Columbus Crew vs Orlando City: match statistics
Columbus Crew vs Orlando City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Columbus Crew played Orlando City in MLS (United States). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Columbus Crew: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Orlando City: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Columbus Crew scores 1.33 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Orlando City scores 0.83 and concedes 3.83. League average: 3.11 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Columbus Crew 67%, Orlando City 50%. Over 2.5: Columbus Crew 67%, Orlando City 100%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
Columbus Crew has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.19. Columbus Crew: 11.7 shots per match, Orlando City: 11.2.
Match halves
Columbus Crew: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Orlando City: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.17.
Goals by minute
Columbus Crew: 0-15 (2 goals). Orlando City: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). Columbus concedes on average 0.5 goals per home match and records a 50% clean sheet rate, whereas Orlando concedes a staggering 5.33 goals per away match and has registered 0 clean sheets (0%). In attack Columbus averages 10.5 shots and 3.5 shots on target per home match, with an average xG of 1.24 compared to Orlando’s 0.93 on the road; the hosts have scored 8 goals this season versus the visitors’ 5. Form supports the edge — Columbus in the last 5 matches is 1-2-2 (1.0 point per game), while Orlando is 1-0-4 (0.6 points per game) and has lost all 5 away fixtures. Considering the gulf in average goals conceded (0.5 vs 5.33), the higher xG generated by opponents against Orlando (1.81 vs 0.99 against Columbus), and Columbus’s advantage in shots and possession (10.5 and 54% vs 8.33 and 42%), the hosts’ probability of winning is substantially higher.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I forecast BTTS - Yes because Columbus averages 1.67 goals per match while Orlando concedes as many as 5.33 goals per match this season, strongly suggesting the hosts should find the net. Orlando have conceded 21 goals in their last 5 matches (4.2 per game) and scored 4 goals (0.8 per game), so despite low productivity the visitors still have a real chance to score against a Columbus defense that conceded 6 goals in the same period (1.2 per game). Columbus generates on average 14 shots and 5.67 shots on target with xG 1.45, whereas Orlando has 8.33 shots, 2.67 on target and xG 0.93, which shows the hosts’ advantage in chance creation but also opportunities for the opponent. Season-long indicators are partially contradictory (Columbus season BTTS 100% vs Orlando 0%), yet in the shorter term BTTS occurred in 60% of Columbus matches and 40% of Orlando matches, and the league BTTS rate is 53%, all of which support a both teams to score scenario. Additionally both teams have 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, and Orlando’s high number of goals conceded (23 on the season) makes BTTS - Yes the strongest scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Columbus averages 1.67 goals per game with xG 1.45, while conceding 2.33 goals per game; Orlando has xG 0.93, has scored 5 and conceded 23 this season, and in the last 5 matches the visitors conceded 21 goals (4.2 per game). Combining the home xG (1.45) with the visitors’ xG against (1.81) yields expected goals for Columbus ≈1.63, and combining the visitors’ xG (0.93) with the home xG against (2.08) yields expected goals for Orlando ≈1.50, total expected goals 3.13. With that total, a Poisson distribution gives probability for Over 1.5 (at least 2 goals) ≈82%, Over 2.5 ≈61% and Over 3.5 ≈38%. Additionally both teams have a season rate of matches Over 2.5 goals at 100%, and in the last 5 games Columbus recorded Over 2.5 in 60% of matches while Orlando in 100%, which reinforces the expectation of a higher-scoring game. Therefore the strongest and safest signal is the Over on the 1.5 line, while acknowledging that Over 2.5 also has solid support (~61%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The hosts led at the break in 67% of their home matches (2 of 3), scored 7 goals before halftime and average 1.33 first-half goals, which strongly indicates Columbus leading after 45 minutes. Columbus averages xG 1.45 versus Orlando’s 0.93 and takes 14.0 shots per match, of which 5.67 are on target on average; the visitors have 8.33 shots with 2.67 on target — a clear advantage in chance creation. Orlando have no wins (0%) and lose 100% of matches, conceding an average of 5.33 goals per game, so the hosts maintaining their lead and winning is highly likely. On the other hand, Columbus concedes 2.33 goals on average and has xG against of 2.08, which presents a realistic risk of surrendering the lead after halftime; therefore I allow alternatives 1/X and X/1 as possible scenarios. Summing these figures — 67% halftime leads, xG advantage 1.45–0.93 and shot ratio 14.0–8.33 — I select 1/1 as the strongest and most probable outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Columbus Crew | Orlando City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Columbus Crew is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Columbus Crew · 0.6 pts / match - Orlando City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Columbus Crew is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Columbus Crew · 0.83 goals / match - Orlando City
Columbus Crew is 155% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Columbus Crew · 3.83 goals / match - Orlando City
Columbus Crew scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).
Orlando City scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Columbus Crew keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Columbus Crew
Over / Under - Orlando City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Columbus Crew is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / match - Columbus Crew · 1 pts / match - Orlando City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Columbus Crew - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Orlando City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -10 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Columbus Crew
Orlando City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Columbus Crew | Liga | Orlando City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.83 | 3.11 | ▲ 4.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 25% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 81% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Columbus Crew vs Orlando City?
The MLS match finished Columbus Crew 1:1 Orlando City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Columbus Crew vs Orlando City?
Columbus Crew score 1.33 goals per game on average and Orlando City 0.83. The MLS average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Columbus Crew's matches and 50% of Orlando City's.
What form are Columbus Crew and Orlando City in?
Over the last 5 games Columbus Crew have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Orlando City 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Columbus Crew vs Orlando City?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


