United States - MLSDick's Sporting Goods ParkData current as of 14 October 2026

Colorado Rapids vs Sporting KC: match statistics

Colorado Rapids crest
Colorado Rapids
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Sporting KC crest
Sporting KC

Colorado Rapids vs Sporting KC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Colorado Rapids played Sporting KC in MLS (United States). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Venue: Dick's Sporting Goods Park. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Colorado Rapids: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Sporting KC: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Colorado Rapids scores 1.50 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Sporting KC scores 1.00 and concedes 2.56. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Colorado Rapids 50%, Sporting KC 61%. Over 2.5: Colorado Rapids 50%, Sporting KC 83%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Colorado Rapids has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.15. Colorado Rapids: 11.1 shots per match, Sporting KC: 9.3.

Match halves

Colorado Rapids: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.89. Sporting KC: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Colorado Rapids: 76-90+ (6 goals). Sporting KC: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Colorado Rapids have a clearly stronger home record: they win 63% of their matches, score an average of 2.13 goals, and concede just 1.13 goals per game. Sporting KC lose as many as 78% of their away matches, score only 0.78 goals, and their defense concedes an average of 3.22 goals. The hosts create more high-quality chances, as reflected by an xG of 1.74 compared with the visitors’ 1.04, while also averaging 15.5 shots per match against 8.78 for their opponents. KC have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away match and have failed to score in 56% of such fixtures, significantly limiting their chances of securing a positive result. Current form also favors the Rapids, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Sporting KC have suffered 4 defeats during that period and conceded 12 goals.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Sporting KC has a clear problem in front of goal, scoring an average of just 0.78 goals per match and failing to score in 56% of its games this season. Colorado has not kept a clean sheet all season, but its current defensive form looks significantly better: it has conceded just 3 goals in its last 5 matches, or 0.6 per game. The hosts are strongly favoured to score, as their opponents concede an average of 3.22 goals per match, including 2.4 across their last five outings. The case for a BTTS - No outcome is further strengthened by Colorado’s BTTS rate dropping to 20% over its last 5 fixtures, compared with 78% for the season as a whole. Although Sporting KC recently recorded an xG of 1.34, almost identical to Colorado’s 1.35, the visitors’ poor season-long finishing and the hosts’ defensive improvement give a slight edge to the BTTS - No pick. This means that at least one team is expected not to score; it does not automatically imply a 0:0 result or that neither team will find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as at least 2 goals were scored in 89% of Colorado’s matches and in 100% of Sporting Kansas City’s. Sporting KC concede as many as 3.22 goals per match on average, with 1.83 xG allowed to opponents, which clearly strengthens the hosts’ outlook, as they average 5.22 shots on target. Colorado have also failed to keep a single clean sheet, while their season average for goals conceded stands at 1.89, although their last five matches have improved this figure to 0.6. The hosts’ recent form has been more cautious, with only 20% of their last five matches going Over 2.5 goals, making the 2.5 line riskier despite the visitors’ poor defence. The projected total of 2.80 goals gives a clear edge to Over 1.5, while the most likely outcome remains a range of 2-3 goals rather than a very high-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest-looking HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Colorado win at full-time, as the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches, while Sporting Kansas City were trailing at half-time in 60% of that same sample. Colorado conceded just 0.4 goals before the break and 0.2 after it across their last five games, whereas the visitors allowed opponents to average 1.4 goals in the first half alone. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in their current form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Sporting KC have lost 4 of 5 and conceded an average of 2.4 goals per game. Across the season as a whole, the Kansas City side have conceded as many as 3.22 goals per match, compared with Colorado’s 1.89, while the hosts average 5.22 shots on target to the visitors’ 2.67. Colorado’s low first-half scoring average of 0.6 goals across their last five appearances points towards a cautious opening, but the visitors’ poor defensive record should give the hosts the upper hand after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

75Possession (%)25
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
28Shots6
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
4Shots on target3
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
2.55xG0.69
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
8Corners2
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
71Dangerous attacks13
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
12Fouls12
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
1Cards6
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Colorado RapidsSporting KC
1.5Goals scored / match1
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
1.39Goals conceded / match2.56
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
55%Average possession44%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
4.11Shots on target / match3.94
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.11Shots per match9.28
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
4.11Shots on target3.94
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
13.5%Shot conversion10.8%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
55%Possession44%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
1.3xG for1.15
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
1.35xG against1.81
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

