Club Brugge II vs RWDM: match statistics
Club Brugge II vs RWDM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Club Brugge II played RWDM in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 17 December 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Club Brugge II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. RWDM: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Club Brugge II scores 0.94 and concedes 1.88 goals per match. RWDM scores 1.81 and concedes 1.75. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Club Brugge II 69%, RWDM 63%. Over 2.5: Club Brugge II 56%, RWDM 63%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
RWDM has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.27. Club Brugge II: 11.3 shots per match, RWDM: 12.8.
Match halves
Club Brugge II: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.69. RWDM: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.94.
Goals by minute
Club Brugge II: 76-90+ (6 goals). RWDM: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Club Brugge II | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Club Brugge II is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Club Brugge II · 0.4 pts / match - RWDM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 93% better for: goals scored per match.
0.94 goals / match - Club Brugge II · 1.81 goals / match - RWDM
RWDM is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.88 goals / match - Club Brugge II · 1.75 goals / match - RWDM
Club Brugge II scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
RWDM scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Club Brugge II
Over / Under - RWDM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RWDM is 125% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.75 pts / match - Club Brugge II · 1.69 pts / match - RWDM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Club Brugge II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 6%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Club Brugge II
RWDM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Club Brugge II | Liga | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.81 | 2.71 | ▲ 3.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 53% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 50% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 27% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 78% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Club Brugge II 0 - 0 - 1 RWDM. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Club Brugge II vs RWDM?
The First Division B match finished Club Brugge II 0:1 RWDM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Club Brugge II vs RWDM?
Club Brugge II score 0.94 goals per game on average and RWDM 1.81. The First Division B average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Club Brugge II's matches and 63% of RWDM's.
What form are Club Brugge II and RWDM in?
Over the last 5 games Club Brugge II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and RWDM 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Club Brugge II vs RWDM?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.