International - World CupMercedes-Benz StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Congo DR vs Uzbekistan: match statistics

Congo DR crest
Congo DR
3 : 1half-time 0:1
Uzbekistan crest
Uzbekistan

Congo DR vs Uzbekistan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Congo DR played Uzbekistan in World Cup (International). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Venue: Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Congo DR: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match. Uzbekistan: 0-0-2, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Congo DR scores 0.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Uzbekistan scores 0.50 and concedes 4.00. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Congo DR 50%, Uzbekistan 50%. Over 2.5: Congo DR 0%, Uzbekistan 100%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Uzbekistan has higher xG: 0.81 vs 0.77. Congo DR: 7.5 shots per match, Uzbekistan: 7.5.

Match halves

Congo DR: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Uzbekistan: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Congo DR: 31-45+ (1 goals). Uzbekistan: 46-60 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

World Cup: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Typ 1X2: 1. Congo DR has one point after a draw with Portugal and a minimal 0-1 defeat against Colombia, in which they kept the score for a long time thanks to the great play of Lionel Mpasi. Uzbekistan lost 1:3 to Colombia and 0:5 to Portugal, but in both meetings he was able to create single dangerous phases and had a goal canceled against Portugal. Both teams need a win, so the match should open up after a more cautious start. Congo DR has greater physical and defensive stability, but score pressure increases variance. Our independent forecast is 52% for Congo DR, 25% for draw and 23% for Uzbekistan. The most likely outcome profile is 2:1 or 1:1. The type does not result from bookmaker odds, but from the current disposition, quality of play, situation in the table and possible rotation. Status: SMALL BET

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Typ BTTS: yes. Congo DR has one point after a draw with Portugal and a narrow 0-1 defeat against Colombia, in which they kept the score for a long time thanks to the great play of Lionel Mpasi. Uzbekistan lost 1:3 to Colombia and 0:5 to Portugal, but in both meetings he was able to create single dangerous phases and had a goal canceled against Portugal. Both teams need a win, so the match should open up after a more cautious start. Congo DR has greater physical and defensive stability, but score pressure increases variance. Both teams must win. Congo DR has a stronger path to goal, but Uzbekistan has already shown that it can respond after switching to a quick attack. The model gives 55% on BTTS Yes and 45% on BTTS No, with xG 1.65 for Congo DR and 1.10 for Uzbekistan. Status: NOBET

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Typ: Over 2.5. Congo DR has one point after a draw with Portugal and a narrow 0-1 defeat against Colombia, in which they kept the score for a long time thanks to the great play of Lionel Mpasi. Uzbekistan lost 1:3 to Colombia and 0:5 to Portugal, but in both meetings he was able to create single dangerous phases and had a goal canceled against Portugal. Both teams need a win, so the match should open up after a more cautious start. Congo DR has greater physical and defensive stability, but score pressure increases variance. The model gives 52% for Over 2.5 and 48% for Under 2.5. Expected goals: Congo DR 1.65, Uzbekistan 1.10, total 2.75. Line 2.5 separates the basic 1:1 and 2:0 scenarios from the more open 2:1. Therefore, with a slight model advantage, the status remains cautious. The most likely outcome profile is 2:1 or 1:1. Status: NOBET

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Typ HT/FT: 1/1. Congo DR has one point after a draw with Portugal and a narrow 0-1 defeat against Colombia, in which they kept the score for a long time thanks to the great play of Lionel Mpasi. Uzbekistan lost 1:3 to Colombia and 0:5 to Portugal, but in both meetings he was able to create single dangerous phases and had a goal canceled against Portugal. Both teams need a win, so the match should open up after a more cautious start. Congo DR has greater physical and defensive stability, but score pressure increases variance. The highest rated paths were 1/1 31%, X/1 18% and X/X 15%. The distribution has been calibrated to our 1X2 52%-25%-23% and takes into account the expected contribution of the first half to the number of goals. HT/FT has a high variance, so even the highest path should not be treated as a certain result. Status: BET

