Northern Ireland - NIFL PremiershipData current as of 08 September 2026

Cliftonville vs Carrick Rangers: match statistics

Cliftonville crest
Cliftonville
1 : 4half-time 1:3
Carrick Rangers crest
Carrick Rangers
155%(1.55)
X25%(3.95)
220%(5.20)

Cliftonville occupies a decidedly higher position in the table (6th place) compared to Carrick Rangers (11th place) and possesses a better goal difference at their home stadium (+5 vs -4 for the visitors). The hosts win 45% of their home matches, while the visitors triumph in only 27% of away fixtures, conceding an average of 1.64 goals per match. Cliftonville holds the advantage in expected goals (xG 1.56 vs 1.32), indicating superior quality in creating scoring chances. The form of both teams is balanced (1.2 vs 1.0 PPG); however, Cliftonville's home statistics and Carrick Rangers' weaker defense argue for a home win. Nevertheless, it must be noted that Cliftonville has secured only 1 victory in their last five matches, which may affect the team's confidence and makes a draw a realistic scenario as well.

Cliftonville vs Carrick Rangers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cliftonville played Carrick Rangers in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The match was played on 17 January 2026. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Cliftonville: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Carrick Rangers: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cliftonville scores 1.43 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Carrick Rangers scores 1.09 and concedes 1.77. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cliftonville 62%, Carrick Rangers 59%. Over 2.5: Cliftonville 52%, Carrick Rangers 55%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Cliftonville has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.30. Cliftonville: 11.7 shots per match, Carrick Rangers: 9.9.

Match halves

Cliftonville: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.90. Carrick Rangers: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Cliftonville: 46-60 (8 goals). Carrick Rangers: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NIFL Premiership: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cliftonville occupies a decidedly higher position in the table (6th place) compared to Carrick Rangers (11th place) and possesses a better goal difference at their home stadium (+5 vs -4 for the visitors). The hosts win 45% of their home matches, while the visitors triumph in only 27% of away fixtures, conceding an average of 1.64 goals per match. Cliftonville holds the advantage in expected goals (xG 1.56 vs 1.32), indicating superior quality in creating scoring chances. The form of both teams is balanced (1.2 vs 1.0 PPG); however, Cliftonville's home statistics and Carrick Rangers' weaker defense argue for a home win. Nevertheless, it must be noted that Cliftonville has secured only 1 victory in their last five matches, which may affect the team's confidence and makes a draw a realistic scenario as well.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
9Shots14
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
3Shots on target10
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
1.12xG1.99
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
4Corners8
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
47Dangerous attacks57
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
12Fouls10
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
2Cards0
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
1.43Goals scored / match1.09
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
1.24Goals conceded / match1.77
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
54%Average possession44%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
4.24Shots on target / match3.77
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.71Shots per match9.86
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
4.24Shots on target3.77
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
12.2%Shot conversion11.1%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
54%Possession44%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
1.43xG for1.3
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
1.34xG against1.52
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

Shooting quality

Cliftonville: BalancedCarrick Rangers: Balanced
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cliftonville is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Cliftonville · 0.6 pts / match - Carrick Rangers

Cliftonville
WDLDD
Season result split
38% W33% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-6
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Carrick Rangers
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W23% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-12
0.91 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cliftonville is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.43 goals / match - Cliftonville · 1.09 goals / match - Carrick Rangers

Cliftonville is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Cliftonville · 1.77 goals / match - Carrick Rangers

Cliftonville scoring profile: very strong

Cliftonville scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Carrick Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

Carrick Rangers scoring profile: very strong

Carrick Rangers scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Cliftonville keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).

30Goals scored (season)24
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
26Goals conceded (season)39
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
2.67Average goals in match2.86
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
9Goals scored (last 5)4
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
7Goals conceded (last 5)12
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal77%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
38%2 goals18%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
19%3 goals9%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
5%4 goals5%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal77%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
48%2 goals59%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
5%3 goals23%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
0%4 goals5%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time27%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
5%BTTS in both halves5%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
19%Scored in both halves9%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
80%BTTS - last 560%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cliftonville is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / match - Cliftonville · 1.09 pts / match - Carrick Rangers

Cliftonville - half-time state
29% leading33% draw38% trailing
Carrick Rangers - half-time state
23% leading41% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per match (1st half)1.09
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.59
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.41
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
48%Clean sheet before half-time41%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
62%No goal before half-time55%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)0.82
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
0.9Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.95
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.45
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
57%Clean sheet after half-time41%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers
43%No goal after half-time59%
CliftonvilleCarrick Rangers

Cliftonville - second-half results

33% W52% R14% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Carrick Rangers - second-half results

14% W41% R45% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cliftonville - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Carrick Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cliftonville
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
1
46-60
3
4
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Carrick Rangers
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
5
4
16-30
8
8
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.77
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cliftonville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Carrick Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).

Teams vs league

CliftonvilleLigaCarrick Rangers
Average goals in match 2.672.74 2.86
Both teams scored 62%48% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%52% 55%
Clean sheets 29%28% 23%
Goal before half-time 76%74% 77%
Goal after half-time 62%77% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CliftonvilleGoalBrian Healy
  2. Carrick RangersGoalDaniel Purkis
  3. Carrick RangersGoalPaul HeatleyAssist: Daniel Gibson
  4. Carrick RangersGoalDaniel Purkis
  5. Carrick RangersSubstitutionOn: Aidan SteeleOff: Ryan McKay
  6. Carrick RangersGoalDaniel Purkis
  7. CliftonvilleYellow cardBrian Healy
  8. Carrick RangersSubstitutionOn: Adam LeckyOff: Matthew Olosunde
  9. CliftonvilleYellow cardHarry Wilson
  10. Carrick RangersSubstitutionOn: Joseph MooreOff: Paul Heatley

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Steven GreggMatches officiated: 15
4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 233%Home wins20%Draws47%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Cliftonville 2 - 0 - 0 Carrick Rangers. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Carrick Rangers FC
0 : 1
Cliftonville FC
Carrick Rangers FC
1 : 2
Cliftonville FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cliftonville vs Carrick Rangers?

The NIFL Premiership match finished Cliftonville 1:4 Carrick Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cliftonville and Carrick Rangers?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cliftonville won 2, Carrick Rangers won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cliftonville vs Carrick Rangers?

Cliftonville score 1.43 goals per game on average and Carrick Rangers 1.09. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Cliftonville's matches and 59% of Carrick Rangers's.

What form are Cliftonville and Carrick Rangers in?

Over the last 5 games Cliftonville have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Carrick Rangers 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cliftonville vs Carrick Rangers?

The statistical background for Cliftonville vs Carrick Rangers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.