Japan - J2 LeagueSapporo Atsubetsu Park StadiumData current as of 31 August 2026

Consadole Sapporo vs Omiya Ardija: match statistics

Consadole Sapporo vs Omiya Ardija: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Consadole Sapporo played Omiya Ardija in J2 League (Japan). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Sapporo Atsubetsu Park Stadium. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Consadole Sapporo: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Omiya Ardija: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Consadole Sapporo scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Omiya Ardija scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Consadole Sapporo 50%, Omiya Ardija 50%. Over 2.5: Consadole Sapporo 50%, Omiya Ardija 50%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Omiya Ardija has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.19. Consadole Sapporo: 9.5 shots per match, Omiya Ardija: 16.5.

Match halves

Consadole Sapporo: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Omiya Ardija: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Consadole Sapporo: 0-15 (1 goals). Omiya Ardija: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.30 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Omiya Ardija sit 4th and have won both of their league matches so far, while Consadole Sapporo have a record of 1 win and 1 loss. The visitors are clearly in better rhythm: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals in that run and averaging 2.4 points per game, compared with Sapporo’s 4 goals and average of 1 point. Away from home, Omiya score an average of 3 goals, with a conversion rate of 23%, compared with the hosts’ 2 goals and 15% conversion rate at home. However, Sapporo have very solid defensive numbers on home turf, having kept a clean sheet there, while their average xG against is just 0.85, so the match should not be one-sided. Omiya’s edge in current form and finishing efficiency gives them slightly better chances of winning.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for both teams to score is driven primarily by Omiya, who have averaged 1.8 goals over their last 5 matches and won 4 of them, while averaging 3.0 goals per game in the current campaign. Consadole have scored just 0.8 goals per match over the same period, but create chances worth an average of 1.48 xG, with their home xG reaching as high as 2.02 from 20 shots. Omiya’s defence have yet to keep a clean sheet this season, allowing opponents an average of 1.87 xG per match and conceding 5 goals in their last 5 league fixtures. The hosts are more solid defensively, conceding an average of 0.8 goals across their five most recent outings, but Omiya average 5 shots on target and 1.31 xG over this period. The low league BTTS rate of 35% limits confidence in the pick; however, the combination of the visitors’ attacking threat and Consadole’s high chance-creation potential slightly favours BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 2.45 goals is clearly above this line. In their last five matches, Consadole averaged 0.8 goals scored but created chances worth 1.48 xG, while Omiya conceded 1.0 goal per game during this period, with opponents recording 1.57 xG against them. Omiya are the more dangerous side in attack: they scored 1.8 goals per game in their last five fixtures, while their opponents averaged 1.0 goal against them. The hosts attempt as many as 20 shots per match, while the visitors record 5 shots on target, increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. The 2.5 line is much more evenly balanced, as only 20% of Consadole’s last five matches and 60% of Omiya’s fixtures went over three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Omiya Ardija have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.8 goals, while Consadole Sapporo have managed just 1 win over the same period, averaging 0.8 goals scored. The visitors held a lead at the break in 60% of their last five matches, compared with just 20% for the hosts, which strongly supports the scenario of Omiya taking the initiative in the first half. In their last five appearances, Omiya averaged 1.0 goal after half-time and did not lose a single second half, whereas Sapporo scored just 0.4 goals after the interval. Although the hosts have the higher average xG, 2.02 compared with 1.63, their current efficiency and form are weaker; therefore, the most likely outcome is for the visitors to lead at half-time and secure a full-time victory: X/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
13Shots13
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
5Shots on target5
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
1.44xG1.39
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
7Corners3
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
38Dangerous attacks31
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
17Fouls12
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
1Cards2
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
1.5Goals scored / match2
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
1Goals conceded / match1
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
54%Average possession43%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
4Shots on target / match4
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match16.5
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
4Shots on target4
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
15.8%Shot conversion12.1%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
54%Possession43%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
1.19xG for1.83
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
1.18xG against1.54
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

Shooting quality

Consadole Sapporo: Efficient finishingOmiya Ardija: Counter-attacking
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
Accuracy (shots on target)42%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Omiya Ardija is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - Consadole Sapporo · 3 pts / match - Omiya Ardija

Consadole Sapporo
WL
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Omiya Ardija
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Omiya Ardija is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Consadole Sapporo · 2 goals / match - Omiya Ardija

Consadole Sapporo scoring profile: very strong

Consadole Sapporo scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Omiya Ardija keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Omiya Ardija scoring profile: very strong

Omiya Ardija scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Consadole Sapporo keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)4
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
2Goals conceded (season)2
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
2.5Average goals in match3
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
50%2 goals50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0%3 goals50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0%4 goals0%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
50%2 goals50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0%3 goals0%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0%4 goals0%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0%BTTS in both halves50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
50%Scored in both halves50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
50%BTTS - last 550%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Omiya Ardija is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Consadole Sapporo · 3 pts / match - Omiya Ardija

Consadole Sapporo - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Omiya Ardija - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)3
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
1Goals scored (1st half)1.5
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
1.5Average goals (1st half)2
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0%No goal before half-time0%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
1Average goals (2nd half)1
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija
50%No goal after half-time50%
Consadole SapporoOmiya Ardija

Consadole Sapporo - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Omiya Ardija - second-half results

0% W100% R0% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Consadole Sapporo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.50
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.51.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2
Omiya Ardija - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.00
Goals scored / match1.50.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal100%50%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals50%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Consadole Sapporo
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Omiya Ardija
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Consadole Sapporo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Omiya Ardija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
267%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Consadole SapporoLigaOmiya Ardija
Average goals in match 2.502.30 3.00
Both teams scored 50%35% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%35% 50%
Clean sheets 50%38% 50%
Goal before half-time 100%75% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%75% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.30
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
0.75
Away goals / match
+107%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+40%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Omiya ArdijaGoalYuta ToyokawaAssist: Mauricio Caprini Pinto
  2. Omiya ArdijaYellow cardYuta Toyokawa
  3. Omiya ArdijaGoalMauricio Caprini PintoAssist: Yusei Ozaki
  4. Consadole SapporoYellow cardTeerapat Pruetong
  5. Omiya ArdijaGoalToya IzumiAssist: Suphanat Mueanta
  6. Consadole SapporoSubstitutionOn: Tatsuya HasegawaOff: Kaito Konomi
  7. Omiya ArdijaYellow cardKota Nakayama
  8. Omiya ArdijaSubstitutionOn: Hajime HidakaOff: Toya Izumi
  9. Consadole SapporoGoalVinicius Silveira Peixoto

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Consadole Sapporo 1 - 0 - 1 Omiya Ardija. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Consadole Sapporo
1 : 0
Omiya Ardija
Omiya Ardija
1 : 0
Consadole Sapporo

FAQ

What was the result of Consadole Sapporo vs Omiya Ardija?

The J2 League match finished Consadole Sapporo 1:4 Omiya Ardija. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Consadole Sapporo and Omiya Ardija?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Consadole Sapporo won 1, Omiya Ardija won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Consadole Sapporo vs Omiya Ardija?

Consadole Sapporo score 1.50 goals per game on average and Omiya Ardija 2.00. The J2 League average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Consadole Sapporo's matches and 50% of Omiya Ardija's.

What form are Consadole Sapporo and Omiya Ardija in?

Over the last 5 games Consadole Sapporo have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Omiya Ardija 2-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Consadole Sapporo vs Omiya Ardija?

The statistical background for Consadole Sapporo vs Omiya Ardija — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.