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Congo DRUzbekistan
19Shots3
Congo DRUzbekistan
4Shots on target1
Congo DRUzbekistan
1.88xG0.6
Congo DRUzbekistan
2Corners4
Congo DRUzbekistan
54Dangerous attacks45
Congo DRUzbekistan
6Fouls16
Congo DRUzbekistan
3Cards2
Congo DRUzbekistan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.5Goals scored / match0.5
Congo DRUzbekistan
1Goals conceded / match4
Congo DRUzbekistan
31%Average possession37%
Congo DRUzbekistan
1.5Shots on target / match2
Congo DRUzbekistan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.5Shots per match7.5
Congo DRUzbekistan
1.5Shots on target2
Congo DRUzbekistan
6.7%Shot conversion6.7%
Congo DRUzbekistan
31%Possession37%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0.77xG for0.81
Congo DRUzbekistan
1.6xG against1.84
Congo DRUzbekistan

Shooting quality

Congo DR: BalancedUzbekistan: Balanced
Congo DRUzbekistan
Accuracy (shots on target)20%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Congo DR
DL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.77Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%
Uzbekistan
LL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 4.0xG: 0.81Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Congo DR is 300% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Congo DR · 4 goals / match - Uzbekistan

Congo DR scoring profile: very strong

Congo DR scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Uzbekistan keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Uzbekistan scoring profile: very strong

Uzbekistan scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Congo DR keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

1Goals scored (season)1
Congo DRUzbekistan
2Goals conceded (season)8
Congo DRUzbekistan
1.5Average goals in match4.5
Congo DRUzbekistan
1Goals scored (last 5)1
Congo DRUzbekistan
2Goals conceded (last 5)8
Congo DRUzbekistan

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%2 goals0%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%3 goals0%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%4 goals0%
Congo DRUzbekistan

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%2 goals100%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%3 goals100%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%4 goals50%
Congo DRUzbekistan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%Scored in both halves0%
Congo DRUzbekistan

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
Congo DRUzbekistan
50%BTTS - last 550%
Congo DRUzbekistan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Congo DRUzbekistan
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
Congo DRUzbekistan

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Congo DRUzbekistan
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Congo DRUzbekistan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Congo DR - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Uzbekistan - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0
Congo DRUzbekistan
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0
Congo DRUzbekistan
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)2
Congo DRUzbekistan
1Average goals (1st half)2
Congo DRUzbekistan
50%Clean sheet before half-time0%
Congo DRUzbekistan
50%No goal before half-time100%
Congo DRUzbekistan

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)0
Congo DRUzbekistan
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Congo DRUzbekistan
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)2
Congo DRUzbekistan
0.5Average goals (2nd half)2.5
Congo DRUzbekistan
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Congo DRUzbekistan
100%No goal after half-time50%
Congo DRUzbekistan

Congo DR - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Uzbekistan - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Congo DR - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.50
Goals scored / match0.50.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.00.5
1 goal50%50%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%100%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1
Uzbekistan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.000.00
Goals scored / match0.00.5
Goals conceded / match2.02.0
Average goals in match2.02.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%100%
3 goals50%50%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Congo DR
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Uzbekistan
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Congo DR

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.83
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
28%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Uzbekistan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-2.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-2.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
223%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (World Cup).

Teams vs league

Congo DRLigaUzbekistan
Average goals in match 1.502.96 4.50
Both teams scored 50%53% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%54% 100%
Clean sheets 0%28% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%71% 100%
Goal after half-time 50%78% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Congo DR vs Uzbekistan?

The World Cup match finished Congo DR 3:1 Uzbekistan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Congo DR vs Uzbekistan?

Congo DR score 0.50 goals per game on average and Uzbekistan 0.50. The World Cup average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Congo DR's matches and 50% of Uzbekistan's.

What form are Congo DR and Uzbekistan in?

Over the last 5 games Congo DR have a 0-1-1 record (0.50 points per game) and Uzbekistan 0-0-2 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Congo DR vs Uzbekistan?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Congo DR vs Uzbekistan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.