPau
3.23Shots on target4.08
ClermontPau
11.2%Shot conversion11.8%
ClermontPau
51%Possession51%
ClermontPau
1.13xG for1.41
ClermontPau
1.48xG against1.26
ClermontPau

Shooting quality

Clermont: BalancedPau: Balanced
ClermontPau
Accuracy (shots on target)31%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Clermont is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Clermont · 0.8 pts / match - Pau

Clermont
LLWWL
Season result split
27% W27% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-12
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Pau
WLLLD
Season result split
35% W31% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-9
1.35 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pau is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.15 goals / match - Clermont · 1.5 goals / match - Pau

Clermont is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.35 goals / match - Clermont · 1.69 goals / match - Pau

Clermont scoring profile: very strong

Clermont scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while Pau keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

Pau scoring profile: very strong

Pau scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Clermont keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).

30Goals scored (season)39
ClermontPau
35Goals conceded (season)44
ClermontPau
2.5Average goals in match3.19
ClermontPau
9Goals scored (last 5)9
ClermontPau
9Goals conceded (last 5)11
ClermontPau

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal85%
ClermontPau
31%2 goals46%
ClermontPau
8%3 goals19%
ClermontPau
4%4 goals0%
ClermontPau

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal73%
ClermontPau
35%2 goals54%
ClermontPau
12%3 goals27%
ClermontPau
8%4 goals8%
ClermontPau

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time27%
ClermontPau
4%BTTS in both halves8%
ClermontPau
8%Scored in both halves27%
ClermontPau

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
ClermontPau
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
ClermontPau
80%BTTS - last 560%
ClermontPau

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
ClermontPau
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
ClermontPau
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time35%
ClermontPau

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
ClermontPau
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
ClermontPau
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
ClermontPau

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pau is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.12 pts / match - Clermont · 1.31 pts / match - Pau

Clermont - half-time state
19% leading54% draw27% trailing
Pau - half-time state
35% leading27% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.12Points per match (1st half)1.31
ClermontPau
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.88
ClermontPau
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.96
ClermontPau
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.85
ClermontPau
58%Clean sheet before half-time46%
ClermontPau
69%No goal before half-time42%
ClermontPau

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1.15
ClermontPau
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
ClermontPau
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
ClermontPau
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.35
ClermontPau
38%Clean sheet after half-time46%
ClermontPau
50%No goal after half-time46%
ClermontPau

Clermont - second-half results

31% W31% D38% L
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pau - second-half results

27% W35% D38% L
34
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Clermont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Pau - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Clermont
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
7
31-45
7
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Pau
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
8
9
16-30
9
7
31-45
6
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Clermont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Pau

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

ClermontLigaPau
Average goals in match 2.502.45 3.19
Both teams scored 62%50% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%47% 69%
Clean sheets 19%30% 27%
Goal before half-time 54%64% 85%
Goal after half-time 81%73% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.45
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PauYellow cardSteeve Beusnard
  2. PauSubstitutionOn: Cheikh FallOff: Julien Anziani
  3. ClermontYellow cardEl Hadj Koné
  4. PauSubstitutionOn: Antonin BobichonOff: Rayan Touzghar
  5. PauSubstitutionOn: Neil GlossoaOff: Tom Tony Pouilly
  6. ClermontSubstitutionOn: Axel CamblanOff: Enzo Cantero
  7. ClermontSubstitutionOn: Vital N'SimbaOff: El Hadj Koné
  8. PauYellow cardDaylam Meddah
  9. ClermontSubstitutionOn: Ilhan FakiliOff: Saidou Sow
  10. ClermontYellow cardThéo Guivarch

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Faouzi BenchabaneMatches officiated: 16
3.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 231%Home wins38%Draws31%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Clermont 0 - 0 - 1 Pau. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Pau FC
3 : 1
Clermont Foot 63

FAQ

What was the result of Clermont vs Pau?

The Ligue 2 match finished Clermont 0:1 Pau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Clermont vs Pau?

Clermont score 1.15 goals per game on average and Pau 1.50. The Ligue 2 average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Clermont's matches and 58% of Pau's.

What form are Clermont and Pau in?

Over the last 5 games Clermont have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Pau 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Clermont vs Pau?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.