United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 07 September 2026

Connecticut United vs FC Cincinnati II: match statistics

Connecticut United vs FC Cincinnati II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Connecticut United played FC Cincinnati II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 18 June 2026. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Connecticut United: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. FC Cincinnati II: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Connecticut United scores 1.54 and concedes 1.85 goals per match. FC Cincinnati II scores 0.92 and concedes 1.77. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Connecticut United 77%, FC Cincinnati II 38%. Over 2.5: Connecticut United 77%, FC Cincinnati II 54%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Connecticut United has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.24. Connecticut United: 13.9 shots per match, FC Cincinnati II: 9.7.

Match halves

Connecticut United: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.77. FC Cincinnati II: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Connecticut United: 31-45+ (6 goals). FC Cincinnati II: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Connecticut United has the edge in chance creation and better recent form: in the last five matches they scored 10 goals (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses) and have home xG of 1.56, while FC Cincinnati II scored only 1 goal in their last five matches and have away xG of 1.21. The hosts average 12.5 shots and 5 on-target per home match versus the visitors’ 9.17 shots and 3.5 on-target away, translating into higher-quality chances for Connecticut despite both teams having an equally low conversion rate (4%). Defensively the visitors look weaker — FC Cincinnati II concedes 2.33 goals per away match and have conceded 11 goals in their last 5 games, whereas the hosts concede 1.75 goals in home matches. The risk for the hosts stems from having not yet won at home (0% wins) and failing to score in 50% of home appearances, but they have recently averaged 1.4 points per match in their last five games compared to 0 points for the visitors. Considering the hosts’ superior xG (1.56 vs 1.21), higher shot volume and the visitors’ dire run (0 points in the last 5 matches and 100% away defeats), I predict a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I recommend no BTTS: I assign 70% probability to 'No' and 30% to 'Yes', because FC Cincinnati II have very low scoring efficiency – averaging 0.33 goals per game for the season and only 0.2 in the last 5 matches (1 goal in 5), while Connecticut United record 1.43 goals for the season and 2.0 in the last 5 (10 goals). Despite similar xG (home xG 1.27 vs away 1.21), the conversion gap of 14% vs 4% clearly shows the visitors fail to convert created chances. Additionally, FC Cincinnati II concede on average 2.33 goals for the season and 2.2 in the last 5, which means the hosts are likely to score, but the hosts' own goals conceded (1.29 seasonally, 1.8 in the last 5) do not translate into the visitors' ability to respond. Season BTTS rates are 43% for Connecticut and 33% for Cincinnati, and the last 5 form balance (80% BTTS for the hosts vs 20% for the visitors) ultimately gives a stronger signal against Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is 1.27 (Connecticut United) + 1.21 (FC Cincinnati II) = 2.48, and in the last 5 matches Connecticut scores an average of 2.0 goals (10 goals) versus 0.2 goals (1 goal) for visitors, therefore I project 1.70 for the home side and 0.70 for the away side, total 2.40. Season Over 1.5 rates are 57% for Connecticut and 83% for Cincinnati II (average 70%), and the fact both teams have 100% of matches with over 0.5 goals and the league average is 3.23 goals/match reinforces a minimum-2-goal scenario. Connecticut has better shot conversion (14% on 10.14 shots) than the visitors (4% on 9.17), and FC Cincinnati II concedes an average of 2.33 goals per game, which supports the home advantage in creating and converting chances. The signal for Over 2.5 is weaker: season Over 2.5 is 57%/50% (average 53%) and the combined xG = 2.48 is very close to the 2.5 threshold, so I adopt a moderate probability for Over 2.5 (52%). As a result the strongest and best-justified selection is Over 1.5 (over) due to the combination of xG, home form and the difference in shooting efficiency.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I project a Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of draw at the break and Connecticut United winning (X/1) as the most probable. In the last five matches the home side were level at half-time in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and averaged 1.0 goals by the break, whereas FC Cincinnati II did not lead at half-time in any of those five games (0%) and averaged 0.0 first-half goals. In the second half the home team is markedly more dangerous — they score an average of 1.14 goals after the break versus 0.17 for the visitors, and the visitors concede an average of 1.33 second-half goals, which favors a turnaround from a half-time draw. Additionally, FC Cincinnati II have lost 100% of matches this season (losePercentage_away 100.0), the season average goals for the home side is 1.43 compared to 0.33 for the visitors, and the home team shows higher conversion (14% vs 4%) and more shots on target (4.0 vs 3.5). For these reasons the X/1 variant carries the highest weight in the forecast.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
19Shots11
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
11Shots on target3
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
2.39xG1.3
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
2Corners6
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
59Dangerous attacks55
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
10Fouls15
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
2Cards0
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.54Goals scored / match0.92
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.85Goals conceded / match1.77
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%Average possession43%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
6.08Shots on target / match3.77
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.92Shots per match9.69
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
6.08Shots on target3.77
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
11%Shot conversion9.5%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%Possession43%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.74xG for1.24
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.23xG against1.82
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Shooting quality

