Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueCairo International StadiumData current as of 21 October 2026

Coca-Cola vs ENPPI: match statistics

Coca-Cola crest
Coca-Cola
3 : 2half-time 3:2
ENPPI crest
ENPPI

Coca-Cola vs ENPPI: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Coca-Cola played ENPPI in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 12 October 2026. Venue: Cairo International Stadium. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Coca-Cola: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. ENPPI: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Coca-Cola scores 1.40 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. ENPPI scores 1.20 and concedes 1.80. League average: 2.06 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Coca-Cola 40%, ENPPI 80%. Over 2.5: Coca-Cola 20%, ENPPI 80%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 31%.

xG, shots and style

Coca-Cola has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.17. Coca-Cola: 14.2 shots per match, ENPPI: 10.4.

Match halves

Coca-Cola: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.20. ENPPI: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.20.

Goals by minute

Coca-Cola: 76-90+ (4 goals). ENPPI: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.06 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 31%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Coca-Cola sit 6th and have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while 16th-placed ENPPI have managed just 1 win over the same period. The hosts have won both of their matches at home so far, scoring an average of 2 goals and conceding 0.5, while the visitors are yet to win away and concede an average of 1.5 goals. Coca-Cola’s edge in chance creation is reflected in their home xG of 1.40 compared with ENPPI’s away xG of 0.79, as well as 14.5 shots per match against their opponents’ 6. The visitors have failed to score in half of their away matches, which, combined with the hosts’ solid defence, further boosts Coca-Cola’s chances of winning. However, the small sample size of two home matches and two away matches should be taken into account, so a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Coca-Cola average 1.33 goals at home and generate an xG of 1.43, making a goal from them fairly likely. The greater uncertainty concerns ENPPI: away from home, they generate just 0.79 xG and average 2 shots on target, compared with 4 for the hosts. The visitors have failed to score in 50% of their away matches, while Coca-Cola have conceded an average of just 0.8 goals across their last 5 matches. The main argument against BTTS - No is that both teams scored in 80% of ENPPI’s last 5 matches; however, the league rate for such outcomes is only 38%. Therefore, it is marginally more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Coca-Cola average 1.33 goals and 4 shots on target per match at home, while ENPPI concede an average of 1.5 goals away. The hosts have an xG of 1.43, and the visitors allow opponents chances worth an average of 1.52 xG, supporting the case for Coca-Cola to score at least once. On the other hand, the hosts concede an average of 2.0 goals at home, although ENPPI create chances worth just 0.79 xG away, making the visitors’ contribution to the scoreline less certain. All of Coca-Cola’s home matches so far have featured at least 2 goals, but this has occurred in 50% of ENPPI’s away matches; with a predicted total of 2.70 goals, Over 1.5 goals is therefore the safest choice rather than a higher line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: both teams were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, and Coca-Cola failed to score in the first half in 4 of those 5 games. The hosts’ recent form points to a win after the break: they have averaged 1.2 goals in the second half across their last 5 matches, while ENPPI have conceded an average of 1.4 during that period. Over the same span, Coca-Cola won 3 matches and ENPPI lost 3, strengthening the hosts’ advantage in the full-time result forecast. Caution is still warranted, however, as Coca-Cola have conceded an average of 1.67 goals after the break in their matches so far this season. Despite this, their improved recent results make a draw at half-time followed by a home win the strongest HT/FT scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

35Possession (%)65
Coca-ColaENPPI
9Shots24
Coca-ColaENPPI
5Shots on target6
Coca-ColaENPPI
1.15xG2.44
Coca-ColaENPPI
3Corners9
Coca-ColaENPPI
31Dangerous attacks71
Coca-ColaENPPI
15Fouls7
Coca-ColaENPPI
2Cards2
Coca-ColaENPPI

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match1.2
Coca-ColaENPPI
0.8Goals conceded / match1.8
Coca-ColaENPPI
46%Average possession44%
Coca-ColaENPPI
4.2Shots on target / match3.2
Coca-ColaENPPI

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.2Shots per match10.4
Coca-ColaENPPI
4.2Shots on target3.2
Coca-ColaENPPI
9.9%Shot conversion11.5%
Coca-ColaENPPI
46%Possession44%
Coca-ColaENPPI
1.51xG for1.17
Coca-ColaENPPI
1.45xG against1.62
Coca-ColaENPPI

