United States - MLSData current as of 06 September 2026

Columbus Crew vs Chicago Fire: match statistics

Columbus Crew crest
Columbus Crew
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire
155%(1.67)
X25%(3.80)
220%(3.70)

Columbus Crew appears to be the favorite in this match despite their poorer recent form over the last five games (0.8 PPG). Chicago Fire boasts better overall form (1.4 PPG) and a more favorable seasonal goal difference (4:2 vs 4:5); however, their away statistics are alarming, with a 100% loss record in away fixtures. Chicago Fire loses every away match, conceding an average of 2 goals per game and failing to keep a single clean sheet. Columbus Crew, playing at home, should capitalize on the home-field advantage, especially given the visitors' very poor shot conversion rate (17%) and negative away xG balance (0.91 xG For vs 1.07 xG Against). The hosts' advantage is moderate due to their inconsistent form, which leaves room for a draw or an upset by the visitors.

Columbus Crew vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Columbus Crew played Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The match was played on 8 March 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Columbus Crew: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match. Chicago Fire: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Columbus Crew scores 2.00 and concedes 2.50 goals per match. Chicago Fire scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.81 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Columbus Crew 100%, Chicago Fire 50%. Over 2.5: Columbus Crew 100%, Chicago Fire 100%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Columbus Crew has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.50. Columbus Crew: 12.5 shots per match, Chicago Fire: 11.5.

Match halves

Columbus Crew: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Chicago Fire: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Columbus Crew: 31-45+ (2 goals). Chicago Fire: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Columbus Crew appears to be the favorite in this match despite their poorer recent form over the last five games (0.8 PPG). Chicago Fire boasts better overall form (1.4 PPG) and a more favorable seasonal goal difference (4:2 vs 4:5); however, their away statistics are alarming, with a 100% loss record in away fixtures. Chicago Fire loses every away match, conceding an average of 2 goals per game and failing to keep a single clean sheet. Columbus Crew, playing at home, should capitalize on the home-field advantage, especially given the visitors' very poor shot conversion rate (17%) and negative away xG balance (0.91 xG For vs 1.07 xG Against). The hosts' advantage is moderate due to their inconsistent form, which leaves room for a draw or an upset by the visitors.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
13Shots8
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
5Shots on target3
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
1.54xG1.08
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
7Corners3
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
50Dangerous attacks50
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
11Fouls10
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
2Cards4
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Columbus CrewChicago Fire
2Goals scored / match2
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
2.5Goals conceded / match1
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
56%Average possession51%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
4.5Shots on target / match7
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match11.5
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
4.5Shots on target7
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
16%Shot conversion17.4%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
56%Possession51%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
1.63xG for1.5
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
1.23xG against0.84
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

Shooting quality

Columbus Crew: Efficient finishingChicago Fire: Efficient finishing
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
Accuracy (shots on target)36%61%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.5 pts / match - Columbus Crew · 1.5 pts / match - Chicago Fire

Columbus Crew
LD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Chicago Fire
LW
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 150% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.5 goals / match - Columbus Crew · 1 goals / match - Chicago Fire

Columbus Crew scoring profile: very strong

Columbus Crew scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Columbus Crew keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

4Goals scored (season)4
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
5Goals conceded (season)2
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
4.5Average goals in match3
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
100%2 goals50%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
0%3 goals50%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
0%4 goals0%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
100%2 goals50%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
50%3 goals0%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
0%4 goals0%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
50%Scored in both halves50%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
100%BTTS - last 550%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Columbus Crew · 3 pts / match - Chicago Fire

Columbus Crew - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Chicago Fire - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)3
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
1.5Goals scored (1st half)1
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
2.5Average goals (1st half)1
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
0%No goal before half-time0%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
2Average goals (2nd half)2
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
0%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire
50%No goal after half-time50%
Columbus CrewChicago Fire

Columbus Crew - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Columbus Crew - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.00
Goals scored / match1.50.5
Goals conceded / match1.01.5
Average goals in match2.52.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals50%50%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.50
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Columbus Crew
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
133%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Columbus Crew

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.90
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
321%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
256%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Columbus CrewLigaChicago Fire
Average goals in match 4.502.81 3.00
Both teams scored 100%41% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%56% 100%
Clean sheets 0%31% 50%
Goal before half-time 100%75% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%88% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.81
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
2.03
Home goals / match
0.78
Away goals / match
+160%
Home attack advantage
+62%
Home defence advantage
+53%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Columbus CrewYellow cardMalte Amundsen
  2. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Dylan BorsoOff: Leonardo José Caetano Barroso
  3. Chicago FireYellow cardJoel Waterman
  4. Columbus CrewSubstitutionOn: Hugo PicardOff: Amar Sejdic
  5. Chicago FireYellow cardPhilip Aksel Frigast Zinckernagel
  6. Chicago FireYellow cardAnton Jönsson Salétros
  7. Columbus CrewYellow cardSean Zawadzki
  8. Chicago FireYellow cardJonathan Bamba
  9. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Jason ShokalookOff: Philip Aksel Frigast Zinckernagel

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Tori PensoMatches officiated: 8
4.25Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins38%Draws25%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Columbus Crew vs Chicago Fire?

The MLS match finished Columbus Crew 0:0 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Columbus Crew vs Chicago Fire?

Columbus Crew score 2.00 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 2.00. The MLS average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Columbus Crew's matches and 50% of Chicago Fire's.

What form are Columbus Crew and Chicago Fire in?

Over the last 5 games Columbus Crew have a 0-1-1 record (0.50 points per game) and Chicago Fire 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Columbus Crew vs Chicago Fire?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Columbus Crew vs Chicago Fire: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.