United States - MLSData current as of 23 July 2026

Colorado Rapids vs Portland Timbers: match statistics

130%(2.28)
X25%(3.85)
245%(3.01)

Portland Timbers clearly surpass Colorado Rapids in terms of form and results. The visitors started the season with a victory (1-0-0), scoring 3 goals and conceding only 2, while the hosts lost their only match (0-0-1) without scoring a single goal. Analysis of the last 5 matches confirms Portland's advantage with 1.4 points per match and 'wldlw' form compared to Colorado's mere 0.4 points with a 'ldldl' streak. The visitors scored 9 goals in the last 5 meetings against just 4 for the hosts, indicating significantly better offensive efficiency. Although both teams have had defensive issues in recent matches, Portland presents better disposition and effectiveness, giving them a real chance of achieving an away victory.

Colorado Rapids vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Colorado Rapids play Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match date is 28 February 2026 at 22:30. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Colorado Rapids: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Portland Timbers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Colorado Rapids scores 1.67 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.80 and concedes 1.93. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Colorado Rapids 60%, Portland Timbers 67%. Over 2.5: Colorado Rapids 60%, Portland Timbers 67%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Timbers has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.31. Colorado Rapids: 11.1 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 12.7.

Match halves

Colorado Rapids: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.93. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Colorado Rapids: 0-15 (5 goals). Portland Timbers: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Portland Timbers clearly surpass Colorado Rapids in terms of form and results. The visitors started the season with a victory (1-0-0), scoring 3 goals and conceding only 2, while the hosts lost their only match (0-0-1) without scoring a single goal. Analysis of the last 5 matches confirms Portland's advantage with 1.4 points per match and 'wldlw' form compared to Colorado's mere 0.4 points with a 'ldldl' streak. The visitors scored 9 goals in the last 5 meetings against just 4 for the hosts, indicating significantly better offensive efficiency. Although both teams have had defensive issues in recent matches, Portland presents better disposition and effectiveness, giving them a real chance of achieving an away victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
24Shots12
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
9Shots on target3
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
2.43xG1.22
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
12Corners6
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
41Dangerous attacks35
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
7Fouls8
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
2Cards4
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
1.67Goals scored / match1.8
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
1.6Goals conceded / match1.93
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
56%Average possession50%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
4.33Shots on target / match4.8
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.07Shots per match12.67
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
4.33Shots on target4.8
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
15.1%Shot conversion14.2%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
56%Possession50%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
1.31xG for1.46
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
1.36xG against2.01
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

Shooting quality

Colorado Rapids: Efficient finishingPortland Timbers: Efficient finishing
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
Accuracy (shots on target)39%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Colorado Rapids · 1.4 pts / match - Portland Timbers

Colorado Rapids
LLWLL
Season result split
33% W7% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-9
1.07 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Portland Timbers
WDLLW
Season result split
33% W13% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Portland Timbers is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - Colorado Rapids · 1.8 goals / match - Portland Timbers

Colorado Rapids is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Colorado Rapids · 1.93 goals / match - Portland Timbers

Colorado Rapids scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Rapids scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).

Portland Timbers scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

25Goals scored (season)27
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
24Goals conceded (season)29
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
3.27Average goals in match3.73
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
3Goals scored (last 5)14
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal73%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
40%2 goals53%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
20%3 goals20%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
20%4 goals13%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal93%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
53%2 goals67%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
27%3 goals27%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
0%4 goals7%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 15 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time40%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
27%Scored in both halves47%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
40%BTTS - last 560%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Colorado Rapids is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Colorado Rapids · 1.2 pts / match - Portland Timbers

Colorado Rapids - half-time state
33% leading27% draw40% trailing
Portland Timbers - half-time state
33% leading20% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.2
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
0.73Goals scored (1st half)1
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)1.13
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
1.53Average goals (1st half)2.13
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
47%Clean sheet before half-time27%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
40%No goal before half-time33%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1.33
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
40%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers
60%No goal after half-time47%
Colorado RapidsPortland Timbers

Colorado Rapids - second-half results

33% W27% R40% P
19
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portland Timbers - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
18
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Colorado Rapids - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.40.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.2
Average goals in match2.81.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Colorado Rapids
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
1
46-60
5
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
4
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Colorado Rapids

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Colorado RapidsLigaPortland Timbers
Average goals in match 3.273.31 3.73
Both teams scored 60%61% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%63% 67%
Clean sheets 20%22% 7%
Goal before half-time 80%77% 100%
Goal after half-time 73%80% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Colorado Rapids vs Portland Timbers?

The MLS match finished Colorado Rapids 2:0 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Rapids vs Portland Timbers?

Colorado Rapids score 1.67 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.80. The MLS average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Colorado Rapids's matches and 67% of Portland Timbers's.

What form are Colorado Rapids and Portland Timbers in?

Over the last 5 games Colorado Rapids have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Portland Timbers 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Rapids vs Portland Timbers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.