Concordia Chiajna vs ASU Poli Timişoara: match statistics
Concordia Chiajna vs ASU Poli Timişoara: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Concordia Chiajna played ASU Poli Timişoara in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Stadionul Concordia. Final score: 1:5.
Current form
Concordia Chiajna: 3-0-0, 3.00 points/match. ASU Poli Timişoara: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match.
Goal statistics
Concordia Chiajna scores 2.33 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. ASU Poli Timişoara scores 1.00 and concedes 0.33. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Concordia Chiajna 67%, ASU Poli Timişoara 33%. Over 2.5: Concordia Chiajna 67%, ASU Poli Timişoara 0%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
ASU Poli Timişoara has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.46. Concordia Chiajna: 11.7 shots per match, ASU Poli Timişoara: 15.3.
Match halves
Concordia Chiajna: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.33. ASU Poli Timişoara: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Concordia Chiajna: 76-90+ (3 goals). ASU Poli Timişoara: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga II: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Concordia Chiajna are unbeaten this season, winning all 3 of their matches, and have a perfect home record, averaging 2 goals scored and conceding none. The hosts are also in excellent form: they have scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches, winning 4 and drawing once. ASU Poli Timişoara also have a record of 4 wins and 1 draw in their last five appearances, while their defence has conceded just 1 goal during this period, meaning the risk of a tightly contested match remains high. The visitors create slightly more high-quality chances away from home, with an average xG of 1.83 compared with Concordia’s 1.74, but convert them into just 1 goal per match at a 6% conversion rate. Concordia’s advantage comes from their significantly better chance conversion at home, where they average 7 shots on target and keep clean sheets, making a narrow home win slightly more likely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for BTTS - No is driven primarily by very solid defensive performances: Concordia have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches so far, while ASU Poli Timişoara have conceded an average of just 0.2 goals across their last five games. The visitors have recorded BTTS in only 20% of their matches during this period, compared with 80% for the hosts, suggesting that the main risk to the pick is Concordia’s attacking efficiency rather than a regular end-to-end exchange of goals. ASU average 1.4 goals in their last five matches, but they will face a team that has not conceded at home this season. Although the visitors’ attack generates a high xG of 2.02, they will be up against a home defence with an xGA of 1.58. Therefore, the most likely scenario remains one in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is the low four-goal line: based on the current season data, neither team has exceeded the 2.5-goal threshold even once, while the league average stands at 2.55. However, Concordia are in excellent attacking form, scoring 13 goals in their last five matches, or 2.6 per game, which means the lower Under 2.5 goals option does not provide a sufficient margin. Over the same period, ASU Poli Timişoara conceded just 1 goal in 5 matches, an average of 0.2, which should significantly limit the hosts’ attacking potential. On the other hand, the hosts have conceded an average of 1.0 goal in their last five appearances, while the visitors’ xG stands at 2.02, making at least two goals in the match a realistic scenario. The 2.40-goal projection supports the Under 3.5 goals pick, as it requires avoiding only a very open game with four goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Concordia win at full-time, as ASU Poli have been level at the break in 80% of their last five matches and failed to score before half-time in as many as 80% of those games. Concordia also tend to start cautiously: a half-time draw occurred in 60% of their last five appearances, although the hosts averaged 0.8 goals before the break compared with 0.2 for their opponents. After the interval, Concordia’s advantage increases, having averaged 1.8 goals in the second half and conceded just 0.4 over their last five matches, while Poli scored 1.2 goals during that period. The hosts also have a clearly superior chance-creation profile at home: their average xG stands at 2.02 compared with the visitors’ 1.83, while they also record 7.5 shots on target per match versus 4.0 for their opponents. Their home-season record—100% wins and not a single goal conceded—further strengthens the forecast of a Concordia turnaround in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Concordia Chiajna | ASU Poli Timişoara | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.16 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Concordia Chiajna is 29% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Concordia Chiajna · 2.33 pts / match - ASU Poli Timişoara
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Concordia Chiajna is 133% better for: goals scored per match.
2.33 goals / match - Concordia Chiajna · 1 goals / match - ASU Poli Timişoara
ASU Poli Timişoara is 103% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.67 goals / match - Concordia Chiajna · 0.33 goals / match - ASU Poli Timişoara
Concordia Chiajna scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while ASU Poli Timişoara keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).
ASU Poli Timişoara scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Concordia Chiajna
Over / Under - ASU Poli Timişoara
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Concordia Chiajna - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
ASU Poli Timişoara - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.67 | 2.33 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.67 | 1.67 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals in match | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 67% |
| No goal | 67% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Concordia Chiajna
ASU Poli Timişoara
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Concordia Chiajna | Liga | ASU Poli Timişoara | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.56 | ▼ 1.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 50% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 24% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 82% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Concordia Chiajna vs ASU Poli Timişoara?
The Liga II match finished Concordia Chiajna 1:5 ASU Poli Timişoara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Concordia Chiajna vs ASU Poli Timişoara?
Concordia Chiajna score 2.33 goals per game on average and ASU Poli Timişoara 1.00. The Liga II average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Concordia Chiajna's matches and 33% of ASU Poli Timişoara's.
What form are Concordia Chiajna and ASU Poli Timişoara in?
Over the last 5 games Concordia Chiajna have a 3-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and ASU Poli Timişoara 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Concordia Chiajna vs ASU Poli Timişoara?
The statistical background for Concordia Chiajna vs ASU Poli Timişoara — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.