United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 07 September 2026

Colorado Springs vs Lexington: match statistics

Colorado Springs crest
Colorado Springs
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Lexington crest
Lexington

Colorado Springs vs Lexington: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Colorado Springs played Lexington in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Colorado Springs: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match. Lexington: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Colorado Springs scores 1.75 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Lexington scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Colorado Springs 75%, Lexington 25%. Over 2.5: Colorado Springs 75%, Lexington 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.36. Colorado Springs: 14.3 shots per match, Lexington: 13.0.

Match halves

Colorado Springs: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50. Lexington: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Colorado Springs: 46-60 (2 goals). Lexington: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (1): Colorado Springs average 3.0 goals per home match with an average xG of 2.38, attempt 21 shots per game with 8 on target and hold 63% possession, and have recorded a 100% home win rate. Lexington away average 0.0 goals per match, have a 100% share of games without scoring, attempt 12 shots (3 on target) with xG 1.41, indicating significant problems finishing chances on the road. In the last 5 matches overall the visitors scored 12 goals vs. 9 for the hosts, but both teams have a similar points average of 1.4 over the last five fixtures, so the advantage mainly stems from Colorado’s home stats. Defensively both teams concede on average 2.0 goals in their respective contexts; however, Colorado concedes a lower average xG against at home (0.94 vs. 1.33 for Lexington away) and displays far better shot conversion (14% conversion for the hosts vs. 0% for the visitors), which gives them a real edge and higher probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal stats indicate Colorado Springs scores 1.33 goals and concedes 0.67 per match, recording a clean sheet in 67% of games; Lexington has 4 goals for and 4 against this season, averaging 2.0 conceded per match, and an away-season BTTS rate of 0%. However, in the last 5 matches hosts average 1.8 goals for and 1.4 against with xG 2.15, while visitors average 2.4 for and 0.8 against with xG 1.94, showing both teams have generated scoring opportunities in the short term. Shot data shows hosts average 13.33 shots and 4.0 on target per match with a 10% conversion, whereas visitors average 12.0 shots and 3.0 on target with 0% conversion, suggesting visitors struggle to finish chances. Given the strong defensive signal from the hosts (67% clean sheets and only 33% seasonal BTTS for Colorado Springs) and Lexington’s zero-season BTTS rate, the more likely scenario is BTTS - No; I assess probability at 70% for No and 30% for Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project a total goals figure of approximately 2.87: Colorado Springs 1.51 xG vs Lexington 1.36, providing a strong signal for the Over. In the last 5 matches Colorado Springs averaged 1.8 goals while Lexington averaged 2.4; their recent xG were 2.15 (home) and 1.94 (away), indicating active offense from both sides. Seasonal xG is 1.34 for the home team and 1.41 for the visitors, with xG conceded at 1.23 and 1.33 respectively, so seasonal profiles also point to an even but goal-prone matchup. Additionally the home side registered Over 1.5 in 67% of matches, and the visitors in 100% of matches, against a league average of 2.72 goals; on this basis I estimate a 78% probability of Over 1.5. Consequently I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest play (Over 2.5 ~55%, Over 3.5 ~32%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Colorado Springs win at full-time (X/1). Colorado Springs were level at the break in 67% of home matches and have kept a clean sheet at half-time in 100% of home fixtures, suggesting first halves often finish 0-0 or with a minimal scoreline. In second halves the hosts average 1.67 goals and 1.33 points, while Lexington have yet to score this season (0.0 average) and concede 2.0 goals per match, with 0.0 points in second halves. Additionally, Colorado averages 4.0 shots on target versus the visitors' 3.0 and has a conversion rate of 10% compared to Lexington’s 0%, despite similar xG (1.34 vs 1.41), so I expect a draw at the break and a decisive home-goal turnaround after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Colorado SpringsLexington
14Shots8
Colorado SpringsLexington
2Shots on target3
Colorado SpringsLexington
1.51xG1
Colorado SpringsLexington
9Corners4
Colorado SpringsLexington
68Dangerous attacks39
Colorado SpringsLexington
10Fouls16
Colorado SpringsLexington
3Cards1
Colorado SpringsLexington

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Colorado SpringsLexington
1.75Goals scored / match1
Colorado SpringsLexington
2Goals conceded / match1
Colorado SpringsLexington
52%Average possession52%
Colorado SpringsLexington
3.75Shots on target / match3.75
Colorado SpringsLexington

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.25Shots per match13
Colorado SpringsLexington
3.75Shots on target3.75
Colorado SpringsLexington
12.3%Shot conversion7.7%
Colorado SpringsLexington
52%Possession52%
Colorado SpringsLexington
1.53xG for1.36
Colorado SpringsLexington
1.26xG against1.25
Colorado SpringsLexington

