United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 30 August 2026

Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics

Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Columbus Crew II played Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Columbus Crew II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Chicago Fire II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Columbus Crew II scores 1.78 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Chicago Fire II scores 2.00 and concedes 1.58. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Columbus Crew II 74%, Chicago Fire II 71%. Over 2.5: Columbus Crew II 70%, Chicago Fire II 83%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire II has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.60. Columbus Crew II: 13.1 shots per match, Chicago Fire II: 13.3.

Match halves

Columbus Crew II: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.04. Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.96.

Goals by minute

Columbus Crew II: 76-90+ (10 goals). Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Columbus Crew II have a clear home advantage: they win 73% of their home matches and lose just 9%, while Chicago Fire II win only 17% of their away games and lose 50%. The hosts average 2.18 goals per match at home, significantly more than the 1.50 goals scored by the visitors away from home, while their shot conversion rate stands at 17% compared with 12%. Chicago’s defence concedes an average of 1.75 goals away from home and keeps a clean sheet in just 8% of matches, which should allow Columbus to make the most of their average of 5.27 shots on target per game. However, the visitors are in better recent form, having won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 15 goals in that span, so their scoring cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, the hosts’ home xG stands at 1.63 compared with Chicago’s 1.49 away from home, while Columbus’ considerably more consistent home results point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Chicago Fire II have recorded BTTS in 83% of their league matches, significantly above Columbus Crew II’s 58% and the league average of 62%. The hosts score an average of 2.50 goals per match, while the visitors average 1.50, with Chicago conceding as many as 1.75 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in only 8% of matches. The visitors’ attacking form further supports the Goal/Goal scenario: over their last five matches, they have scored an average of 3.0 goals with an xG of 2.16, while Columbus conceded 1.4 goals during this period. Both teams have also recorded at least three goals in 83% of their matches, and the combination of Columbus’s attacking efficiency and Chicago’s vulnerable defence increases the likelihood of both sides finding the net. BTTS - Yes remains the stronger scenario, although Columbus’s 33% clean-sheet rate limits confidence in the selection.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have surpassed the 1.5-goal line in 92% of their matches this season, which is an exceptionally strong argument for an open game. Columbus average 2.50 goals per match, while Chicago concede 1.75, and the hosts create chances worth an average of 1.82 xG. Chicago have scored as many as 3.0 goals per match in their last five appearances and generated 2.16 xG, while Columbus conceded 1.4 goals over the same period. Furthermore, both teams have recorded at least three goals in 83% of their matches this season, although the Over 1.5 goals line remains a clearly safer choice than higher thresholds.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Columbus Crew II has a clearly superior season-long record: they win 67% of their matches and score an average of 2.50 goals, while Chicago Fire II win only 17% of their games and concede an average of 1.75 goals. The hosts often start matches strongly, having led at the break in 7 of 12 games, or 58%, while their average of 1.33 first-half goals is higher than Chicago’s 0.75. Columbus’s attacking quality is also evident: they create an average of 1.82 xG and record 5.17 shots on target per match, compared with the visitors’ 1.49 xG and 4.75 shots on target. Chicago have been effective recently, averaging 3.0 goals across their last five appearances, but they have also conceded as many as 1.4 goals per game in the first halves of those matches. The most likely HT/FT scenario is therefore a Columbus lead at the break followed by maintaining that advantage until the final whistle, although the visitors’ strong current attacking form reduces confidence in this outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
-1Shots-1
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
-1Shots on target-1
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
0xG0
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
-1Corners-1
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
0Dangerous attacks0
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
-1Fouls-1
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
-1Cards-1
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
1.78Goals scored / match2
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
1.57Goals conceded / match1.58
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
54%Average possession52%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
5.35Shots on target / match4.96
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.09Shots per match13.29
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
5.35Shots on target4.96
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
13.6%Shot conversion15%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
54%Possession52%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
1.6xG for1.64
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
1.69xG against1.49
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

Shooting quality

Columbus Crew II: Efficient finishingChicago Fire II: Efficient finishing
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
Accuracy (shots on target)41%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire II is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Columbus Crew II · 1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire II

Columbus Crew II
WLLWL
Season result split
48% W22% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-7
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Chicago Fire II
WLWLW
Season result split
42% W21% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-9
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.16Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire II is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

1.78 goals / match - Columbus Crew II · 2 goals / match - Chicago Fire II

Columbus Crew II scoring profile: very strong

Columbus Crew II scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Columbus Crew II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

41Goals scored (season)48
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
36Goals conceded (season)38
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
3.35Average goals in match3.58
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
8Goals scored (last 5)15
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal83%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
61%2 goals58%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
26%3 goals29%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
4%4 goals13%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal79%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
57%2 goals54%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
9%3 goals21%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
9%4 goals4%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

74%
Columbus Crew II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 23 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

39%BTTS at half-time29%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
9%BTTS in both halves17%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
35%Scored in both halves46%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

BTTS and goal count

70%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
60%BTTS - last 580%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
52%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / match - Columbus Crew II · 1.54 pts / match - Chicago Fire II

Columbus Crew II - half-time state
30% leading48% draw22% trailing
Chicago Fire II - half-time state
42% leading29% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per match (1st half)1.54
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
0.74Goals scored (1st half)1.04
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
1.61Average goals (1st half)1.75
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
43%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
43%No goal before half-time38%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.7Points per match (2nd half)1.46
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
1.04Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.83
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
43%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II
35%No goal after half-time33%
Columbus Crew IIChicago Fire II

Columbus Crew II - second-half results

48% W26% R26% P
32
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

38% W33% R29% P
37
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Columbus Crew II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chicago Fire II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.40
Goals scored / match1.21.8
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.62.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-1+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Columbus Crew II
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
8
16-30
9
8
31-45
8
4
46-60
6
5
61-75
10
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
6
3
16-30
13
9
31-45
12
8
46-60
3
4
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
73%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+73%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Columbus Crew II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Columbus Crew IILigaChicago Fire II
Average goals in match 3.353.30 3.58
Both teams scored 74%62% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 70%66% 83%
Clean sheets 17%21% 21%
Goal before half-time 74%76% 83%
Goal after half-time 87%84% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.89
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Columbus Crew II 0 - 1 - 2 Chicago Fire II. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Columbus Crew II
3 : 3
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
6 : 1
Columbus Crew II
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
5 : 0
Columbus Crew II

FAQ

What was the result of Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Columbus Crew II 4:0 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Columbus Crew II and Chicago Fire II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Columbus Crew II won 0, Chicago Fire II won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II?

Columbus Crew II score 1.78 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 2.00. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Columbus Crew II's matches and 71% of Chicago Fire II's.

What form are Columbus Crew II and Chicago Fire II in?

Over the last 5 games Columbus Crew II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II?

The statistical background for Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.