Coquimbo Unido vs O'Higgins: match statistics
Coquimbo Unido vs O'Higgins: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Coquimbo Unido played O'Higgins in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 13 June 2026. Venue: Estadio Bicentenario Francisco Sánchez Rumoroso. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Coquimbo Unido: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. O'Higgins: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Coquimbo Unido scores 1.57 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. O'Higgins scores 1.46 and concedes 1.54. League average: 2.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Coquimbo Unido 64%, O'Higgins 54%. Over 2.5: Coquimbo Unido 57%, O'Higgins 54%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
O'Higgins has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.50. Coquimbo Unido: 13.7 shots per match, O'Higgins: 14.8.
Match halves
Coquimbo Unido: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.93. O'Higgins: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Coquimbo Unido: 61-75 (6 goals). O'Higgins: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I project a home win (1), given Coquimbo’s higher league position: Coquimbo 3rd vs O'Higgins 10th. In the last 5 matches Coquimbo are 3-1-1, scoring 10 and conceding 4 (2.0 goals per game, 2 points per game); O'Higgins are 1-1-3 with 6 scored and 8 conceded (0.8 points per game). Home side xG averages 1.78 with xG against 1.22 and an average of 1.67 goals scored; visitors on the road have xG 1.37, xG against 1.53 and average 2.2 goals scored and 2.2 conceded, indicating Coquimbo generates better offensive chances while O'Higgins show defensive weakness away. Coquimbo attempt more shots (16.33 vs 12.0) and slightly more shots on target (5.33 vs 5), but O'Higgins display higher efficiency (conversion 18% vs 10%), so the visitors still have realistic scoring chances despite poorer form. Considering the xG advantage (+0.41), lower average goals conceded for the home side (1.0 vs 2.2), and superior recent form and goals (10 scored vs 6 for the visitors in last 5), I estimate probabilities at 60% for Coquimbo, 25% for a draw and 15% for O'Higgins.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
O'Higgins presents a very strong BTTS signal: season BTTS rate 80% and an average of 2.2 goals scored and 2.2 conceded per match, which strongly supports both teams scoring. Coquimbo Unido has a season BTTS 38% and averages 1.0 scored and 1.13 conceded, but in the last 5 matches the home side averaged 2.0 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, and their xG_for 1.76 vs O'Higgins xG_against 1.53 suggests the hosts are also creating real chances. O'Higgins has xG_for 1.37 and 0% of matches without a goal this season, and both teams register a similar number of shots on target (5.38 vs 5.0), so both sides have opportunities to score. Additionally, low clean sheet percentages (25% and 20%) and the league average goals 2.74 with league BTTS 48% reinforce the BTTS scenario. Considering the above figures I assess BTTS probability at 72% (Yes) and 28% (No), therefore I pick 'BTTS - Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals estimate calculated as the average of each team’s attack and opponent’s defense yields 1.65 xG for Coquimbo ((1.76 + 1.53)/2 = 1.65) and 1.23 xG for O'Higgins ((1.37 + 1.10)/2 = 1.23), totaling 2.88 expected goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.88 translates to P(≥2) ≈78% (hence Over 1.5 = 78%), P(≥3) ≈55% (Over 2.5 = 55%) and P(≥4) ≈33% (Over 3.5 = 33%). Season data reinforce this: O'Higgins has seasonal Over 1.5 at 100% and Over 2.5 in 80% of matches, while Coquimbo has averaged 2.0 goals in the last 5 matches and records 60% of games over 2.5. Coquimbo creates more chances (avg. 16.5 shots and xG 1.76) while O'Higgins is more efficient with an 18% conversion rate, which together increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. For these reasons the strongest signal is Over 1.5 and I recommend betting the over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Coquimbo displays better form over the last 5 matches: averaging 2.0 points and 2.0 goals per match versus O'Higgins' 0.8 points and 1.2 goals over the same period. At half-time, the hosts in their last 5 matches average 1.0 goal and led at the break in 40% of games, while the visitors average 0.6 goals by half-time and only 20% leads in their last 5. xG favors Coquimbo 1.76 to 1.37, and the hosts average 16.5 shots (5.38 on target) versus O'Higgins' 12.0 (5.0 on target), indicating an advantage in chance creation despite the visitors' higher finishing rate (18% vs 6%). Seasonally O'Higgins have indeed led at the break in 40% of matches, but that seasonal stat is not supported by recent form (20% in the last 5), so the most consistent signal from the data is a host lead at half-time and a Coquimbo victory at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Coquimbo Unido | O'Higgins | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Coquimbo Unido is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Coquimbo Unido · 1.2 pts / match - O'Higgins
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Coquimbo Unido is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
1.57 goals / match - Coquimbo Unido · 1.46 goals / match - O'Higgins
Coquimbo Unido is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - Coquimbo Unido · 1.54 goals / match - O'Higgins
Coquimbo Unido scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while O'Higgins keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
O'Higgins scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Coquimbo Unido keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Coquimbo Unido
Over / Under - O'Higgins
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Coquimbo Unido is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.57 pts / match - Coquimbo Unido · 1.31 pts / match - O'Higgins
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Coquimbo Unido - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
O'Higgins - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Coquimbo Unido
O'Higgins
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Coquimbo Unido | Liga | O'Higgins | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.86 | 2.73 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 48% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 52% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 29% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 71% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 75% | ▲ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Coquimbo Unido 2 - 0 - 0 O'Higgins. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Coquimbo Unido vs O'Higgins?
The Primera División match finished Coquimbo Unido 0:0 O'Higgins. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Coquimbo Unido and O'Higgins?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Coquimbo Unido won 2, O'Higgins won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Coquimbo Unido vs O'Higgins?
Coquimbo Unido score 1.57 goals per game on average and O'Higgins 1.46. The Primera División average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Coquimbo Unido's matches and 54% of O'Higgins's.
What form are Coquimbo Unido and O'Higgins in?
Over the last 5 games Coquimbo Unido have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and O'Higgins 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coquimbo Unido vs O'Higgins?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.