United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 17 October 2026

Colorado Springs vs El Paso Locomotive: match statistics

Colorado Springs vs El Paso Locomotive: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Colorado Springs played El Paso Locomotive in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Colorado Springs: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. El Paso Locomotive: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Colorado Springs scores 1.60 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. El Paso Locomotive scores 1.60 and concedes 1.35. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Colorado Springs 65%, El Paso Locomotive 55%. Over 2.5: Colorado Springs 60%, El Paso Locomotive 60%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.54. Colorado Springs: 16.4 shots per match, El Paso Locomotive: 12.9.

Match halves

Colorado Springs: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 1.10. El Paso Locomotive: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Colorado Springs: 76-90+ (11 goals). El Paso Locomotive: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-4-0. Average goals 2.80, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Colorado Springs have a clear home advantage: they win 60% of their home matches, score an average of 2.1 goals, and create chances worth 2.15 xG per game. At home, the hosts register as many as 19.1 shots, including 6.2 on target, while El Paso average 12 attempts and 4.45 shots on target away from home. However, El Paso arrive in excellent form, with 4 wins in their last 5 matches and only 2 goals conceded during that period. The visitors’ main concern remains their away inconsistency: they lose 36% of their matches on the road, while their average xG against stands at 1.55, significantly higher than Colorado Springs’ 0.85 at home. A closely contested match is expected, but the hosts’ greater attacking intensity and effectiveness at their own stadium marginally favour a Colorado Springs win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - No comes from El Paso’s current form: none of their last five matches featured goals from both teams, and the team conceded just 2 goals, averaging 0.4 per game. Colorado Springs averaged 1.2 goals scored during this period, but they will face an opponent conceding just 1.0 goal per game across the season and keeping a clean sheet in 27% of matches. The hosts score consistently, having failed to score in none of their matches this season, while their latest xG stands at a high 2.27, so the BTTS scenario remains realistic. Nevertheless, El Paso have won four of their last five appearances and boast a significantly stronger defence than Colorado, who concede an average of 1.78 goals. Therefore, a match in which at least one team fails to score is the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The season profiles of both teams support at least two goals: Colorado Springs have gone over 1.5 goals in 78% of their matches, compared with 82% for El Paso Locomotive. The hosts score an average of 1.56 goals per match, while the visitors average 1.64, with Colorado Springs conceding as many as 1.78 goals per game. Chance-quality data also points to an open game, with average xG figures of 1.63 for the hosts and 1.46 for the visitors. El Paso have conceded only 2 goals in their last five matches, which reduces confidence in Over 2.5, but both teams have posted high average xG figures during this period: 2.27 and 2.16, respectively. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, as it combines both teams’ season-long consistency with a projected total of 2.69 goals in the match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

El Paso Locomotive are showing significantly better current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.4 points per game compared with Colorado Springs’ 1.4. The visitors were leading at the break in 80% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 1.2 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.2, while the hosts were level at half-time in each of those games. El Paso’s advantage is also evident in their season-long defensive record, as they concede an average of 1.00 goal per match compared with Colorado Springs’ 1.78, while over the last five rounds these figures stand at 0.4 and 1.4 respectively. Colorado Springs have the higher underlying xG, 1.63 compared with 1.46, but they have recently been scoring only 1.2 goals per match. Therefore, the strongest scenario is for the visitors to lead at the break and maintain their advantage through the final whistle: HT/FT 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
14Shots14
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
5Shots on target3
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
1.69xG1.49
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
7Corners3
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
64Dangerous attacks56
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
7Fouls12
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
2Cards2
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
1.6Goals scored / match1.6
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
1.55Goals conceded / match1.35
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
55%Average possession49%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
4.5Shots on target / match4.85
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.45Shots per match12.95
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
4.5Shots on target4.85
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
9.7%Shot conversion12.4%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
55%Possession49%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
1.81xG for1.54
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
1.09xG against1.41
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

Shooting quality

Colorado Springs: DominantEl Paso Locomotive: Balanced
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
Accuracy (shots on target)27%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

El Paso Locomotive is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Colorado Springs · 2.4 pts / match - El Paso Locomotive

Colorado Springs
WLLWL
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-8
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.24Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
El Paso Locomotive
WLWWW
Season result split
45% W20% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-7
1.55 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 2.16Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

El Paso Locomotive is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.55 goals / match - Colorado Springs · 1.35 goals / match - El Paso Locomotive

Colorado Springs scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Springs scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while El Paso Locomotive keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 matches).

