United States - MLSDick's Sporting Goods ParkData current as of 30 August 2026

Colorado Rapids vs Los Angeles FC: match statistics

Colorado Rapids vs Los Angeles FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Colorado Rapids played Los Angeles FC in MLS (United States). The match was played on 20 August 2026. Venue: Dick's Sporting Goods Park. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Colorado Rapids: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Los Angeles FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Colorado Rapids scores 1.53 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Los Angeles FC scores 1.75 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Colorado Rapids 47%, Los Angeles FC 40%. Over 2.5: Colorado Rapids 47%, Los Angeles FC 55%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Los Angeles FC has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.37. Colorado Rapids: 12.0 shots per match, Los Angeles FC: 13.3.

Match halves

Colorado Rapids: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.95. Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.90.

Goals by minute

Colorado Rapids: 76-90+ (7 goals). Los Angeles FC: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Colorado Rapids are clearly stronger at home, where they win 63% of their matches, score an average of 2.13 goals, and create chances worth 1.74 xG per game. Los Angeles FC average just 1.44 goals away from home, with an average xG of 1.50, while allowing opponents 1.44 xG. The hosts also register more shots per game (15.5 vs. 13.22) and enjoy a greater share of possession, 57% compared with 47%, which should translate into control of the game. Both teams have conceded just 3 goals in their last five matches, but LAFC drew 3 of those games, whereas Rapids won 3 times. Therefore, a home win is marginally more likely.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No scenario holds a slight edge, as Colorado kept a clean sheet in 70% of its matches, while BTTS occurred in only 30% of its games. This trend is supported by the hosts’ current form: they conceded just 3 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.6 per game, and both teams scored in only 20% of those fixtures. Los Angeles FC averages 1.44 goals and scored 1.6 goals per game over its last five matches, but will face Colorado’s highly resilient defence, which allows opponents an average xG of 1.15. In addition, the visitors have also conceded only 0.6 goals per game recently, while Colorado averaged 1.0 goal scored during this period, increasing the likelihood that at least one side will fail to score. Despite both teams’ high average xG figures of 1.51 and 1.50, their recent defensive performances and Colorado’s exceptionally low BTTS rate support the BTTS - No pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest form of both teams clearly lowers goal expectations: Colorado averaged 1.0 goal and Los Angeles FC 1.6 goals across their last five matches, while each side conceded just 0.6 goals per game. During the same period, only 20% of matches involving either team went over 2.5 goals, strongly supporting a scenario without a high-scoring game. Season-long data is more attacking, as Colorado averages 2.2 goals at home, but LAFC concedes only 1.11 goals away from home, while the hosts’ recent finishing has been noticeably weaker. Average xG stands at 1.51 for Colorado and 1.50 for LAFC, but current attacking xG has dropped to 1.35 and 1.20, respectively. The Under 3.5 goals line also holds an advantage because 78% of LAFC matches finished with a maximum of three goals, while the projected total of 2.30 goals remains clearly below this threshold.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Colorado Rapids win 70% of their home matches and average 2.20 goals, while Los Angeles FC win only 33% of their away games. The hosts make very strong starts: they held a lead at the break in 40% of matches, conceded just 0.20 goals per game before half-time, and kept a clean sheet at the interval in 90% of appearances. LAFC were trailing at half-time in as many as 44% of their away matches, scoring an average of only 0.56 goals before the break. Although both sides have almost identical average xG figures—1.51 for Colorado compared with 1.50 for LAFC—the hosts are clearly more clinical, converting 17% of their shots into goals compared with 11% for their opponents. Colorado’s last five matches more frequently produced a draw at half-time, making the X/1 scenario a significant alternative; however, the hosts’ early advantage and home record provide the strongest support for the 1/1 pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
13Shots10
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
4Shots on target2
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
1.43xG1.06
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
4Corners4
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
46Dangerous attacks40
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
14Fouls10
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
3Cards3
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
1.53Goals scored / match1.75
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
1.32Goals conceded / match1
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
56%Average possession46%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
4.11Shots on target / match4.4
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match13.35
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
4.11Shots on target4.4
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
12.7%Shot conversion13.1%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
56%Possession46%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
1.37xG for1.49
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
1.31xG against1.46
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

