Club Brugge vs RSC Anderlecht: match statistics
Club Brugge vs RSC Anderlecht: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Club Brugge played RSC Anderlecht in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Club Brugge: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. RSC Anderlecht: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Club Brugge scores 1.97 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. RSC Anderlecht scores 1.43 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Club Brugge 60%, RSC Anderlecht 47%. Over 2.5: Club Brugge 60%, RSC Anderlecht 43%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Club Brugge has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.69. Club Brugge: 16.4 shots per match, RSC Anderlecht: 14.9.
Match halves
Club Brugge: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.17. RSC Anderlecht: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.83.
Goals by minute
Club Brugge: 76-90+ (14 goals). RSC Anderlecht: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Pro League: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Club Brugge has a clear statistical edge and is the favorite — at home they win 73% of matches, score 2.27 goals per game on average and record 2.11 xG with 18.87 shots and 6.4 on target. RSC Anderlecht win only 27% of away matches, score 1.2 goals on average, have xG 1.48 and register 12.93 shots with 4 on target, and in 40% of away games they fail to score. In the last 5 matches Brugge have scored 11 goals and achieved 3 wins (an average of 2 points per game); Anderlecht have scored 13 goals but hold a 2-1-2 record and average 1.4 points per game; both teams conceded 9 goals in this sequence. Defensively the hosts perform better — they concede 1.27 goals per home game versus 1.67 conceded by Anderlecht away, have 33% clean sheets versus 20% for the visitors, and lower average xG against (1.21 vs 1.79). Considering the higher conversion rate (12% vs 9%), the possession advantage (65% vs 53%) and the very low share of goalless matches for Brugge (7% vs 40%), I predict a home win and estimate probabilities: 65% for Brugge, 20% for a draw and 15% for Anderlecht.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I rate BTTS - Yes at 75% due to clear offensive signals from both teams. In the last 5 matches Brugge had BTTS in 100% and Anderlecht in 80%; hosts averaged 2.2 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while visitors averaged 2.6 scored and 1.8 conceded. Seasonally Brugge records 1.67 goals per game and xG 1.90 versus Anderlecht, who concedes xG at 1.79, which favors goals for the hosts; Anderlecht also has xG 1.48 against a Brugge defense that allows 1.09 xG, giving the visitors realistic scoring chances. Brugge average 5.6 shots on target versus Anderlecht’s 4.0, and the league posts BTTS in 54% of matches with an average of 2.62 goals per game, so the overall context and recent form strongly support a Both Teams To Score outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis indicates 1.90 xG for Club Brugge’s attack and 1.48 for Anderlecht, with 1.79 xG conceded for Anderlecht and 1.09 xG conceded for Brugge, yielding an estimated ~1.85 goals for the home side and ~1.29 for the away side (total ~3.14). This season Club Brugge averages 1.67 goals scored and 0.93 conceded, while Anderlecht averages 1.20 scored and 1.67 conceded, so goal differential favors a match with at least three goals. In the last 5 matches the home team averaged 2.2 goals and the visitors 2.6 goals, and Over 2.5 occurred in 100% of Brugge’s and 80% of Anderlecht’s last 5 games, a strong short-term signal for the over. Additionally, average shots (16.93 vs 12.93), shots on target (5.6 vs 4.0) and conversion rates (10% vs 9%) support realistic chances of crossing the 2.5 line, therefore I recommend betting Over 2.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
HT analysis indicates the most reliable half-time state is a draw: Club Brugge led at the break in 27% of their matches, Anderlecht in 27%, and HT draws occur on average around 50% (53% for Brugge and 47% for Anderlecht). After the break the home advantage becomes apparent — Club Brugge has an xG of 1.90 versus Anderlecht’s 1.48, scores on average 1.07 goals in second halves (vs 0.6 for Anderlecht) and records 5.6 shots on target compared to 4.0, giving them greater chances of scoring the decisive goal. Consequently, the scenario draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1) is considered the strongest and I price it at approximately 23%, while a home lead at the break and maintained to full-time (1/1) I estimate at about 22%. Less likely are a maintained draw (X/X ~18%) or an Anderlecht win (X/2 ~10%, 2/2 ~6%), since the visitors have lower second-half effectiveness (points after the break 14 vs 29 for the home side) and an overall away win rate of 27%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Club Brugge | RSC Anderlecht | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Club Brugge is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Club Brugge · 1.4 pts / match - RSC Anderlecht
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Club Brugge is 38% better for: goals scored per match.
1.97 goals / match - Club Brugge · 1.43 goals / match - RSC Anderlecht
Club Brugge is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - Club Brugge · 1.3 goals / match - RSC Anderlecht
Club Brugge scores in 87% of matches (26 of 30 matches), while RSC Anderlecht keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).
RSC Anderlecht scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Club Brugge keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Club Brugge
Over / Under - RSC Anderlecht
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Club Brugge - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
RSC Anderlecht - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Club Brugge
RSC Anderlecht
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Club Brugge | Liga | RSC Anderlecht | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.17 | 2.62 | ▲ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 47% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 71% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Club Brugge 0 - 1 - 1 RSC Anderlecht. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Club Brugge vs RSC Anderlecht?
The Pro League match finished Club Brugge 4:2 RSC Anderlecht. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Club Brugge and RSC Anderlecht?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Club Brugge won 0, RSC Anderlecht won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Club Brugge vs RSC Anderlecht?
Club Brugge score 1.97 goals per game on average and RSC Anderlecht 1.43. The Pro League average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Club Brugge's matches and 47% of RSC Anderlecht's.
What form are Club Brugge and RSC Anderlecht in?
Over the last 5 games Club Brugge have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and RSC Anderlecht 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Club Brugge vs RSC Anderlecht?
The statistical background for Club Brugge vs RSC Anderlecht — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


