Coquimbo Unido vs Audax Italiano: match statistics
Coquimbo Unido vs Audax Italiano: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Coquimbo Unido played Audax Italiano in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Coquimbo Unido: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Audax Italiano: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Coquimbo Unido scores 1.36 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Audax Italiano scores 1.36 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.64 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Coquimbo Unido 64%, Audax Italiano 36%. Over 2.5: Coquimbo Unido 55%, Audax Italiano 64%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Coquimbo Unido has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.14. Coquimbo Unido: 13.4 shots per match, Audax Italiano: 10.9.
Match halves
Coquimbo Unido: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.82. Audax Italiano: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.45.
Goals by minute
Coquimbo Unido: 61-75 (5 goals). Audax Italiano: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Coquimbo Unido holds a clear offensive advantage: at home they average 1.4 goals per match with average xG 1.79, while Audax Italiano scores only 0.6 goals away with xG 1.19. The hosts attempt 16.8 shots per game including 4.8 on target, with a shot conversion rate of 8%, whereas the visitors register 11.4 shots and 3.8 on target with a 5% conversion. Defensively Coquimbo concedes 1.2 goals per home match versus 1.8 conceded by Audax on the road, but both teams struggle defensively: in the last 5 matches each has conceded 9 goals. Additionally, Audax have yet to win an away match this season (win rate 0%) and have suffered 80% losses in away fixtures, while the visitors fail to score in 60% of their away games; the hosts meanwhile have a 40% home win rate and average 1.4 points per match in the last 5 fixtures compared to 1.0 point for Audax. Considering superior xG (1.79 vs 1.19), higher volume and quality of shots (16.8/4.8 vs 11.4/3.8) and the visitors’ poor away form, I tip Coquimbo to win; I estimate probabilities at 65% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 15% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes (70%) vs No (30%). The strongest signal is form: in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred for the home side in 80% and for the away side in 100%, and both teams conceded on average 1.8 goals in those fixtures, which significantly increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Seasonal indicators are more mixed — seasonal BTTS is 33% for Coquimbo and 40% for Audax, and the home side has 50% clean sheets; however seasonal xG is 1.1 for the home team and 1.19 for the away team, with seasonal xG against 1.33 vs 1.29, and in the last 5 matches xG stands at 1.17 vs 1.27 with xG against 1.50 and 1.39, meaning both teams create and concede chances. Offensively the hosts average 2.0 goals per game seasonally with a conversion rate of 19%, while the visitors average 0.6 goals per game seasonally (but 1.6 on average in the last 5), showing improved efficiency for Audax. Given the 80%/100% BTTS in form, the 1.8 average goals conceded and the similar xG figures, the 'both teams to score' scenario appears the strongest signal despite opposing seasonal data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.20 expected goals for Coquimbo (xG 1.10 vs Audax defense 1.29) and 1.26 for Audax (xG 1.19 vs Coquimbo defense 1.33), totaling 2.46 expected goals. At this total, a Poisson distribution yields roughly a 70% probability of at least 2 goals in the match (Over 1.5) and about 45% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5). Season data support this stance: Coquimbo has Over 1.5 in 67% of matches, Audax in 60%, and in the last 5 meetings both teams produced Over 2.5 in 80% of games. Additionally, Coquimbo averages 2.0 goals at home with a 19% conversion rate, while Audax averages 0.6 goals away with a 5% conversion rate, which increases the likelihood of home goals; therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Coquimbo holds a clear offensive and statistical advantage: the home side averages 2.0 goals per match versus 0.6 for Audax, and the home win rate is 50% compared to 0% for the visitors. In the first half the hosts have scored 13 goals (1.33 per first half) versus 5 for the visitors (0.4), and the hosts led at the break in 33% of matches versus 20% for Audax, indicating an advantage already at Half-Time. Additionally, Audax failed to score in 60% of the season’s matches while Coquimbo kept a clean sheet in 50% of games, so a scenario with the visitors not scoring is common. xG is comparable (1.10 for Coquimbo vs 1.19 for Audax), but the hosts’ shot conversion rate is 19% versus 5% for the visitors, pointing to greater clinical finishing from Coquimbo; this supports selecting the home team to lead at the break and win Full-Time (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Coquimbo Unido | Audax Italiano | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Coquimbo Unido is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Coquimbo Unido · 0.8 pts / match - Audax Italiano
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Coquimbo Unido is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - Coquimbo Unido · 1.45 goals / match - Audax Italiano
Coquimbo Unido scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Audax Italiano keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).
Audax Italiano scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Coquimbo Unido keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Coquimbo Unido
Over / Under - Audax Italiano
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Coquimbo Unido is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / match - Coquimbo Unido · 1.18 pts / match - Audax Italiano
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Coquimbo Unido - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Audax Italiano - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Coquimbo Unido
Audax Italiano
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Coquimbo Unido | Liga | Audax Italiano | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.73 | 2.64 | ▲ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 45% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 50% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 30% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 70% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 76% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Audax ItalianoYellow cardIgnacio Alexander Fuenzalida Contreras
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Coquimbo Unido 2 - 0 - 0 Audax Italiano. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Coquimbo Unido vs Audax Italiano?
The Primera División match finished Coquimbo Unido 3:0 Audax Italiano. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Coquimbo Unido and Audax Italiano?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Coquimbo Unido won 2, Audax Italiano won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Coquimbo Unido vs Audax Italiano?
Coquimbo Unido score 1.36 goals per game on average and Audax Italiano 1.36. The Primera División average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Coquimbo Unido's matches and 36% of Audax Italiano's.
What form are Coquimbo Unido and Audax Italiano in?
Over the last 5 games Coquimbo Unido have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Audax Italiano 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coquimbo Unido vs Audax Italiano?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.