France - Ligue 2Stade Gabriel MontpiedData current as of 15 October 2026

Clermont vs Red Star: match statistics

Clermont crest
Clermont
2 : 3half-time 1:1
Red Star crest
Red Star

Clermont vs Red Star: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Clermont played Red Star in Ligue 2 (France). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Stade Gabriel Montpied. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Clermont: 0-5-0, 1.00 points/match. Red Star: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Clermont scores 0.57 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. Red Star scores 1.29 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Clermont 57%, Red Star 57%. Over 2.5: Clermont 14%, Red Star 43%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Red Star has higher xG: 1.73 vs 0.89. Clermont: 8.0 shots per match, Red Star: 15.9.

Match halves

Clermont: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.57. Red Star: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Clermont: 76-90+ (3 goals). Red Star: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Red Star are 2nd and have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while 16th-placed Clermont have drawn all five. Away from home, the visitors average 1.75 goals and 4.75 shots on target per match; at home, the hosts average 0.25 goals and 1.75 shots on target, respectively. Red Star also hold a clear edge in chance quality: their away xG stands at 1.59, compared with Clermont’s 0.70 at home. However, the hosts concede just 0.25 goals per home match and have kept a clean sheet in 75% of those games, increasing the likelihood of another draw. Despite this, Clermont’s failure to score in 75% of their home matches, combined with Red Star scoring in every away game, points to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Red Star average 1.75 goals per away match and have scored in every such fixture, which points to an away goal despite Clermont keeping a clean sheet in 67% of their home games. The bigger uncertainty is the hosts’ finishing: they score just 0.67 goals per home match and have failed to score in 33% of games, although they create chances worth an average of 1.92 xG and record 6 shots on target. Clermont’s chances are boosted by Red Star conceding an average of 1.4 goals over their last five matches, with opponents generating an average of 1.45 xG. BTTS - Yes landed in 60% of Clermont’s last five matches and 80% of Red Star’s, making both teams to score slightly more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in 67% of Clermont’s home matches and 75% of Red Star’s away matches. Clermont averages just 0.67 goals at home, despite creating chances worth 1.92 xG; across its last five matches, it has scored only 0.6 goals per game. Red Star is more prolific, averaging 1.75 goals away from home, but no more than three goals were also scored in 75% of its away matches. The forecast of 2.35 total goals accounts for the visitors’ attacking advantage while indicating that the 3.5 line offers a greater margin than 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Red Star led at the break in 3 of their 4 away matches and did not concede in the first half in any of them, while Clermont failed to lead at half-time in all 3 of their home games. The visitors won 75% of their away matches and scored an average of 1.75 goals, compared with Clermont’s 0.67 goals at home, which points to Red Star maintaining their advantage after the break. Their recent form over the last 5 matches strengthens this signal: Red Star won 3, while Clermont did not win any. The 2/2 HT/FT selection is not without risk, however, as Clermont drew all 5 of their most recent matches, and their home xG is 1.92 compared with Red Star’s away xG of 1.59. A draw after the visitors lead at the break therefore remains a significant alternative, but the available data most strongly points to Red Star leading both at half-time and at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
ClermontRed Star
9Shots14
ClermontRed Star
4Shots on target9
ClermontRed Star
1.13xG1.79
ClermontRed Star
6Corners3
ClermontRed Star
37Dangerous attacks37
ClermontRed Star
14Fouls23
ClermontRed Star
2Cards2
ClermontRed Star

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.57Goals scored / match1.29
ClermontRed Star
0.86Goals conceded / match1
ClermontRed Star
52%Average possession53%
ClermontRed Star
2.43Shots on target / match5.29
ClermontRed Star

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match15.86
ClermontRed Star
2.43Shots on target5.29
ClermontRed Star
7.1%Shot conversion8.1%
ClermontRed Star
52%Possession53%
ClermontRed Star
0.89xG for1.73
ClermontRed Star
1.4xG against1.29
ClermontRed Star

Shooting quality

Clermont: BalancedRed Star: Attacking
ClermontRed Star
Accuracy (shots on target)30%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Red Star is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Clermont · 2 pts / match - Red Star

Clermont
DDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W86% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-6-1
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-5-0
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-4-0
Last 5 at home
0-4-0
DDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.01Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Red Star
DLWWW
Season result split
57% W29% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 away
3-1-0
WDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Red Star is 126% better for: goals scored per match.

