Connecticut United vs Inter Miami II: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Connecticut United vs Inter Miami II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Connecticut United play Inter Miami II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 20 September 2026.
Current form
Connecticut United: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Inter Miami II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Connecticut United scores 1.93 and concedes 1.85 goals per match. Inter Miami II scores 1.04 and concedes 2.48. League average: 3.33 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Connecticut United 78%, Inter Miami II 63%. Over 2.5: Connecticut United 81%, Inter Miami II 63%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Connecticut United has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.48. Connecticut United: 12.7 shots per match, Inter Miami II: 12.5.
Match halves
Connecticut United: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.85. Inter Miami II: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.41.
Goals by minute
Connecticut United: 31-45+ (11 goals). Inter Miami II: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Connecticut United | Inter Miami II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Connecticut United is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Connecticut United · 0.8 pts / match - Inter Miami II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Connecticut United is 86% better for: goals scored per match.
1.93 goals / match - Connecticut United · 1.04 goals / match - Inter Miami II
Connecticut United is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.85 goals / match - Connecticut United · 2.48 goals / match - Inter Miami II
Connecticut United scores in 85% of matches (23 of 27 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 27 matches).
Inter Miami II scores in 63% of matches (17 of 27 matches), while Connecticut United keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Connecticut United
Over / Under - Inter Miami II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Connecticut United is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.37 pts / match - Connecticut United · 1.04 pts / match - Inter Miami II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Connecticut United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Inter Miami II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Connecticut United
Inter Miami II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Connecticut United | Liga | Inter Miami II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.78 | 3.33 | ▲ 3.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 78% | 63% | • 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 81% | 66% | ▼ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 21% | ▼ 4% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 76% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 85% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
When do Connecticut United and Inter Miami II play?
Connecticut United face Inter Miami II on 20 September 2026 in MLS Next Pro. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Connecticut United vs Inter Miami II?
Connecticut United score 1.93 goals per game on average and Inter Miami II 1.04. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Connecticut United's matches and 63% of Inter Miami II's.
What form are Connecticut United and Inter Miami II in?
Over the last 5 games Connecticut United have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Inter Miami II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Connecticut United vs Inter Miami II?
The statistical background for Connecticut United vs Inter Miami II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.