Shooting quality

Colorado Rapids: BalancedLos Angeles FC: Counter-attacking
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Los Angeles FC is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Colorado Rapids · 2 pts / match - Los Angeles FC

Colorado Rapids
LWLWW
Season result split
42% W5% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-10
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Los Angeles FC
WWWDL
Season result split
50% W20% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-6
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Los Angeles FC is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Colorado Rapids · 1.75 goals / match - Los Angeles FC

Los Angeles FC is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.32 goals / match - Colorado Rapids · 1 goals / match - Los Angeles FC

Colorado Rapids scoring profile: mixed

Colorado Rapids scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 55% (11 of 20 matches).

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).

29Goals scored (season)35
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
25Goals conceded (season)20
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
2.84Average goals in match2.75
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
5Goals scored (last 5)11
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal85%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
37%2 goals45%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
16%3 goals25%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
16%4 goals10%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal45%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
42%2 goals30%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
21%3 goals15%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
0%4 goals10%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time10%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
21%Scored in both halves30%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
20%BTTS - last 540%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Los Angeles FC is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Colorado Rapids · 1.45 pts / match - Los Angeles FC

Colorado Rapids - half-time state
26% leading42% draw32% trailing
Los Angeles FC - half-time state
35% leading40% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.45
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.85
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.2
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
58%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
53%No goal before half-time55%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per match (2nd half)1.7
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
0.95Goals scored (2nd half)0.9
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.55
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
47%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC
53%No goal after half-time30%
Colorado RapidsLos Angeles FC

Colorado Rapids - second-half results

42% W21% R37% P
23
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

45% W35% R20% P
29
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Colorado Rapids - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.40
Goals scored / match1.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+80
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Colorado Rapids
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
1
46-60
6
5
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
8
2
31-45
4
6
46-60
7
2
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Colorado Rapids

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Colorado RapidsLigaLos Angeles FC
Average goals in match 2.843.19 2.75
Both teams scored 47%62% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%61% 55%
Clean sheets 32%21% 55%
Goal before half-time 63%76% 60%
Goal after half-time 79%81% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Los Angeles FCYellow cardYevgen Cheberko
  2. Los Angeles FCGoalJeremy Ebobisse
  3. Colorado RapidsYellow cardYoussef Maziz
  4. Los Angeles FCYellow cardEddie Livington Segura Martínez
  5. Los Angeles FCYellow cardNkosi Burgess
  6. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Aaron Ray LongOff: Nkosi Burgess
  7. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Georgi MinoungouOff: Youssef Maziz
  8. Colorado RapidsYellow cardDarren Yapi
  9. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Dante SealyOff: Darren Yapi
  10. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Marky DelgadoOff: Ryan Hollingshead
  11. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Tommy MihalicOff: Tyler Dominic Boyd
  12. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Kosi ThompsonOff: Hamzat Basit Ojediran
  13. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Noah CobbOff: Miguel Ángel Navarro Zárate
  14. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Ryan RaposoOff: Ryan Porteous
  15. Colorado RapidsYellow cardKosi Thompson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Colorado Rapids 0 - 1 - 0 Los Angeles FC. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Colorado Rapids vs Los Angeles FC?

The MLS match finished Colorado Rapids 1:0 Los Angeles FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Rapids vs Los Angeles FC?

Colorado Rapids score 1.53 goals per game on average and Los Angeles FC 1.75. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Colorado Rapids's matches and 40% of Los Angeles FC's.

What form are Colorado Rapids and Los Angeles FC in?

Over the last 5 games Colorado Rapids have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Los Angeles FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Rapids vs Los Angeles FC?

The statistical background for Colorado Rapids vs Los Angeles FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.