Cliftonville vs Crusaders: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cliftonville played Crusaders in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The match was played on 26 December 2025. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Cliftonville: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Crusaders: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cliftonville scores 1.50 and concedes 1.22 goals per match. Crusaders scores 1.20 and concedes 2.05. League average: 2.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cliftonville 61%, Crusaders 45%. Over 2.5: Cliftonville 50%, Crusaders 65%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Cliftonville has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.19. Cliftonville: 11.3 shots per match, Crusaders: 10.0.

Match halves

Cliftonville: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.94. Crusaders: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Cliftonville: 46-60 (8 goals). Crusaders: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NIFL Premiership: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
CliftonvilleCrusaders
18Shots8
CliftonvilleCrusaders
7Shots on target3
CliftonvilleCrusaders
2.35xG1.11
CliftonvilleCrusaders
16Corners4
CliftonvilleCrusaders
102Dangerous attacks54
CliftonvilleCrusaders
10Fouls12
CliftonvilleCrusaders
3Cards2
CliftonvilleCrusaders

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CliftonvilleCrusaders
1.5Goals scored / match1.2
CliftonvilleCrusaders
1.22Goals conceded / match2.05
CliftonvilleCrusaders
54%Average possession52%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
4.11Shots on target / match3.4
CliftonvilleCrusaders

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.33Shots per match10
CliftonvilleCrusaders
4.11Shots on target3.4
CliftonvilleCrusaders
13.2%Shot conversion12%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
54%Possession52%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
1.37xG for1.19
CliftonvilleCrusaders
1.36xG against1.87
CliftonvilleCrusaders

Shooting quality

Cliftonville: Efficient finishingCrusaders: Balanced
CliftonvilleCrusaders
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cliftonville
WWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
44% W28% D28% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-5
1.61 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Crusaders
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W10% D65% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-13
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cliftonville is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Cliftonville · 1.2 goals / match - Crusaders

Cliftonville is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.22 goals / match - Cliftonville · 2.05 goals / match - Crusaders

Cliftonville scoring profile: very strong

Cliftonville scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Crusaders keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 matches).

Crusaders scoring profile: strong

Crusaders scores in 55% of matches (11 of 20 matches), while Cliftonville keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).

27Goals scored (season)24
CliftonvilleCrusaders
22Goals conceded (season)41
CliftonvilleCrusaders
2.72Average goals in match3.25
CliftonvilleCrusaders
12Goals scored (last 5)0
CliftonvilleCrusaders
7Goals conceded (last 5)12
CliftonvilleCrusaders

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal55%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
39%2 goals40%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
22%3 goals20%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
6%4 goals5%
CliftonvilleCrusaders

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal90%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
44%2 goals60%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
6%3 goals30%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
0%4 goals25%
CliftonvilleCrusaders

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time15%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
17%Scored in both halves25%
CliftonvilleCrusaders

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
80%BTTS - last 50%
CliftonvilleCrusaders

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time90%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
CliftonvilleCrusaders

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
CliftonvilleCrusaders

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cliftonville is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.28 pts / match - Cliftonville · 1.15 pts / match - Crusaders

Cliftonville - half-time state
33% leading28% draw39% trailing
Crusaders - half-time state
35% leading10% draw55% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1.15
CliftonvilleCrusaders
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.65
CliftonvilleCrusaders
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.95
CliftonvilleCrusaders
1.22Average goals (1st half)1.6
CliftonvilleCrusaders
50%Clean sheet before half-time30%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
61%No goal before half-time65%
CliftonvilleCrusaders

After half-time (2nd half)

1.61Points per match (2nd half)1
CliftonvilleCrusaders
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
CliftonvilleCrusaders
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)1.1
CliftonvilleCrusaders
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.65
CliftonvilleCrusaders
61%Clean sheet after half-time30%
CliftonvilleCrusaders
44%No goal after half-time55%
CliftonvilleCrusaders

Cliftonville - second-half results

39% W44% D17% L
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Crusaders - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding71%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cliftonville - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match2.21.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
Crusaders - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.000.40
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-6-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cliftonville
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
5
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
0
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Crusaders
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
11
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
5
61-75
3
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cliftonville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.59
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Crusaders

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.85
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).

Teams vs league

CliftonvilleLigaCrusaders
Average goals in match 2.722.76 3.25
Both teams scored 61%50% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%52% 65%
Clean sheets 28%26% 10%
Goal before half-time 78%76% 90%
Goal after half-time 61%78% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CliftonvilleSubstitutionOn: Lewis RiddOff: Peter Morrison
  2. CliftonvilleGoalRyan Curran
  3. CrusadersSubstitutionOn: Evan EastonOff: Lewis Barr
  4. CliftonvilleYellow cardJack Keaney
  5. CrusadersYellow cardFraser Bryden
  6. CrusadersSubstitutionOn: Odhrán McCartOff: Josh Williamson
  7. CliftonvilleSubstitutionOn: Micheál GlynnOff: Keevan Hawthorne
  8. CliftonvilleYellow cardConor Pepper
  9. CrusadersGoalAdam Brooks
  10. CliftonvilleYellow cardThomas Lavery
  11. CliftonvilleGoalOdhran Casey

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Cliftonville vs Crusaders?

The NIFL Premiership match finished Cliftonville 1:2 Crusaders. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cliftonville vs Crusaders?

Cliftonville score 1.50 goals per game on average and Crusaders 1.20. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Cliftonville's matches and 45% of Crusaders's.

What form are Cliftonville and Crusaders in?

Over the last 5 games Cliftonville have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Crusaders 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cliftonville vs Crusaders?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cliftonville vs Crusaders: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.