El Paso Locomotive scoring profile: very strong

El Paso Locomotive scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 matches).

32Goals scored (season)32
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
31Goals conceded (season)27
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
3.15Average goals in match2.95
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
9Goals conceded (last 5)2
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal85%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
55%2 goals50%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
25%3 goals20%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
5%4 goals5%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal70%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
50%2 goals40%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
15%3 goals15%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
0%4 goals10%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
Colorado Springs - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 20 matches
55%
El Paso Locomotive - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 20 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

35%BTTS at half-time30%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
20%BTTS in both halves15%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
30%Scored in both halves40%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
60%BTTS - last 50%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time90%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

El Paso Locomotive is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / match - Colorado Springs · 1.6 pts / match - El Paso Locomotive

Colorado Springs - half-time state
10% leading75% draw15% trailing
El Paso Locomotive - half-time state
45% leading25% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1.6
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
1Average goals (1st half)1.65
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
55%No goal before half-time30%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.15
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
1.1Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
1.05Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
2.15Average goals (2nd half)1.3
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
25%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive
40%No goal after half-time45%
Colorado SpringsEl Paso Locomotive

Colorado Springs - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding400%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

El Paso Locomotive - second-half results

25% W40% D35% L
32
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Colorado Springs - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.82.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
El Paso Locomotive - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.20
Goals scored / match1.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.40.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+50
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Colorado Springs
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
5
4
31-45
7
4
46-60
4
8
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

El Paso Locomotive
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
7
4
16-30
7
6
31-45
8
3
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.05
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Colorado Springs

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

El Paso Locomotive

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.85
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Colorado SpringsLigaEl Paso Locomotive
Average goals in match▲ 3.152.68▲ 2.95
Both teams scored▲ 65%53%▲ 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%48%▲ 60%
Clean sheets▼ 10%28%▲ 30%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%65%▲ 90%
Goal after half-time▲ 95%78%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. El Paso LocomotiveYellow cardAlexis Méndez
  2. Colorado SpringsYellow cardJon-Talen Maples
  3. El Paso LocomotiveYellow cardArturo Ortíz Martínez
  4. Colorado SpringsYellow cardJuan Tejada
  5. Colorado SpringsSubstitutionOn: Devon Chesterton WilliamsOff: Frank Daroma
  6. El Paso LocomotiveSubstitutionOn: Roberto AvilaOff: Amando Miguel Moreno
  7. Colorado SpringsSubstitutionOn: Jonas FjeldbergOff: Bryce Jamison
  8. El Paso LocomotiveSubstitutionOn: Zyen JonesOff: Rubio Yovani Mu00e9ndez Rubin
  9. El Paso LocomotiveSubstitutionOn: Guillermo DiazOff: Alexis Méndez
  10. Colorado SpringsGoalJabari Coteau
  11. Colorado SpringsSubstitutionOn: Steven EchevarriaOff: Brennan Creek

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Colorado Springs 1 - 4 - 0 El Paso Locomotive. Average goals 2.80, both teams scored in 80% matches.

El Paso Locomotive
2 : 2
Colorado Springs
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
1 : 1
El Paso Locomotive FC
El Paso Locomotive FC
2 : 2
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
El Paso Locomotive
1 : 1
Colorado Springs
Colorado Springs
2 : 0
El Paso Locomotive

FAQ

What was the result of Colorado Springs vs El Paso Locomotive?

The USL Championship match finished Colorado Springs 0:1 El Paso Locomotive. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Colorado Springs and El Paso Locomotive?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Colorado Springs won 1, El Paso Locomotive won 0 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Springs vs El Paso Locomotive?

Colorado Springs score 1.60 goals per game on average and El Paso Locomotive 1.60. The USL Championship average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Colorado Springs's matches and 55% of El Paso Locomotive's.

What form are Colorado Springs and El Paso Locomotive in?

Over the last 5 games Colorado Springs have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and El Paso Locomotive 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Springs vs El Paso Locomotive?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Colorado Springs vs El Paso Locomotive: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.