Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraMkwakwani StadiumData current as of 01 September 2026

Coastal Union vs Kitayosce: match statistics

Coastal Union crest
Coastal Union
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce

Coastal Union vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Coastal Union played Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 24 August 2026. Venue: Mkwakwani Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Coastal Union: 0-0-2, 0.00 points/match. Kitayosce: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Coastal Union scores 0.50 and concedes 2.50 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Coastal Union 50%, Kitayosce 100%. Over 2.5: Coastal Union 50%, Kitayosce 50%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Kitayosce has higher xG: 1.68 vs 0.53. Coastal Union: 1.0 shots per match, Kitayosce: 11.5.

Match halves

Coastal Union: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Kitayosce: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Coastal Union: 76-90+ (1 goals). Kitayosce: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Coastal Union come into this match after losing their only home game so far, in which they failed to score and conceded once. Kitayosce are also still without a win this season, but drew their away match 1:1, averaging 13 shots, including 6 on target, with 52% possession. The visitors create relatively good chances, as reflected by their average xG of 1.53, but they have scored just 2 goals in their last five matches and drew four of those games. Coastal Union have a slightly better record over their last five fixtures, with 2 wins and 7 points, but their 6:6 goal difference highlights a lack of consistency. The visitors’ edge in chance creation is offset by their clear tendency to draw, making a share of the points the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No pick is a slight favourite, primarily due to Kitayosce’s limited attacking efficiency: they have averaged just 0.4 goals and scored 2 goals in total across their last 5 matches. Coastal Union have averaged 1.2 goals per match over the same period, but 60% of their matches ended with BTTS, compared with 40% for the visitors, which does not provide a clear signal for both teams to score. Kitayosce have created chances worth an average of 1.34 xG; however, Coastal Union’s opponents have generated as much as 1.89 xG, meaning the visitors’ result depends on improving their very poor finishing. The league average for BTTS is only 46%, while the average number of goals in the competition is 2.0. Therefore, the more likely scenario is that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The projected total of 1.95 goals remains slightly below the league average of 2.0, with only 23% of league matches going Over 2.5 goals. In their last five matches, Coastal Union averaged 1.2 goals per game, while Kitayosce managed just 0.4, limiting the visitors’ attacking potential. Kitayosce conceded an average of 1.0 goal during this period, compared with 1.2 for Coastal Union, making a result in the 1–3 goal range the most likely outcome. Only 40% of the hosts’ last five matches and 20% of the visitors’ games produced at least 3 goals, while as many as 54% of league matches have seen at least one team keep a clean sheet. The hosts’ season data is incomplete, so greater weight should be placed on current form and the low league average, both of which clearly support Under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In their last five matches, Coastal Union have averaged 1.2 goals and 1.4 points per game, while Kitayosce have scored just 0.4 goals and recorded 0.8 points per game. The visitors have drawn as many as four of their last five matches, with 60% of those games level at half-time, which clearly strengthens the prospect of a draw at the break. Coastal Union average 0.6 goals after half-time, whereas Kitayosce concede 0.8 goals in the second half and have failed to win any of their last five second halves. The hosts led at the break in 40% of their recent matches, but the low scoring output from both sides before half-time—0.6 goals for Coastal Union and 0.2 for Kitayosce—points more towards a draw followed by a home turnaround.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Coastal UnionKitayosce
-1Shots-1
Coastal UnionKitayosce
-1Shots on target-1
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0xG0
Coastal UnionKitayosce
-1Corners-1
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0Dangerous attacks0
Coastal UnionKitayosce
-1Fouls-1
Coastal UnionKitayosce
-1Cards-1
Coastal UnionKitayosce

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Coastal UnionKitayosce
0.5Goals scored / match1
Coastal UnionKitayosce
2.5Goals conceded / match1.5
Coastal UnionKitayosce
14%Average possession50%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0.5Shots on target / match4
Coastal UnionKitayosce

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

1Shots per match11.5
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0.5Shots on target4
Coastal UnionKitayosce
50%Shot conversion8.7%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
14%Possession50%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0.53xG for1.68
Coastal UnionKitayosce
3.45xG against1.86
Coastal UnionKitayosce

Shooting quality

Coastal Union: Counter-attackingKitayosce: Balanced
Coastal UnionKitayosce
Accuracy (shots on target)50%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.530.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.000.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Coastal Union
LL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 0.53Opponent xG: 3.45BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Kitayosce
DL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

0.5 goals / match - Coastal Union · 1 goals / match - Kitayosce

Kitayosce is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.5 goals / match - Coastal Union · 1.5 goals / match - Kitayosce

Coastal Union scoring profile: very strong

Coastal Union scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Kitayosce scoring profile: very strong

Kitayosce scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Coastal Union keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

1Goals scored (season)2
Coastal UnionKitayosce
5Goals conceded (season)3
Coastal UnionKitayosce
3Average goals in match2.5
Coastal UnionKitayosce
1Goals scored (last 5)2
Coastal UnionKitayosce
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
Coastal UnionKitayosce

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0%2 goals0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0%3 goals0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0%4 goals0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
50%2 goals50%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
50%3 goals0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
50%4 goals0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0%Scored in both halves0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
50%BTTS - last 5100%
Coastal UnionKitayosce

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Coastal UnionKitayosce

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Coastal Union · 1.5 pts / match - Kitayosce

Coastal Union - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Kitayosce - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)1.5
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Coastal UnionKitayosce
1Goals conceded (1st half)1
Coastal UnionKitayosce
1Average goals (1st half)1.5
Coastal UnionKitayosce
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
100%No goal before half-time50%
Coastal UnionKitayosce

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Coastal UnionKitayosce
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Coastal UnionKitayosce
2Average goals (2nd half)1
Coastal UnionKitayosce
0%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Coastal UnionKitayosce
50%No goal after half-time50%
Coastal UnionKitayosce

Coastal Union - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kitayosce - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Coastal Union - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.500.00
Goals scored / match0.00.5
Goals conceded / match1.01.5
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.50
Goals scored / match0.50.5
Goals conceded / match1.00.5
Average goals in match1.51.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Coastal Union
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Coastal Union

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-2.92
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.92
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.95
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
29%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
250%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Coastal UnionLigaKitayosce
Average goals in match 3.002.71 2.50
Both teams scored 50%57% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%48% 50%
Clean sheets 0%21% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%81% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%81% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.71
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+71%
Home attack advantage
+42%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Coastal Union 0 - 2 - 0 Kitayosce. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Coastal Union vs Kitayosce?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Coastal Union 1:1 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Coastal Union and Kitayosce?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Coastal Union won 0, Kitayosce won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Coastal Union vs Kitayosce?

Coastal Union score 0.50 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.00. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Coastal Union's matches and 100% of Kitayosce's.

What form are Coastal Union and Kitayosce in?

Over the last 5 games Coastal Union have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and Kitayosce 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coastal Union vs Kitayosce?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Coastal Union vs Kitayosce: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.