Shooting quality

Coca-Cola: AttackingENPPI: Balanced
Coca-ColaENPPI
Accuracy (shots on target)30%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Coca-Cola is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Coca-Cola · 0.8 pts / match - ENPPI

Coca-Cola
DWLWW
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
ENPPI
LLDWL
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Coca-Cola is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Coca-Cola · 1.2 goals / match - ENPPI

Coca-Cola is 125% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Coca-Cola · 1.8 goals / match - ENPPI

Coca-Cola scoring profile: very strong

Coca-Cola scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while ENPPI keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

ENPPI scoring profile: strong

ENPPI scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Coca-Cola keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

7Goals scored (season)6
Coca-ColaENPPI
4Goals conceded (season)9
Coca-ColaENPPI
2.2Average goals in match3
Coca-ColaENPPI
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Coca-ColaENPPI
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
Coca-ColaENPPI

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal80%
Coca-ColaENPPI
60%2 goals40%
Coca-ColaENPPI
0%3 goals0%
Coca-ColaENPPI
0%4 goals0%
Coca-ColaENPPI

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal80%
Coca-ColaENPPI
20%2 goals60%
Coca-ColaENPPI
0%3 goals40%
Coca-ColaENPPI
0%4 goals0%
Coca-ColaENPPI

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time40%
Coca-ColaENPPI
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Coca-ColaENPPI
20%Scored in both halves0%
Coca-ColaENPPI

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS80%
Coca-ColaENPPI
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Coca-ColaENPPI
40%BTTS - last 580%
Coca-ColaENPPI

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Coca-ColaENPPI
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
Coca-ColaENPPI
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Coca-ColaENPPI

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Coca-ColaENPPI
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Coca-ColaENPPI
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Coca-ColaENPPI

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ENPPI is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Coca-Cola · 1.8 pts / match - ENPPI

Coca-Cola - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
ENPPI - half-time state
40% leading60% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.8
Coca-ColaENPPI
0.2Goals scored (1st half)1
Coca-ColaENPPI
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
Coca-ColaENPPI
0.4Average goals (1st half)1.4
Coca-ColaENPPI
80%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Coca-ColaENPPI
80%No goal before half-time40%
Coca-ColaENPPI

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)0.2
Coca-ColaENPPI
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
Coca-ColaENPPI
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
Coca-ColaENPPI
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Coca-ColaENPPI
40%Clean sheet after half-time20%
Coca-ColaENPPI
20%No goal after half-time80%
Coca-ColaENPPI

Coca-Cola - second-half results

60% W20% D20% L
6
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ENPPI - second-half results

0% W20% D80% L
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Coca-Cola - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
ENPPI - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.20
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+3-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Coca-Cola
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

ENPPI
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
3
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
126%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Coca-Cola

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
57% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
57%

ENPPI

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
191%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Coca-ColaLigaENPPI
Average goals in match▲ 2.202.06▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 40%38%▲ 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 20%31%▲ 80%
Clean sheets▲ 40%36%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▼ 40%48%▲ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%85%▼ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.06
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
0.94
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+-16%
Home attack advantage
+-19%
Home defence advantage
+-5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
48%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Coca-ColaYellow cardMohamed Sabry
  2. Coca-ColaGoalMahmoud Mamdouh MahmoudAssist: Kamel Kaboria
  3. ENPPISubstitutionOn: Mohamed EssamOff: Hamed Abdallah
  4. Coca-ColaYellow cardEba Tchecegna Arnold Adrien
  5. ENPPIYellow cardMohamed El Nahass
  6. ENPPIYellow cardZeyad Kamal
  7. ENPPISubstitutionOn: Hossam GhanemOff: Mohamed El Nahass
  8. Coca-ColaSubstitutionOn: Ali ZaazaaOff: Mahmoud Mamdouh Mahmoud

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Coca-Cola 0 - 1 - 0 ENPPI. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Coca-Cola
2 : 2
ENPPI

FAQ

What was the result of Coca-Cola vs ENPPI?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Coca-Cola 3:2 ENPPI. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Coca-Cola vs ENPPI?

Coca-Cola score 1.40 goals per game on average and ENPPI 1.20. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Coca-Cola's matches and 80% of ENPPI's.

What form are Coca-Cola and ENPPI in?

Over the last 5 games Coca-Cola have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and ENPPI 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coca-Cola vs ENPPI?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Coca-Cola vs ENPPI: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.