Columbus Crew II vs Connecticut United: match statistics
Columbus Crew II vs Connecticut United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Columbus Crew II played Connecticut United in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 8 June 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Columbus Crew II: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Connecticut United: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Columbus Crew II scores 1.77 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. Connecticut United scores 1.36 and concedes 1.82. League average: 3.20 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Columbus Crew II 77%, Connecticut United 73%. Over 2.5: Columbus Crew II 69%, Connecticut United 73%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Connecticut United has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.56. Columbus Crew II: 13.2 shots per match, Connecticut United: 13.7.
Match halves
Columbus Crew II: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.08. Connecticut United: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Columbus Crew II: 31-45+ (6 goals). Connecticut United: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). Columbus Crew II win 67% of home matches and remain unbeaten at their stadium, averaging 2.00 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 10 goals and average 1.6 points per game (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss), while Connecticut United have 6 goals and 1.0 point per game in their last five (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses). Despite similar average xG (1.76 for Columbus vs 1.83 for Connecticut), the visitors concede 1.86 goals on the road versus an xG against of 1.25, whereas the home side concedes only 1.00 and keep clean sheets in 33% of matches, indicating a defensive edge for Columbus. The visitors register slightly more on-target shots away (6.57 vs 5.67), but with the same shot conversion (13%) this does not offset their inferior points average and stability, so I assess the probabilities at 65% for Columbus, 20% for a draw and 15% for Connecticut.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes, because Connecticut United have BTTS in 86% of their matches this season and Columbus Crew II in 50% (league average 61%), providing a strong signal from the visitors. In the last 5 games Columbus recorded BTTS in 100% and scored on average 2.0 goals while conceding 1.6, whereas Connecticut have BTTS in 60% of their last 5 with averages of 1.2 scored and 1.4 conceded, indicating goal exchange. Both teams generate significant xG: Columbus xG_for 1.56 vs xG_against 1.04, Connecticut xG_for 1.83 vs xG_against 1.25, so expected chances from both sides favor goals. Against this is the low seasonal home scoring average of 0.5 and Columbus’s low conversion 4% vs Connecticut 13%, but Columbus have only 25% clean sheets and Connecticut 0% clean sheets, so I ultimately back Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Projection based on xG and form: Columbus has xG_for 1.56 versus 1.25 xG conceded by Connecticut, yielding expected home goals ≈1.41, while Connecticut has xG_for 1.83 versus 1.04 xG conceded by Columbus, yielding expected away goals ≈1.43 for a total of about 2.84 goals. Seasonal indicators corroborate this picture – over 1.5 occurred in 75% of Columbus matches and 100% of Connecticut matches, and the league averages 3.21 goals per match; in the last 5 games Columbus averaged 2.0 goals (10 goals). Columbus shows a large gap between xG_for 1.56 and season goals average 0.5 and very low conversion 4.0% despite 5.0 shots on target and 12.5 shots per match, but the last 5 matches suggest improved finishing. Connecticut averages 14.4 attempts and 6.57 shots on target with a conversion rate of 13.0%, has a season goals average of 1.86 and 86% of matches with both teams scoring, which raises BTTS probability. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (I estimate 88% probability) with expected 2.84 goals; Over 2.5 also looks attractive (~70%), but due to the higher confidence I recommend playing Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis shows the home side average 0.5 goals per match while the away side average 1.86, with xG at 1.56 versus 1.83 in favor of the visitors. The hosts were level at the break in 75% of their games, whereas the visitors led at half-time in 43% of matches and scored 12 goals before the break compared to the hosts’ 5, indicating a high probability of a draw at half-time or a minimal lead for the Connecticut side. Additionally, the visitors display markedly better shot efficiency — 13% versus the hosts’ 4% — and average 2.0 second-half goals with 100% of their matches featuring a goal after the break, so I expect Connecticut to turn the result around after half-time. The hosts have 0% wins this season and only 0.25 points per home match, which significantly reduces their chances of a full-time victory. Therefore the most secure scenario is a draw at half-time and an away win at full-time, so I select HT/FT X/2 as the most probable outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Columbus Crew II | Connecticut United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Columbus Crew II is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Columbus Crew II · 1 pts / match - Connecticut United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Columbus Crew II is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.77 goals / match - Columbus Crew II · 1.36 goals / match - Connecticut United
Columbus Crew II is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.69 goals / match - Columbus Crew II · 1.82 goals / match - Connecticut United
Columbus Crew II scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Connecticut United keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).
Connecticut United scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Columbus Crew II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Columbus Crew II
Over / Under - Connecticut United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Columbus Crew II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Connecticut United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Columbus Crew II
Connecticut United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Columbus Crew II | Liga | Connecticut United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.46 | 3.20 | • 3.18 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 77% | 61% | ▲ 73% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 65% | ▲ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 22% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 75% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 83% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Columbus Crew II 1 - 0 - 0 Connecticut United. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Columbus Crew II vs Connecticut United?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Columbus Crew II 2:1 Connecticut United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Columbus Crew II vs Connecticut United?
Columbus Crew II score 1.77 goals per game on average and Connecticut United 1.36. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Columbus Crew II's matches and 73% of Connecticut United's.
What form are Columbus Crew II and Connecticut United in?
Over the last 5 games Columbus Crew II have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Connecticut United 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Columbus Crew II vs Connecticut United?
The statistical background for Columbus Crew II vs Connecticut United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


