CODM Meknès vs Maghreb Fès: match statistics
CODM Meknès vs Maghreb Fès: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CODM Meknès played Maghreb Fès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
CODM Meknès: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Maghreb Fès: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
CODM Meknès scores 0.71 and concedes 0.76 goals per match. Maghreb Fès scores 1.65 and concedes 0.47. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CODM Meknès 24%, Maghreb Fès 41%. Over 2.5: CODM Meknès 18%, Maghreb Fès 29%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Maghreb Fès has higher xG: 1.20 vs 1.02. CODM Meknès: 8.4 shots per match, Maghreb Fès: 9.1.
Match halves
CODM Meknès: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.53. Maghreb Fès: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
CODM Meknès: 46-60 (4 goals). Maghreb Fès: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Maghreb Fès is the favorite in this match: they have 28 goals this season versus CODM Meknès’s 12, and in the last 5 matches they scored 10 goals while the home side managed only 2. The visitors are unbeaten in the league (0 losses, 10 wins, 7 draws); in their last 5 matches they recorded 4 wins and 1 draw, averaging 2.6 points per game. The hosts have 5 losses this season and in the last 5 matches they have 2 wins and 3 losses, averaging 1.2 points per game. Offensive metrics and quality of chances also favor Maghreb: away average shots on target 3.56 versus the hosts’ 2.89 and higher shooting accuracy 14% versus 12%, although average xG is similar (1.07 for the visitors vs 1.05 for the hosts). CODM’s advantage is a solid home defense: only 0.56 goals conceded per home game and 67% clean sheets, while the visitors concede 0.56 on the road and have 44% clean sheets, which reduces Fès’s edge and increases the likelihood of a draw. Considering 28 vs 12 goals this season, 2.6 vs 1.2 average points per game over the last 5 matches, and the visitors’ superior accuracy and shots on target, I predict a Maghreb Fès victory, although the hosts and their 67% clean sheets raise the probability of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The home side have recorded clean sheets in 75% of their matches this season and only 25% BTTS, while in their last 5 home appearances BTTS was 0% and they averaged 0.4 goals per game. The visitors have recently scored 10 goals in 5 games (2.0 on average) and have an recent xG of 1.37, so they represent a real attacking threat. However, the home side’s seasonal goals conceded average is only 0.38 per match and their season-long xG against is 1.17, indicating a strong defense that explains the high clean sheet rate. Considering the dominant defensive signal from the hosts (75% clean sheets and 0% BTTS in the last 5), even though the away team is likely to score, the stronger signal points to No Goal/No BTTS; I assess 'No' at 70% and 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes) at 30%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and attacking form indicate a moderate number of goals: home xG is 1.37 versus away defense xG 1.19 (forecast ~1.28 home goals), and away xG is 1.07 against home defense 1.17 (≈1.12 away goals), total xG ≈ 2.40. A Poisson model with mean 2.40 yields probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) ≈69%, Over 2.5 ≈43% and Over 3.5 ≈22%. Seasonal stats confirm that hosts score on average 2.13 goals at home, visitors 1.22 away; Over 1.5 occurred in 63% of home matches and 78% of away matches, but hosts have 75% clean sheets at home and a low BTTS rate of 25%. Considering the Poisson distribution, the high home xG and seasonal Over 1.5 frequencies, the strongest and most justified pick is Over 1.5 (bet: over, line: 1.5) with an estimated probability of ~69%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 because the home side lead at the break in 63% of their home matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 63%) and win at home in 75% of fixtures (winPercentage_home = 75%), which strongly favors a lead at half-time and an eventual Full-Time victory for CODM. On average the hosts score 0.75 goals by half-time and concede only 0.13 (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.75, concededAVGHT_home = 0.13), so the typical half-time score is 1-0. Over the full match they average 2.13 goals at home versus 1.22 for their opponents (seasonScoredAVG_home = 2.13 vs seasonScoredAVG_away = 1.22) and have a higher xG of 1.37 compared to 1.07 (xg_for_avg_home = 1.37 vs xg_for_avg_away = 1.07), confirming the hosts’ offensive advantage. Additionally, the home team keep clean sheets in 75% of season matches (seasonCSPercentage_home = 75%) and 88% of the time at half-time (seasonCSPercentageHT_home = 88%), while the away side have 56% of away games with both teams scoring (seasonBTTSPercentage_away = 56%), so the most likely outcome is the home team leading at half-time and winning at Full-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CODM Meknès | Maghreb Fès | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Maghreb Fès is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - CODM Meknès · 2.6 pts / match - Maghreb Fès
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maghreb Fès is 132% better for: goals scored per match.
0.71 goals / match - CODM Meknès · 1.65 goals / match - Maghreb Fès
Maghreb Fès is 62% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.76 goals / match - CODM Meknès · 0.47 goals / match - Maghreb Fès
CODM Meknès scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Maghreb Fès keeps a clean sheet in 59% (10 of 17 matches).
Maghreb Fès scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 53% (9 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CODM Meknès
Over / Under - Maghreb Fès
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maghreb Fès is 68% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / match - CODM Meknès · 1.88 pts / match - Maghreb Fès
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CODM Meknès - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Maghreb Fès - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CODM Meknès
Maghreb Fès
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| CODM Meknès | Liga | Maghreb Fès | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.47 | 2.17 | • 2.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 24% | 49% | ▼ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 18% | 39% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 53% | 32% | ▲ 59% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 24% | 59% | • 59% |
| Goal after half-time | • 76% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CODM Meknès 0 - 1 - 0 Maghreb Fès. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CODM Meknès vs Maghreb Fès?
The Botola Pro match finished CODM Meknès 0:0 Maghreb Fès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CODM Meknès vs Maghreb Fès?
CODM Meknès score 0.71 goals per game on average and Maghreb Fès 1.65. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 24% of CODM Meknès's matches and 41% of Maghreb Fès's.
What form are CODM Meknès and Maghreb Fès in?
Over the last 5 games CODM Meknès have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Maghreb Fès 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CODM Meknès vs Maghreb Fès?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CODM Meknès vs Maghreb Fès: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


