Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics
Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Columbus Crew II played Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Columbus Crew II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Chicago Fire II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Columbus Crew II scores 1.78 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Chicago Fire II scores 2.00 and concedes 1.58. League average: 3.30 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Columbus Crew II 74%, Chicago Fire II 71%. Over 2.5: Columbus Crew II 70%, Chicago Fire II 83%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Chicago Fire II has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.60. Columbus Crew II: 13.1 shots per match, Chicago Fire II: 13.3.
Match halves
Columbus Crew II: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.04. Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.96.
Goals by minute
Columbus Crew II: 76-90+ (10 goals). Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Columbus Crew II have a clear home advantage: they win 73% of their home matches and lose just 9%, while Chicago Fire II win only 17% of their away games and lose 50%. The hosts average 2.18 goals per match at home, significantly more than the 1.50 goals scored by the visitors away from home, while their shot conversion rate stands at 17% compared with 12%. Chicago’s defence concedes an average of 1.75 goals away from home and keeps a clean sheet in just 8% of matches, which should allow Columbus to make the most of their average of 5.27 shots on target per game. However, the visitors are in better recent form, having won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 15 goals in that span, so their scoring cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, the hosts’ home xG stands at 1.63 compared with Chicago’s 1.49 away from home, while Columbus’ considerably more consistent home results point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Chicago Fire II have recorded BTTS in 83% of their league matches, significantly above Columbus Crew II’s 58% and the league average of 62%. The hosts score an average of 2.50 goals per match, while the visitors average 1.50, with Chicago conceding as many as 1.75 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in only 8% of matches. The visitors’ attacking form further supports the Goal/Goal scenario: over their last five matches, they have scored an average of 3.0 goals with an xG of 2.16, while Columbus conceded 1.4 goals during this period. Both teams have also recorded at least three goals in 83% of their matches, and the combination of Columbus’s attacking efficiency and Chicago’s vulnerable defence increases the likelihood of both sides finding the net. BTTS - Yes remains the stronger scenario, although Columbus’s 33% clean-sheet rate limits confidence in the selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have surpassed the 1.5-goal line in 92% of their matches this season, which is an exceptionally strong argument for an open game. Columbus average 2.50 goals per match, while Chicago concede 1.75, and the hosts create chances worth an average of 1.82 xG. Chicago have scored as many as 3.0 goals per match in their last five appearances and generated 2.16 xG, while Columbus conceded 1.4 goals over the same period. Furthermore, both teams have recorded at least three goals in 83% of their matches this season, although the Over 1.5 goals line remains a clearly safer choice than higher thresholds.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Columbus Crew II has a clearly superior season-long record: they win 67% of their matches and score an average of 2.50 goals, while Chicago Fire II win only 17% of their games and concede an average of 1.75 goals. The hosts often start matches strongly, having led at the break in 7 of 12 games, or 58%, while their average of 1.33 first-half goals is higher than Chicago’s 0.75. Columbus’s attacking quality is also evident: they create an average of 1.82 xG and record 5.17 shots on target per match, compared with the visitors’ 1.49 xG and 4.75 shots on target. Chicago have been effective recently, averaging 3.0 goals across their last five appearances, but they have also conceded as many as 1.4 goals per game in the first halves of those matches. The most likely HT/FT scenario is therefore a Columbus lead at the break followed by maintaining that advantage until the final whistle, although the visitors’ strong current attacking form reduces confidence in this outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Columbus Crew II | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chicago Fire II is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Columbus Crew II · 1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire II is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.78 goals / match - Columbus Crew II · 2 goals / match - Chicago Fire II
Columbus Crew II scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).
Chicago Fire II scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Columbus Crew II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Columbus Crew II
Over / Under - Chicago Fire II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire II is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.39 pts / match - Columbus Crew II · 1.54 pts / match - Chicago Fire II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Columbus Crew II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Columbus Crew II
Chicago Fire II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Columbus Crew II | Liga | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.35 | 3.30 | ▲ 3.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 62% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 66% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 21% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 74% | 76% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 84% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Columbus Crew II 0 - 1 - 2 Chicago Fire II. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Columbus Crew II 4:0 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Columbus Crew II and Chicago Fire II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Columbus Crew II won 0, Chicago Fire II won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II?
Columbus Crew II score 1.78 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 2.00. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Columbus Crew II's matches and 71% of Chicago Fire II's.
What form are Columbus Crew II and Chicago Fire II in?
Over the last 5 games Columbus Crew II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II?
The statistical background for Columbus Crew II vs Chicago Fire II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


