Belgium - First Division BData current as of 13 September 2026

Club Brugge II vs Patro Eisden: match statistics

Club Brugge II crest
Club Brugge II
2 : 3half-time 0:1
Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden
125%(3.35)
X30%(3.24)
245%(2.03)

Patro Eisden presents significantly better form and statistics this season. The guests occupy 5th place in the table with a record of 11 wins, while Club Brugge II ranks 16th with only 4 victories. The form of the last five matches clearly favors Patro Eisden (2.2 points per match) over the hosts (1.8 points). A key factor is the guests' advantage in away matches: 36% wins compared to only 25% wins for the hosts at home, as well as a better goal difference (+4 for guests versus -7 for hosts). xG statistics also speak in favor of Patro Eisden (1.78 xG away versus 1.38 xG for hosts at home), indicating their greater offensive efficiency. However, Patro Eisden's high percentage of away draws (36%) justifies a significant probability of sharing points. Taking all factors into account, Patro Eisden is the favorite for this meeting.

Club Brugge II vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Club Brugge II played Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 13 February 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Club Brugge II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Patro Eisden: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Club Brugge II scores 1.00 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 1.39 and concedes 1.04. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Club Brugge II 57%, Patro Eisden 48%. Over 2.5: Club Brugge II 52%, Patro Eisden 39%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.36. Club Brugge II: 12.0 shots per match, Patro Eisden: 15.7.

Match halves

Club Brugge II: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.78. Patro Eisden: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Club Brugge II: 76-90+ (8 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Patro Eisden presents significantly better form and statistics this season. The guests occupy 5th place in the table with a record of 11 wins, while Club Brugge II ranks 16th with only 4 victories. The form of the last five matches clearly favors Patro Eisden (2.2 points per match) over the hosts (1.8 points). A key factor is the guests' advantage in away matches: 36% wins compared to only 25% wins for the hosts at home, as well as a better goal difference (+4 for guests versus -7 for hosts). xG statistics also speak in favor of Patro Eisden (1.78 xG away versus 1.38 xG for hosts at home), indicating their greater offensive efficiency. However, Patro Eisden's high percentage of away draws (36%) justifies a significant probability of sharing points. Taking all factors into account, Patro Eisden is the favorite for this meeting.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
8Shots16
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
4Shots on target7
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
0.99xG1.94
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
1Corners4
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
25Dangerous attacks63
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
10Fouls24
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
4Cards2
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
1Goals scored / match1.39
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
1.57Goals conceded / match1.04
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
57%Average possession37%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
4.13Shots on target / match5.3
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.04Shots per match15.7
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
4.13Shots on target5.3
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
8.3%Shot conversion8.9%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
57%Possession37%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
1.36xG for1.72
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
1.69xG against1.11
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

Club Brugge II: BalancedPatro Eisden: Attacking
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Patro Eisden is 22% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Club Brugge II · 2.2 pts / match - Patro Eisden

Club Brugge II
LWWWL
Season result split
17% W17% D65% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-15
0.70 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-7
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Patro Eisden
WWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
48% W30% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-5
1.74 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Patro Eisden is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Club Brugge II · 1.39 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden is 51% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.57 goals / match - Club Brugge II · 1.04 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Club Brugge II scoring profile: strong

Club Brugge II scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: very strong

Patro Eisden scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).

23Goals scored (season)32
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
36Goals conceded (season)24
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
2.57Average goals in match2.43
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
8Goals scored (last 5)11
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal70%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
22%2 goals43%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
9%3 goals13%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
0%4 goals13%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal65%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
52%2 goals30%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
13%3 goals4%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
4%4 goals4%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time17%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
4%BTTS in both halves9%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
13%Scored in both halves22%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
40%BTTS - last 560%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Patro Eisden is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / match - Club Brugge II · 1.48 pts / match - Patro Eisden

Club Brugge II - half-time state
13% leading48% draw39% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
35% leading43% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per match (1st half)1.48
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
0.22Goals scored (1st half)0.61
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
0.87Average goals (1st half)1
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
52%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
78%No goal before half-time61%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
0.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
1.7Average goals (2nd half)1.43
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
35%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden
39%No goal after half-time48%
Club Brugge IIPatro Eisden

Club Brugge II - second-half results

22% W43% D35% L
20
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

35% W35% D30% L
34
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding137%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Club Brugge II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.22.2
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Club Brugge II
ScoredConceded
1
7
0-15
4
3
16-30
0
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
7
11
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
2
31-45
4
7
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Club Brugge II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Club Brugge IILigaPatro Eisden
Average goals in match 2.572.73 2.43
Both teams scored 57%53% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%51% 39%
Clean sheets 13%27% 35%
Goal before half-time 61%71% 61%
Goal after half-time 83%78% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Club Brugge IIYellow cardThibaut Van Acker
  2. Patro EisdenGoalLéandro Rousseau
  3. Patro EisdenYellow cardArnaud Dony
  4. Club Brugge IIGoalThibaut Van AckerAssist: Tobias Jensen Lund
  5. Patro EisdenGoalLéandro Rousseau
  6. Club Brugge IIGoalYanis MusuayiAssist: Tobias Jensen Lund
  7. Club Brugge IISubstitutionOn: Rayan BuifrahiOff: Tian Koren
  8. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Raymond AsanteOff: Ridwane M'Barki
  9. Patro EisdenYellow cardStef Peeters
  10. Club Brugge IIYellow cardAlexander Vandeperre
  11. Patro EisdenGoalDenys PrychynenkoAssist: Kjetil Borry
  12. Club Brugge IIRed cardLynnt Audoor
  13. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Alois PeninOff: Milan Robberechts

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Massimiliano LeddaMatches officiated: 15
5.33Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 247%Home wins27%Draws27%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Club Brugge II 0 - 0 - 1 Patro Eisden. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
2 : 1
Club Brugge KV II

FAQ

What was the result of Club Brugge II vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished Club Brugge II 2:3 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Club Brugge II vs Patro Eisden?

Club Brugge II score 1.00 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.39. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Club Brugge II's matches and 48% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are Club Brugge II and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games Club Brugge II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Patro Eisden 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Club Brugge II vs Patro Eisden?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Club Brugge II vs Patro Eisden: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.