Shooting quality

Colorado Springs: AttackingLexington: Balanced
Colorado SpringsLexington
Accuracy (shots on target)26%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.470.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Colorado Springs
DWLL
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%
Lexington
LDWL
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Colorado Springs is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - Colorado Springs · 1 goals / match - Lexington

Lexington is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Colorado Springs · 1 goals / match - Lexington

Colorado Springs scoring profile: strong

Colorado Springs scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

Lexington scoring profile: very strong

Lexington scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

7Goals scored (season)4
Colorado SpringsLexington
8Goals conceded (season)4
Colorado SpringsLexington
3.75Average goals in match2
Colorado SpringsLexington
7Goals scored (last 5)4
Colorado SpringsLexington
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Colorado SpringsLexington

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal50%
Colorado SpringsLexington
75%2 goals25%
Colorado SpringsLexington
25%3 goals25%
Colorado SpringsLexington
0%4 goals0%
Colorado SpringsLexington

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Colorado SpringsLexington
75%2 goals50%
Colorado SpringsLexington
25%3 goals0%
Colorado SpringsLexington
0%4 goals0%
Colorado SpringsLexington

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
Colorado SpringsLexington
25%BTTS in both halves0%
Colorado SpringsLexington
25%Scored in both halves0%
Colorado SpringsLexington

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Colorado SpringsLexington
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Colorado SpringsLexington
75%BTTS - last 525%
Colorado SpringsLexington

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

25%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Colorado SpringsLexington
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Colorado SpringsLexington
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Colorado SpringsLexington

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Colorado SpringsLexington
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Colorado SpringsLexington
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Colorado SpringsLexington

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lexington is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Colorado Springs · 1.25 pts / match - Lexington

Colorado Springs - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Lexington - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.25
Colorado SpringsLexington
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Colorado SpringsLexington
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Colorado SpringsLexington
0.5Average goals (1st half)0.5
Colorado SpringsLexington
75%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Colorado SpringsLexington
75%No goal before half-time75%
Colorado SpringsLexington

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1
Colorado SpringsLexington
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Colorado SpringsLexington
1.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Colorado SpringsLexington
3.25Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Colorado SpringsLexington
0%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Colorado SpringsLexington
25%No goal after half-time75%
Colorado SpringsLexington

Colorado Springs - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.5

Concedes 1.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lexington - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Colorado Springs - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.31.5
Goals conceded / match0.31.8
Average goals in match0.53.3
1 goal25%100%
2 goals25%75%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet75%0%
No goal75%25%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
Lexington - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.251.00
Goals scored / match0.30.8
Goals conceded / match0.30.8
Average goals in match0.51.5
1 goal50%75%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet75%50%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 25% leading - 50% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Colorado Springs
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Lexington
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Colorado Springs

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
179%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Lexington

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Colorado SpringsLigaLexington
Average goals in match 3.752.59 2.00
Both teams scored 75%53% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%53% 50%
Clean sheets 0%30% 50%
Goal before half-time 25%57% 50%
Goal after half-time 100%86% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Colorado SpringsYellow cardKhori Bennett
  2. LexingtonGoalXavier ZengueAssist: Marcus Epps
  3. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Kendall BurksOff: Javain Okemio Brown
  4. Colorado SpringsYellow cardPatrick Julien Burner
  5. LexingtonYellow cardPhillip Goodrum
  6. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Elio Nicolas FirminoOff: Alfredo Midence Alvarado
  7. Colorado SpringsSubstitutionOn: Aidan RochaOff: Garven-Michee Metusala
  8. Colorado SpringsGoalKhori Bennett
  9. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Michael AdedokunOff: Marcus Epps
  10. Colorado SpringsYellow cardFrank Daroma

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Colorado Springs 1 - 0 - 1 Lexington. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
3 : 1
Lexington SC
Lexington SC
2 : 1
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC

FAQ

What was the result of Colorado Springs vs Lexington?

The USL Championship match finished Colorado Springs 1:1 Lexington. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Colorado Springs and Lexington?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Colorado Springs won 1, Lexington won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Springs vs Lexington?

Colorado Springs score 1.75 goals per game on average and Lexington 1.00. The USL Championship average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Colorado Springs's matches and 25% of Lexington's.

What form are Colorado Springs and Lexington in?

Over the last 5 games Colorado Springs have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Lexington 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Springs vs Lexington?

The statistical background for Colorado Springs vs Lexington — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.