Scotland - League TwoData current as of 23 July 2026

Clyde vs Forfar Athletic: match statistics

Clyde crest
Clyde
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Forfar Athletic crest
Forfar Athletic
155%(1.75)
X30%(3.45)
215%(3.95)

Clyde holds a solid league position (3rd place) and boasts an impressive home defense, conceding just 1 goal per match on average with a 44% clean sheet rate. The hosts possess a positive goal difference of +1 in home fixtures, whereas Forfar Athletic struggles with a negative goal difference of -3 on the road. The visitors display poor away form with a 56% loss rate and only 22% wins, conceding an average of 1.67 goals per game. xG statistics also favor Clyde (1.25 vs 0.9), indicating superior chance creation quality. Although recent form for both teams is uninspiring, the hosts' defensive solidity and home advantage provide a real chance for victory, though Clyde's high home draw rate (44%) means a share of the points cannot be ruled out.

Clyde vs Forfar Athletic: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Clyde play Forfar Athletic in League Two (Scotland). The match date is 3 January 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Clyde: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Forfar Athletic: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Clyde scores 1.61 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Forfar Athletic scores 1.42 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Clyde 64%, Forfar Athletic 53%. Over 2.5: Clyde 53%, Forfar Athletic 50%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Clyde has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.13. Clyde: 9.6 shots per match, Forfar Athletic: 7.7.

Match halves

Clyde: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.89. Forfar Athletic: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Clyde: 31-45+ (12 goals). Forfar Athletic: 31-45+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-3-0. Average goals 0.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Clyde holds a solid league position (3rd place) and boasts an impressive home defense, conceding just 1 goal per match on average with a 44% clean sheet rate. The hosts possess a positive goal difference of +1 in home fixtures, whereas Forfar Athletic struggles with a negative goal difference of -3 on the road. The visitors display poor away form with a 56% loss rate and only 22% wins, conceding an average of 1.67 goals per game. xG statistics also favor Clyde (1.25 vs 0.9), indicating superior chance creation quality. Although recent form for both teams is uninspiring, the hosts' defensive solidity and home advantage provide a real chance for victory, though Clyde's high home draw rate (44%) means a share of the points cannot be ruled out.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
ClydeForfar Athletic
13Shots14
ClydeForfar Athletic
6Shots on target6
ClydeForfar Athletic
1.66xG1.76
ClydeForfar Athletic
3Corners5
ClydeForfar Athletic
58Dangerous attacks64
ClydeForfar Athletic
9Fouls12
ClydeForfar Athletic
6Cards2
ClydeForfar Athletic

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ClydeForfar Athletic
1.61Goals scored / match1.42
ClydeForfar Athletic
1.14Goals conceded / match1.28
ClydeForfar Athletic
50%Average possession48%
ClydeForfar Athletic
4.97Shots on target / match4.17
ClydeForfar Athletic

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.64Shots per match7.69
ClydeForfar Athletic
4.97Shots on target4.17
ClydeForfar Athletic
16.7%Shot conversion18.4%
ClydeForfar Athletic
50%Possession48%
ClydeForfar Athletic
1.33xG for1.13
ClydeForfar Athletic
1.15xG against1.18
ClydeForfar Athletic

Shooting quality

Clyde: Efficient finishingForfar Athletic: Efficient finishing
ClydeForfar Athletic
Accuracy (shots on target)52%54%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Forfar Athletic is 8% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Clyde · 2.6 pts / match - Forfar Athletic

Clyde
WWWWL
Season result split
39% W39% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-14-8
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-6-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Forfar Athletic
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
36% W31% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-12
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Clyde is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.61 goals / match - Clyde · 1.42 goals / match - Forfar Athletic

Clyde is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.14 goals / match - Clyde · 1.28 goals / match - Forfar Athletic

Clyde scoring profile: very strong

Clyde scores in 81% of matches (29 of 36 matches), while Forfar Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).

Forfar Athletic scoring profile: strong

Forfar Athletic scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while Clyde keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).

58Goals scored (season)51
ClydeForfar Athletic
41Goals conceded (season)46
ClydeForfar Athletic
2.75Average goals in match2.69
ClydeForfar Athletic
10Goals scored (last 5)9
ClydeForfar Athletic
7Goals conceded (last 5)2
ClydeForfar Athletic

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal75%
ClydeForfar Athletic
39%2 goals36%
ClydeForfar Athletic
22%3 goals17%
ClydeForfar Athletic
11%4 goals14%
ClydeForfar Athletic

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal69%
ClydeForfar Athletic
28%2 goals36%
ClydeForfar Athletic
11%3 goals17%
ClydeForfar Athletic
3%4 goals3%
ClydeForfar Athletic

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time25%
ClydeForfar Athletic
0%BTTS in both halves11%
ClydeForfar Athletic
28%Scored in both halves22%
ClydeForfar Athletic

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
ClydeForfar Athletic
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
ClydeForfar Athletic
40%BTTS - last 540%
ClydeForfar Athletic

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
ClydeForfar Athletic
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
ClydeForfar Athletic
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
ClydeForfar Athletic

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
ClydeForfar Athletic
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
ClydeForfar Athletic
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
ClydeForfar Athletic

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Forfar Athletic is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Clyde · 1.86 pts / match - Forfar Athletic

Clyde - half-time state
31% leading42% draw28% trailing
Forfar Athletic - half-time state
50% leading36% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.86
ClydeForfar Athletic
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.92
ClydeForfar Athletic
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
ClydeForfar Athletic
1.28Average goals (1st half)1.44
ClydeForfar Athletic
56%Clean sheet before half-time61%
ClydeForfar Athletic
50%No goal before half-time39%
ClydeForfar Athletic

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.06
ClydeForfar Athletic
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
ClydeForfar Athletic
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
ClydeForfar Athletic
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.25
ClydeForfar Athletic
58%Clean sheet after half-time47%
ClydeForfar Athletic
42%No goal after half-time64%
ClydeForfar Athletic

Clyde - second-half results

44% W33% R22% P
48
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
60
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Forfar Athletic - second-half results

19% W47% R33% P
67
Half-time points
33
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 36%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Clyde - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Forfar Athletic - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.60.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Clyde
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
11
6
16-30
12
11
31-45
11
6
46-60
10
7
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Forfar Athletic
ScoredConceded
8
7
0-15
11
8
16-30
14
4
31-45
4
7
46-60
8
7
61-75
6
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-75%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Clyde

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Forfar Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

ClydeLigaForfar Athletic
Average goals in match 2.752.92 2.69
Both teams scored 64%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 50%
Clean sheets 31%22% 31%
Goal before half-time 72%74% 75%
Goal after half-time 78%79% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Clyde 0 - 3 - 0 Forfar Athletic. Average goals 0.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Forfar Athletic FC
1 : 1
Clyde FC
Forfar Athletic FC
0 : 0
Clyde FC
Clyde FC
0 : 0
Forfar Athletic FC

FAQ

What was the result of Clyde vs Forfar Athletic?

The League Two match finished Clyde 1:1 Forfar Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Clyde and Forfar Athletic?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Clyde won 0, Forfar Athletic won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 0.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Clyde vs Forfar Athletic?

Clyde score 1.61 goals per game on average and Forfar Athletic 1.42. The League Two average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Clyde's matches and 53% of Forfar Athletic's.

What form are Clyde and Forfar Athletic in?

Over the last 5 games Clyde have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Forfar Athletic 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Clyde vs Forfar Athletic?

The statistical background for Clyde vs Forfar Athletic — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.