Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 22 July 2026

CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat: match statistics

CODM Meknès crest
CODM Meknès
1 : 1half-time 0:0
UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

CODM Meknès is displaying impressive home form with a 75% win rate and only one loss at their stadium this season. The hosts have won three of their last four home matches, keeping a clean sheet in 75% of home games, which demonstrates a solid defense. UTS Rabat has not won a single away match this season, drawing half and losing the other half of their away fixtures, with poor form in their last five matches (0.4 points per game). The visitors have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away game, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per match, while CODM Meknès scores an average of 1.25 goals in home games. The disparity in quality, particularly in the context of the hosts' home advantage and the visitors' complete lack of away wins, clearly points to a CODM Meknès victory. xG statistics also favor the hosts, who create more goal-scoring opportunities than UTS Rabat does in away matches.

CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CODM Meknès play UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 31 January 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

CODM Meknès: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CODM Meknès scores 0.80 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 1.07 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CODM Meknès 40%, UTS Rabat 63%. Over 2.5: CODM Meknès 33%, UTS Rabat 33%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

UTS Rabat has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.11. CODM Meknès: 9.1 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 9.5.

Match halves

CODM Meknès: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.60. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

CODM Meknès: 46-60 (9 goals). UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

CODM Meknès is displaying impressive home form with a 75% win rate and only one loss at their stadium this season. The hosts have won three of their last four home matches, keeping a clean sheet in 75% of home games, which demonstrates a solid defense. UTS Rabat has not won a single away match this season, drawing half and losing the other half of their away fixtures, with poor form in their last five matches (0.4 points per game). The visitors have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away game, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per match, while CODM Meknès scores an average of 1.25 goals in home games. The disparity in quality, particularly in the context of the hosts' home advantage and the visitors' complete lack of away wins, clearly points to a CODM Meknès victory. xG statistics also favor the hosts, who create more goal-scoring opportunities than UTS Rabat does in away matches.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
13Shots7
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
3Shots on target3
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
1.35xG0.87
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
6Corners3
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
44Dangerous attacks29
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
10Fouls10
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
3Cards2
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
0.8Goals scored / match1.07
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
1.1Goals conceded / match1.33
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
50%Average possession47%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
2.6Shots on target / match4.03
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.1Shots per match9.5
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
2.6Shots on target4.03
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
8.8%Shot conversion11.2%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
50%Possession47%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
1.11xG for1.3
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
1.36xG against1.35
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

Shooting quality

CODM Meknès: BalancedUTS Rabat: Balanced
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
Accuracy (shots on target)29%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UTS Rabat is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - CODM Meknès · 1.4 pts / match - UTS Rabat

CODM Meknès
LDDWL
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
UTS Rabat
LLDWW
Season result split
20% W43% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-13-11
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTS Rabat is 34% better for: goals scored per match.

0.8 goals / match - CODM Meknès · 1.07 goals / match - UTS Rabat

CODM Meknès is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.1 goals / match - CODM Meknès · 1.33 goals / match - UTS Rabat

CODM Meknès scoring profile: very strong

CODM Meknès scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

UTS Rabat scoring profile: strong

UTS Rabat scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).

24Goals scored (season)32
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
33Goals conceded (season)40
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
1.9Average goals in match2.4
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
7Goals scored (last 5)6
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal73%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
17%2 goals27%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
3%3 goals7%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal87%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
37%2 goals30%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
10%3 goals10%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
0%4 goals7%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time27%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
3%BTTS in both halves7%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
3%Scored in both halves13%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
80%BTTS - last 560%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTS Rabat is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / match - CODM Meknès · 1.17 pts / match - UTS Rabat

CODM Meknès - half-time state
10% leading60% draw30% trailing
UTS Rabat - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per match (1st half)1.17
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.5
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
0.7Average goals (1st half)1.07
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
67%Clean sheet before half-time57%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
83%No goal before half-time63%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.03
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1.33
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
47%Clean sheet after half-time37%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat
53%No goal after half-time50%
CODM MeknèsUTS Rabat

CODM Meknès - second-half results

30% W43% R27% P
27
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTS Rabat - second-half results

20% W43% R37% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CODM Meknès - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.20
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CODM Meknès
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
6
31-45
9
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
11
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
7
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CODM Meknès

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

CODM MeknèsLigaUTS Rabat
Average goals in match 1.902.17 2.40
Both teams scored 40%52% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%38% 33%
Clean sheets 37%30% 13%
Goal before half-time 43%63% 53%
Goal after half-time 73%73% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CODM Meknès 0 - 0 - 1 UTS Rabat. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat?

The Botola Pro match finished CODM Meknès 1:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat?

CODM Meknès score 0.80 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.07. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 40% of CODM Meknès's matches and 63% of UTS Rabat's.

What form are CODM Meknès and UTS Rabat in?

Over the last 5 games CODM Meknès have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and UTS Rabat 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat?

The statistical background for CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.