0.57 goals / match - Clermont · 1.29 goals / match - Red Star

Clermont is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.86 goals / match - Clermont · 1 goals / match - Red Star

Clermont scoring profile: mixed

Clermont scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Red Star keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

Red Star scoring profile: strong

Red Star scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Clermont keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

4Goals scored (season)9
ClermontRed Star
6Goals conceded (season)7
ClermontRed Star
1.43Average goals in match2.29
ClermontRed Star
3Goals scored (last 5)8
ClermontRed Star
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
ClermontRed Star

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal86%
ClermontRed Star
0%2 goals29%
ClermontRed Star
0%3 goals14%
ClermontRed Star
0%4 goals0%
ClermontRed Star

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal57%
ClermontRed Star
14%2 goals14%
ClermontRed Star
14%3 goals14%
ClermontRed Star
0%4 goals14%
ClermontRed Star

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time14%
ClermontRed Star
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ClermontRed Star
0%Scored in both halves14%
ClermontRed Star

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
ClermontRed Star
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ClermontRed Star
60%BTTS - last 580%
ClermontRed Star

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
ClermontRed Star
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
ClermontRed Star
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
ClermontRed Star

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
ClermontRed Star
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
ClermontRed Star
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ClermontRed Star

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Red Star is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.57 pts / match - Clermont · 1.71 pts / match - Red Star

Clermont - half-time state
0% leading57% draw43% trailing
Red Star - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.57Points per match (1st half)1.71
ClermontRed Star
0Goals scored (1st half)0.86
ClermontRed Star
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
ClermontRed Star
0.43Average goals (1st half)1.14
ClermontRed Star
57%Clean sheet before half-time86%
ClermontRed Star
100%No goal before half-time43%
ClermontRed Star

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)1.14
ClermontRed Star
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
ClermontRed Star
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
ClermontRed Star
1Average goals (2nd half)1.14
ClermontRed Star
71%Clean sheet after half-time43%
ClermontRed Star
43%No goal after half-time57%
ClermontRed Star

Clermont - second-half results

29% W57% D14% L
4
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Red Star - second-half results

29% W29% D43% L
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Clermont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Red Star - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.80
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Clermont
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Red Star
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
73%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Clermont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
75% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
75%

Red Star

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

ClermontLigaRed Star
Average goals in match▼ 1.432.54▼ 2.29
Both teams scored• 57%57%• 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 14%44%• 43%
Clean sheets▲ 43%26%▲ 43%
Goal before half-time▼ 43%59%▼ 57%
Goal after half-time▼ 57%79%▲ 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Red StarGoalJovany IkangaAssist: Samuel Renel
  2. Red StarGoalDamien DurandAssist: Jovany Ikanga
  3. Red StarGoalJovany Ikanga
  4. ClermontYellow cardThéo Guivarch
  5. ClermontYellow cardFlorian Bianchini
  6. Red StarSubstitutionOn: Matthieu Emmanuel Wilfrid HuardOff: Elyaz Zidane
  7. ClermontSubstitutionOn: Ivan Adnan Joshua M'BahiaOff: Jean Grillot
  8. ClermontGoalFlorian Bianchini
  9. Red StarYellow cardJosué Escartin
  10. Red StarYellow cardIslamdine Halifa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Clermont 0 - 1 - 1 Red Star. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Clermont vs Red Star?

The Ligue 2 match finished Clermont 2:3 Red Star. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Clermont and Red Star?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Clermont won 0, Red Star won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Clermont vs Red Star?

Clermont score 0.57 goals per game on average and Red Star 1.29. The Ligue 2 average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Clermont's matches and 57% of Red Star's.

What form are Clermont and Red Star in?

Over the last 5 games Clermont have a 0-5-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Red Star 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Clermont vs Red Star?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Clermont vs Red Star: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.