United States - MLSDick's Sporting Goods ParkData current as of 07 September 2026

Colorado Rapids vs FC Dallas: match statistics

Colorado Rapids crest
Colorado Rapids
1 : 2half-time 1:2
FC Dallas crest
FC Dallas

Colorado Rapids vs FC Dallas: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Colorado Rapids played FC Dallas in MLS (United States). The match was played on 24 May 2026. Venue: Dick's Sporting Goods Park. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Colorado Rapids: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. FC Dallas: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Colorado Rapids scores 1.71 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. FC Dallas scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.28 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Colorado Rapids 57%, FC Dallas 64%. Over 2.5: Colorado Rapids 57%, FC Dallas 64%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

FC Dallas has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.26. Colorado Rapids: 10.6 shots per match, FC Dallas: 12.8.

Match halves

Colorado Rapids: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.00. FC Dallas: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Colorado Rapids: 46-60 (5 goals). FC Dallas: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.28 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Dallas holds a slight edge going into this fixture, primarily due to form: the visitors have scored 11 goals and won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Colorado have scored 4 and won 2 of their last 5. In terms of chance quality the teams are nearly level: home xG averages 1.67 for Colorado and away xG 1.66 for FC Dallas, indicating a similar number of high-value opportunities. Colorado at home averages 2.8 goals per game, 55% possession and 19% shot accuracy, but concedes 1.4 goals per game and keeps a clean sheet in only 20% of matches. FC Dallas on the road registers more shots on target (6.8 vs 5.8), concedes 1.0 goal on average and records clean sheets in 40% of away matches, which combined with 11 goals in their last five gives them an advantage in attacking efficiency and defence. Given the comparable xG but clearly superior form of the visitors, I expect a narrow FC Dallas win; I estimate 45% probability for an away win, 35% for the home side and 20% for a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I forecast BTTS - Yes (65%) vs No (35%) because Colorado’s seasonal profile shows BTTS in 78% of matches and only 11% clean sheets at home, meaning opponents score against them in about 89% of games. FC Dallas has a seasonal BTTS of 40% and 40% clean sheets, but in the last 5 matches the visitors have 80% BTTS and average 2.2 goals per game (11 goals in 5 matches), with recent xG of 1.42, which significantly increases their likelihood of scoring. The counterargument is Colorado’s poor form: only 0.8 goals scored in the last 5 matches, a drop in xG to 0.94 and 20% BTTS in the same period, which limits confidence in the pick. Additionally, seasonal averages show Colorado concedes 1.78 goals per match and FC Dallas concedes 1.0, so it is easier for the visitors to find the net. Considering the home team’s high seasonal BTTS (78%), Dallas’s strong recent form (80% BTTS, 2.2 goals) and the overall league tendency of 61% BTTS, the Yes scenario is more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Average xG indicates 1.36 expected goals for Colorado (attacking xG 1.34 vs xG conceded to FC Dallas 1.37) and 1.41 for FC Dallas (attacking xG 1.66 vs xG conceded to Colorado 1.16), totaling 2.77 goals. This season Colorado has 67% of matches with Over 2.5 goals, FC Dallas 60%, and the league averages 3.26 goals per game, which supports the Over 2.5 side. Both teams average 2.0 goals per game this season (Colorado 2.0, Dallas 2.0) and generate 12.1 and 14.0 shots per game with conversion rates of 17% and 14%, increasing the likelihood of goals. At the same time, in the last 5 matches Colorado scored only 4 goals (0.8/game) while Dallas scored 11 (2.2/game), so Over 3.5 is assessed as less certain (approx. 48%). Therefore the best signal from the data is Over 2.5 (est. 68%), with a very high probability for Over 1.5 (approx. 92%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I select the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario draw at the break and away win (X/2) because FC Dallas has a 60% win rate this season compared to Colorado Rapids’ 33%, with average xG of 1.66 versus 1.34 and average shots on target 6.8 versus 4.0, indicating an away advantage. Additionally, the visitors have been level at the break in 60% of their matches, while the hosts have been trailing at the break in 44% of their games, which increases the probability of a draw at half-time. After the break FC Dallas scores on average 1.2 goals and wins second halves in about 60% of cases, whereas the Rapids score 0.89 goals after the break on average, so the visitors more often complete a turnaround after the interval. The hosts have higher shot conversion (17% versus 14%), and the Rapids record BTTS in 78% of matches, giving them chances to score in the first half, but FC Dallas’s superior quality and stronger second halves make X/2 the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
17Shots5
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
5Shots on target2
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
1.91xG0.55
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
5Corners3
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
67Dangerous attacks12
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
11Fouls13
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
5Cards3
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
1.71Goals scored / match2
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
1.57Goals conceded / match1.5
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
55%Average possession44%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
4.29Shots on target / match5
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.64Shots per match12.79
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
4.29Shots on target5
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
16.1%Shot conversion15.6%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
55%Possession44%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
1.26xG for1.45
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
1.42xG against1.23
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