Connecticut United: BalancedFC Cincinnati II: Balanced
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
Accuracy (shots on target)44%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Connecticut United
LWDLW
Season result split
31% W15% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-7
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 at home
0-1-3
LLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
FC Cincinnati II
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W0% R77% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-10
0.69 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-6
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Connecticut United is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

1.54 goals / match - Connecticut United · 0.92 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II

FC Cincinnati II is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.85 goals / match - Connecticut United · 1.77 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II

Connecticut United scoring profile: very strong

Connecticut United scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while FC Cincinnati II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

FC Cincinnati II scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati II scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Connecticut United keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).

20Goals scored (season)12
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
24Goals conceded (season)23
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
3.38Average goals in match2.69
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
10Goals scored (last 5)1
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
9Goals conceded (last 5)11
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal54%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%2 goals15%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
23%3 goals8%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
8%4 goals8%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal85%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
69%2 goals54%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
15%3 goals31%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
8%4 goals8%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

77%
Connecticut United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 13 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time15%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
23%BTTS in both halves0%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
38%Scored in both halves8%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

BTTS and goal count

77%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
80%BTTS - last 520%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Connecticut United is 111% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - Connecticut United · 0.62 pts / match - FC Cincinnati II

Connecticut United - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing
FC Cincinnati II - half-time state
8% leading38% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)0.62
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
0.77Goals scored (1st half)0.23
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.54Average goals (1st half)1.08
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%Clean sheet before half-time31%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
38%No goal before half-time77%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.92
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.85Average goals (2nd half)1.62
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
15%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%No goal after half-time62%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Connecticut United - second-half results

23% W31% R46% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cincinnati II - second-half results

23% W23% R54% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding288%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Connecticut United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
FC Cincinnati II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-5-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Connecticut United
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
1
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

FC Cincinnati II
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
0
5
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Connecticut United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

FC Cincinnati II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Connecticut UnitedLigaFC Cincinnati II
Average goals in match 3.383.25 2.69
Both teams scored 77%63% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 77%65% 54%
Clean sheets 8%21% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%75% 77%
Goal after half-time 92%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Connecticut UnitedGoalMiklos Barnabas TanyiAssist: Alex Monis
  2. Connecticut UnitedGoalAndreas Applewhaite
  3. Connecticut UnitedGoalDylan Lacy
  4. Connecticut UnitedYellow cardSteven Sserwadda
  5. Connecticut UnitedYellow cardErnesto Gómez
  6. Connecticut UnitedGoalMiklos Barnabas Tanyi

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Connecticut United 1 - 0 - 0 FC Cincinnati II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Cincinnati II
1 : 3
Connecticut United

FAQ

What was the result of Connecticut United vs FC Cincinnati II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Connecticut United 4:0 FC Cincinnati II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Connecticut United vs FC Cincinnati II?

Connecticut United score 1.54 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati II 0.92. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Connecticut United's matches and 38% of FC Cincinnati II's.

What form are Connecticut United and FC Cincinnati II in?

Over the last 5 games Connecticut United have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and FC Cincinnati II 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Connecticut United vs FC Cincinnati II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.