Shooting quality

Colorado Rapids: Efficient finishingSporting KC: Balanced
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
Accuracy (shots on target)37%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Colorado Rapids is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Colorado Rapids · 0.6 pts / match - Sporting KC

Colorado Rapids
LLWLW
Season result split
39% W6% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-10
1.22 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Sporting KC
LLWLL
Season result split
22% W11% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-12
0.78 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Colorado Rapids is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Colorado Rapids · 1 goals / match - Sporting KC

Colorado Rapids is 84% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.39 goals / match - Colorado Rapids · 2.56 goals / match - Sporting KC

Colorado Rapids scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Rapids scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Sporting KC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 18 matches).

Sporting KC scoring profile: strong

Sporting KC scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).

27Goals scored (season)18
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
25Goals conceded (season)46
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
2.89Average goals in match3.56
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
5Goals conceded (last 5)12
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal61%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
33%2 goals33%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
17%3 goals6%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
17%4 goals0%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal100%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
44%2 goals67%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
22%3 goals50%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
0%4 goals22%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time22%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
22%Scored in both halves22%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS28%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
40%BTTS - last 560%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time89%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time56%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time28%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
28%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Colorado Rapids is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - Colorado Rapids · 0.72 pts / match - Sporting KC

Colorado Rapids - half-time state
28% leading39% draw33% trailing
Sporting KC - half-time state
17% leading22% draw61% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)0.72
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)1.33
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
1.28Average goals (1st half)1.78
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
56%Clean sheet before half-time28%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
50%No goal before half-time61%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.39Points per match (2nd half)0.89
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
0.72Goals conceded (2nd half)1.22
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
1.61Average goals (2nd half)1.78
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
44%Clean sheet after half-time28%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC
56%No goal after half-time56%
Colorado RapidsSporting KC

Colorado Rapids - second-half results

39% W22% D39% L
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sporting KC - second-half results

17% W39% D44% L
13
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.72
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Colorado Rapids - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Sporting KC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.41.0
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Colorado Rapids
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
1
46-60
5
5
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Sporting KC
ScoredConceded
0
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
5
11
31-45
3
5
46-60
4
9
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Colorado Rapids

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Sporting KC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.90
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Colorado RapidsLigaSporting KC
Average goals in match▼ 2.893.21▲ 3.56
Both teams scored▼ 50%62%• 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%61%▲ 83%
Clean sheets▲ 28%21%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%77%▲ 89%
Goal after half-time▼ 78%80%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.88
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sporting KCYellow cardZohran Ludovic Bassong
  2. Sporting KCRed cardKwaku Agyabeng
  3. Sporting KCSubstitutionOn: Jacob BartlettOff: Magomed Suleymanov
  4. Sporting KCSubstitutionOn: Ian JamesOff: Zohran Ludovic Bassong
  5. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Youssef MazizOff: Wayne Alix Frederick II
  6. Sporting KCSubstitutionOn: Wyatt MeyerOff: Or Blorian
  7. Sporting KCYellow cardMagomed Suleymanov
  8. Colorado RapidsGoalReginald Jacob CannonAssist: Youssef Maziz
  9. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Darren YapiOff: Dante Sealy
  10. Colorado RapidsYellow cardJoshua Atencio
  11. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Hamzat Basit OjediranOff: Georgi Minoungou
  12. Sporting KCYellow cardMoisés Castillo Mosquera
  13. Sporting KCYellow cardMoisés Castillo Mosquera
  14. Colorado RapidsGoalRafael Navarro LealAssist: Paxten Aaronson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Colorado Rapids 1 - 0 - 0 Sporting KC. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Colorado Rapids vs Sporting KC?

The MLS match finished Colorado Rapids 2:0 Sporting KC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Rapids vs Sporting KC?

Colorado Rapids score 1.50 goals per game on average and Sporting KC 1.00. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Colorado Rapids's matches and 61% of Sporting KC's.

What form are Colorado Rapids and Sporting KC in?

Over the last 5 games Colorado Rapids have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sporting KC 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Rapids vs Sporting KC?

The statistical background for Colorado Rapids vs Sporting KC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.