Shooting quality

Colorado Rapids: Efficient finishingFC Dallas: Counter-attacking
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
Accuracy (shots on target)40%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FC Dallas is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Colorado Rapids · 1.8 pts / match - FC Dallas

Colorado Rapids
LLLWL
Season result split
36% W7% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-8
1.14 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
FC Dallas
LWWLW
Season result split
43% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-4
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Dallas is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.71 goals / match - Colorado Rapids · 2 goals / match - FC Dallas

FC Dallas is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.57 goals / match - Colorado Rapids · 1.5 goals / match - FC Dallas

Colorado Rapids scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Rapids scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while FC Dallas keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).

FC Dallas scoring profile: very strong

FC Dallas scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).

24Goals scored (season)28
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
22Goals conceded (season)21
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
3.29Average goals in match3.5
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
3Goals scored (last 5)11
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal79%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
43%2 goals64%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
21%3 goals43%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
21%4 goals14%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal79%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
50%2 goals50%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
29%3 goals21%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
0%4 goals0%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time50%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
0%BTTS in both halves29%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
29%Scored in both halves50%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
40%BTTS - last 580%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time64%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time43%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Colorado Rapids is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - Colorado Rapids · 1.07 pts / match - FC Dallas

Colorado Rapids - half-time state
36% leading29% draw36% trailing
FC Dallas - half-time state
21% leading43% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.07
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
0.71Goals scored (1st half)1
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)1
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
1.43Average goals (1st half)2
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
50%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
43%No goal before half-time36%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.64
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
1.86Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
36%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas
57%No goal after half-time36%
Colorado RapidsFC Dallas

Colorado Rapids - second-half results

36% W21% R43% P
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Dallas - second-half results

36% W57% R7% P
15
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding205%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Colorado Rapids - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
FC Dallas - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Colorado Rapids
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
4
31-45
5
1
46-60
5
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

FC Dallas
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
5
6
31-45
6
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.39
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Colorado Rapids

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

FC Dallas

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Colorado RapidsLigaFC Dallas
Average goals in match 3.293.28 3.50
Both teams scored 57%61% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%63% 64%
Clean sheets 21%22% 21%
Goal before half-time 79%77% 71%
Goal after half-time 79%81% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.28
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.93
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC DallasGoalLogan Farrington
  2. Colorado RapidsGoalPaxten AaronsonAssist: Georgi Minoungou
  3. FC DallasGoalSantiago Moreno
  4. FC DallasYellow cardLogan Farrington
  5. Colorado RapidsYellow cardLucas Herrington
  6. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Miguel Ángel Navarro ZárateOff: Jackson Travis
  7. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Connor Patrick RonanOff: Wayne Alix Frederick II
  8. Colorado RapidsYellow cardMiguel Ángel Navarro Zárate
  9. Colorado RapidsYellow cardPaxten Aaronson
  10. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Keegan RosenberryOff: Reginald Jacob Cannon
  11. FC DallasSubstitutionOn: Nicholas Gregory SimmondsOff: Logan Farrington
  12. FC DallasSubstitutionOn: Caleb SwannOff: Ramiro Moschen Benetti
  13. Colorado RapidsRed cardWayne Alix Frederick II
  14. FC DallasYellow cardSamuel Sarver

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ismail ElfathMatches officiated: 9
4.56Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 222%Home wins22%Draws56%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Colorado Rapids vs FC Dallas?

The MLS match finished Colorado Rapids 1:2 FC Dallas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Rapids vs FC Dallas?

Colorado Rapids score 1.71 goals per game on average and FC Dallas 2.00. The MLS average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Colorado Rapids's matches and 64% of FC Dallas's.

What form are Colorado Rapids and FC Dallas in?

Over the last 5 games Colorado Rapids have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and FC Dallas 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Rapids vs FC Dallas?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.