Coastal Union vs Mtibwa Sugar: match statistics
Coastal Union vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Coastal Union played Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Coastal Union: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Mtibwa Sugar: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Coastal Union scores 0.71 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.82 and concedes 1.06. League average: 1.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Coastal Union 35%, Mtibwa Sugar 47%. Over 2.5: Coastal Union 24%, Mtibwa Sugar 35%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Coastal Union has higher xG: 1.09 vs 0.90. Coastal Union: 5.4 shots per match, Mtibwa Sugar: 3.6.
Match halves
Coastal Union: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.18. Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Coastal Union: 31-45+ (4 goals). Mtibwa Sugar: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Coastal Union are the favorites in this matchup at home: they average 1.00 goals per game at home with xG 1.29 and concede only 0.86 goals, while Mtibwa Sugar have just 0.14 goals per away game with xG 0.82. The hosts average 7.25 shots and 2.25 on target at home with a 14% conversion rate, whereas the visitors register only 4.17 shots and 2.17 on target per away game with merely 4% conversion. In the last 5 matches Coastal have scored 5 and conceded 8 (1W, 1D, 3L; PPG 0.8), and Mtibwa have 4 scored and 11 conceded (0W, 2D, 3L; PPG 0.4), indicating worse form and greater defensive vulnerability for the visitors. A key advantage for the hosts is that Mtibwa have not won away (Win% away = 0) and fail to score in 86% of away trips, while Coastal fail to score in only 14% of home matches. Considering the xG gap (1.29 vs 0.82), shot volume (7.25 vs 4.17) and conversion (14% vs 4%), I forecast a Coastal Union win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Pick: BTTS - Yes (65%) — Coastal Union at home has a seasonal BTTS rate of 70%, while Mtibwa has an 80% BTTS rate in the last 5 matches, indicating a high likelihood both teams will score. Coastal averages xG 0.98, 5.71 shots and 2.29 shots on target with a conversion rate of 20%, whereas Mtibwa posts xG 0.82, 4.17 shots and 2.17 on target with a 4% conversion, so the combined scoring chance is material (sum xG ≈1.80). In their last 5 matches Mtibwa conceded 11 goals (2.2 avg) and Coastal conceded 8 (1.6 avg), meaning both teams have been conceding recently; seasonal clean sheets are 30% for Coastal and 43% for Mtibwa, which partially mitigates this. A counterargument is Mtibwa’s low seasonal BTTS of only 14% and very poor shot conversion (4%), which reduces their scoring probability, but given recent form and the home side’s high BTTS rate I regard the 'Yes' scenario as stronger.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG- and defensive-statistics-based model yields expected goals of 1.37 for Coastal Union (attacking xG 0.98) and 1.01 for Mtibwa Sugar (attacking xG 0.82), combined 2.38 goals. A Poisson distribution with lambda=2.38 implies roughly a 69% chance of Over 1.5, ~42% for Over 2.5 and ~22% for Over 3.5; I adopt adjusted probabilities of 70%/45%/22% accounting for additional indicators. The home side record shows 80% of matches Over 1.5 and 50% Over 2.5, scoring on average 1.3 goals per game and converting 20% of shots with 5.71 shots per match, which boosts the likelihood of a higher total. Mtibwa display weaker efficiency (only 4% conversion and 4.17 shots per game) with a season Over 2.5 rate of 14% and BTTS 14%, limiting the probability of very high scores (Over 3.5 ~22%). Considering the combined 2.38 xG, the home Over 1.5 rate (80%) and the efficiency contrast 20% vs 4%, the best selection is Over 1.5 (over, line 1.5).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1) as the most likely scenario. Coastal Union drew at the break in 67% of their home matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 67%) and also recorded a 60% HT draw rate in their last 5 games, with a half-time goals average of 0.44 for the home side versus 0.0 for Mtibwa. The hosts score on average 1.3 goals per match compared to 0.14 for the visitors, have shot conversion rates of 20% vs 4% and xG of 0.98 against the visitors’ 0.82, giving them an advantage in creating and converting chances. Mtibwa practically do not score (0.14 goals on average and a season-long share of matches without a goal of 86%), so after a drawn first half the hosts have a greater chance of producing a turnaround in the second half. In light of these numbers X/1 is the strongest signal, while scenarios with the visitors leading at half-time appear unlikely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Coastal Union | Mtibwa Sugar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.56 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Coastal Union is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Coastal Union · 0.4 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mtibwa Sugar is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
0.71 goals / match - Coastal Union · 0.82 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar
Mtibwa Sugar is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.18 goals / match - Coastal Union · 1.06 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar
Coastal Union scores in 47% of matches (8 of 17 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).
Mtibwa Sugar scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Coastal Union keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Coastal Union
Over / Under - Mtibwa Sugar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Coastal Union is 110% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.24 pts / match - Coastal Union · 0.59 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Coastal Union - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Coastal Union
Mtibwa Sugar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Coastal Union | Liga | Mtibwa Sugar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.88 | 1.95 | • 1.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 35% | 32% | ▲ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 33% | ▲ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 42% | ▼ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 59% | 52% | ▲ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 53% | 59% | • 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Coastal Union 0 - 1 - 0 Mtibwa Sugar. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Coastal Union vs Mtibwa Sugar?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Coastal Union 1:1 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Coastal Union vs Mtibwa Sugar?
Coastal Union score 0.71 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.82. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Coastal Union's matches and 47% of Mtibwa Sugar's.
What form are Coastal Union and Mtibwa Sugar in?
Over the last 5 games Coastal Union have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coastal Union vs Mtibwa Sugar?
The statistical background for Coastal Union vs Mtibwa Sugar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


