CODM Meknès vs FAR Rabat: match statistics
CODM Meknès vs FAR Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CODM Meknès play FAR Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 2 July 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
CODM Meknès: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. FAR Rabat: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
CODM Meknès scores 0.80 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. FAR Rabat scores 1.50 and concedes 0.73. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CODM Meknès 40%, FAR Rabat 50%. Over 2.5: CODM Meknès 33%, FAR Rabat 47%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
FAR Rabat has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.11. CODM Meknès: 9.1 shots per match, FAR Rabat: 11.7.
Match halves
CODM Meknès: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.60. FAR Rabat: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.90.
Goals by minute
CODM Meknès: 46-60 (9 goals). FAR Rabat: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
FAR Rabat holds a clear offensive and goalscoring advantage: 43 goals this season versus 20 for CODM, with average xG 1.68 (FAR) vs 1.12 (CODM). In the last five matches FAR scored 9 goals, recording 2 wins and 3 draws (0 losses) and averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas CODM managed only 4 goals in their last five, with no wins (0-2-3) and 0.4 points per game. The visitors create more chances: on the road they average 12.07 shots and 4.36 on target per match compared to the hosts’ 9.07 shots and 2.79 on target, and FAR’s 58% possession vs 50% also favors them. At the same time CODM defend well at home — only 0.64 goals conceded per match and 57% clean sheets — which may limit the margin of defeat. Considering FAR’s superiority in chance volume, xG and goalscoring record and CODM’s poor form (0 wins in last 5), I tip the visitors to win; I assess probabilities at roughly 60% for FAR, 25% for a draw and 15% for the hosts.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CODM Meknès | FAR Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FAR Rabat is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - CODM Meknès · 1.2 pts / match - FAR Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAR Rabat is 88% better for: goals scored per match.
0.8 goals / match - CODM Meknès · 1.5 goals / match - FAR Rabat
FAR Rabat is 51% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.1 goals / match - CODM Meknès · 0.73 goals / match - FAR Rabat
CODM Meknès scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while FAR Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).
FAR Rabat scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — CODM Meknès
Over / Under — FAR Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAR Rabat is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.9 pts / match - CODM Meknès · 1.43 pts / match - FAR Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CODM Meknès - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
FAR Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CODM Meknès
FAR Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| CODM Meknès | Liga | FAR Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.90 | 2.17 | • 2.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▲ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 30% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 63% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 73% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CODM Meknès 0 - 0 - 1 FAR Rabat. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CODM Meknès vs FAR Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished CODM Meknès 3:2 FAR Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CODM Meknès vs FAR Rabat?
CODM Meknès score 0.80 goals per game on average and FAR Rabat 1.50. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 40% of CODM Meknès's matches and 50% of FAR Rabat's.
What form are CODM Meknès and FAR Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games CODM Meknès have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FAR Rabat 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CODM Meknès vs FAR Rabat?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.