Romania - Liga IIData current as of 23 July 2026

Concordia Chiajna vs Tunari: match statistics

Concordia Chiajna crest
Concordia Chiajna
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Tunari crest
Tunari

Concordia Chiajna vs Tunari: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Concordia Chiajna play Tunari in Liga II (Romania). The match date is 10 April 2026 at 10:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Concordia Chiajna: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Tunari: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Concordia Chiajna scores 1.39 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Tunari scores 1.00 and concedes 1.64. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Concordia Chiajna 43%, Tunari 64%. Over 2.5: Concordia Chiajna 36%, Tunari 50%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Concordia Chiajna has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.22. Concordia Chiajna: 12.5 shots per match, Tunari: 9.3.

Match halves

Concordia Chiajna: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.89. Tunari: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Concordia Chiajna: 61-75 (14 goals). Tunari: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga II: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Concordia Chiajna holds a clear statistical advantage: at home they score an average of 2.00 goals per match and concede only 0.83, while Tunari score 0.82 and concede 1.64 on the road. The hosts also generate significantly more chances — on average 5.42 shots on target and 13.33 attempts per home match versus 2.55 shots on target and 8.18 attempts for the visitors — translating into a higher xG of 1.78 for Concordia versus 1.05 for Tunari. The gap in efficiency and defence is sizable: Concordia have clean sheets in 50% of matches and are shut out in only 17%, whereas Tunari record 9% clean sheets and fail to score in 45% of games. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 7 goals and are averaging 1.8 points per match, while Tunari have 5 goals and 1.0 point per match, which confirms Concordia’s form advantage. Considering the home side’s 1st place versus the visitors’ 8th and Concordia’s +14 goal difference versus Tunari’s -9, I expect a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
22Shots7
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
9Shots on target1
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
2.66xG0.95
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
13Corners3
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
89Dangerous attacks59
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
10Fouls7
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
1Cards4
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Concordia ChiajnaTunari
1.39Goals scored / match1
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
1.04Goals conceded / match1.64
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
54%Average possession48%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
4.46Shots on target / match3.14
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.54Shots per match9.25
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
4.46Shots on target3.14
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
11.1%Shot conversion10.8%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
54%Possession48%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
1.61xG for1.22
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
1.41xG against1.88
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

Shooting quality

Concordia Chiajna: BalancedTunari: Balanced
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tunari is 38% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Concordia Chiajna · 2.2 pts / match - Tunari

Concordia Chiajna
DWWLD
Season result split
43% W18% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-11
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-2-4
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Tunari
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
21% W32% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-13
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-7-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Concordia Chiajna is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

1.39 goals / match - Concordia Chiajna · 1 goals / match - Tunari

Concordia Chiajna is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.04 goals / match - Concordia Chiajna · 1.64 goals / match - Tunari

Concordia Chiajna scoring profile: very strong

Concordia Chiajna scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while Tunari keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 28 matches).

Tunari scoring profile: strong

Tunari scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).

39Goals scored (season)28
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
29Goals conceded (season)46
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
2.43Average goals in match2.64
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal68%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
39%2 goals25%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
7%3 goals7%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
7%4 goals0%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal93%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
25%2 goals43%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
7%3 goals21%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
4%4 goals7%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
Concordia Chiajna - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 28 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time11%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
4%BTTS in both halves4%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
25%Scored in both halves11%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time96%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Concordia Chiajna is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Concordia Chiajna · 0.86 pts / match - Tunari

Concordia Chiajna - half-time state
25% leading36% draw39% trailing
Tunari - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)0.86
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.04
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
46%Clean sheet before half-time46%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
61%No goal before half-time75%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

After half-time (2nd half)

1.64Points per match (2nd half)1.25
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.61
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
68%Clean sheet after half-time36%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari
43%No goal after half-time46%
Concordia ChiajnaTunari

Concordia Chiajna - second-half results

43% W36% R21% P
31
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding172%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tunari - second-half results

36% W18% R46% P
24
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Concordia Chiajna - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tunari - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Concordia Chiajna
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
0
46-60
14
4
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Tunari
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
8
16-30
1
10
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
7
61-75
12
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Concordia Chiajna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Tunari

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

Concordia ChiajnaLigaTunari
Average goals in match 2.432.71 2.64
Both teams scored 43%49% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%49% 50%
Clean sheets 32%29% 7%
Goal before half-time 79%72% 68%
Goal after half-time 75%82% 96%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Concordia Chiajna 0 - 1 - 0 Tunari. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Tunari
1 : 1
Concordia Chiajna

FAQ

What was the result of Concordia Chiajna vs Tunari?

The Liga II match finished Concordia Chiajna 1:1 Tunari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Concordia Chiajna vs Tunari?

Concordia Chiajna score 1.39 goals per game on average and Tunari 1.00. The Liga II average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Concordia Chiajna's matches and 64% of Tunari's.

What form are Concordia Chiajna and Tunari in?

Over the last 5 games Concordia Chiajna have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Tunari 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Concordia Chiajna vs Tunari?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.