United States - USL League OneData current as of 07 September 2026

Corpus Christi vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics

Corpus Christi vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Corpus Christi played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 4 July 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Corpus Christi: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Corpus Christi scores 1.20 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.91 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Corpus Christi 67%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 55%. Over 2.5: Corpus Christi 67%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 64%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Chattanooga Red Wolves has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.29. Corpus Christi: 10.6 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 12.4.

Match halves

Corpus Christi: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.73. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Corpus Christi: 76-90+ (6 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Corpus Christi has strong home metrics: on average 1.57 goals scored per match, 5 shots on target per game and a shooting accuracy of 13%, while at home they record 43% wins, 43% draws and only 14% losses. Chattanooga away averages 1.4 goals, 3.8 SOT per match with 12% accuracy and concedes 1.6 goals on the road, having kept 0% clean sheets away. Quality-of-chances comparison shows a slight home edge in xG: 1.47 xG for Corpus versus 1.37 xG for the visitors away, and the hosts also produce more SOT (5 vs 3.8). However, in the form over the last 5 matches the visitors look better — Chattanooga have scored 8 goals and sit on a 3-1-1 record (2.0 pts/match), while Corpus have 6 goals and a 2-1-2 record (1.4 pts/match). Considering the hosts’ 43% clean sheets, lower average goals conceded at home (1.14 vs 1.6) and the advantage in xG and SOT, I give the hosts the higher probability, although a draw remains a realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Chattanooga Red Wolves have a season BTTS rate of 80% versus only 33% for Corpus Christi, a strong signal that the visitors regularly participate in matches where both teams score (80% vs 33%). Conversely, Corpus records 50% clean sheets and concedes on average 0.83 goals per game, while Chattanooga has 0% clean sheets and concedes 1.6 on average, giving the home side a clear defensive advantage (50% clean sheets vs 0%; 0.83 vs 1.6). xG values show Corpus creates more quality chances (attacking xG 1.62 vs 1.37 for Chattanooga), but the visitors allow significantly higher xG against (1.81 vs 1.38 for the hosts), which increases the likelihood that the visitors will score. In the last 5 matches Corpus scored 6 and conceded 6 (1.2 and 1.2 avg), and Chattanooga scored 8 and conceded 5 (1.6 and 1.0) with BTTS at 40% and 60% respectively, further favoring the both-teams-to-score scenario. In summary, the dominant 80% BTTS signal for Chattanooga, their lack of clean sheets and a league BTTS level of 56% make BTTS - Yes the preferred pick as more probable (62% vs 38%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate 1.72 expected goals for Corpus Christi (attacking xG 1.62) and 1.38 for Chattanooga (attacking xG 1.37), giving a combined total of approximately 3.10 expected goals. At this total the Poisson model implies ~82% probability for Over 1.5 goals, ~60% for Over 2.5 and ~38% for Over 3.5. Match stats support these projections: the home team scores 2.33 goals per home game and averages 4.5 shots on target per match, the away team averages 1.4 goals and 3.8 shots on target; season Over 1.5 rates are 67% (home) and 100% (away), while Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 80%. Additionally the away side has BTTS in 80% of matches, and the home team converts shots to goals at 18% versus 12% for the visitors, which together increase the likelihood of clearing the 1.5 line—therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Corpus Christi score an average of 2.33 goals per match this season versus 1.4 for Chattanooga Red Wolves, while conceding only 0.83 goals on average compared to 1.6 for the visitors, which gives the hosts a clear advantage. xG values are 1.62 for the hosts versus 1.37 for the visitors, and the hosts’ defense allows 1.38 xG instead of 1.81 xG for the opponents; additionally, the visitors have not kept a single clean sheet this season (0% clean sheets), increasing the likelihood of conceding. Draws at half-time are frequent — the hosts were level at the break in 50% of matches, the visitors in 40%, and in the last 5 games the visitors were level at half-time in 80% of cases, so a draw after 45 minutes is likely. Second halves are key: the hosts score an average of 1.33 goals after the break versus 0.6 for the visitors and concede an average of 0.17 goals (visitors concede 0.8); additionally the hosts have collected 13 points in second halves versus 7 for the visitors and have won 67% of second halves, suggesting Corpus Christi will take the initiative after the break. For these reasons the most reliable signal is Half-Time draw and Full-Time home win (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
11Shots12
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
4Shots on target7
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
1.27xG1.62
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
2Corners10
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
40Dangerous attacks52
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
13Fouls16
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
3Cards1
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
1.2Goals scored / match1.91
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
1.67Goals conceded / match1.18
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
42%Average possession39%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
3.73Shots on target / match4.18
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.6Shots per match12.45
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
3.73Shots on target4.18
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
11.3%Shot conversion15.3%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
42%Possession39%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
1.29xG for1.51
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
1.6xG against1.57
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

Shooting quality

Corpus Christi: BalancedChattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attacking
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
Accuracy (shots on target)35%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Corpus Christi · 2.4 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Corpus Christi
WWWDL
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Chattanooga Red Wolves
WLWWW
Season result split
55% W9% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-4
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Corpus Christi · 1.91 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - Corpus Christi · 1.18 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Corpus Christi scoring profile: very strong

Corpus Christi scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Corpus Christi keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

18Goals scored (season)21
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
25Goals conceded (season)13
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
2.87Average goals in match3.09
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
9Goals scored (last 5)12
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal82%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
27%2 goals64%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
13%3 goals18%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
7%4 goals18%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal73%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
60%2 goals36%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
20%3 goals9%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
7%4 goals0%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 11 matches
57%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time36%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
20%Scored in both halves36%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
60%BTTS - last 540%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time55%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 94% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - Corpus Christi · 1.55 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Corpus Christi - half-time state
13% leading40% draw47% trailing
Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
36% leading45% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)1.55
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.91
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
1.27Average goals (1st half)1.64
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
47%Clean sheet before half-time45%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
60%No goal before half-time45%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.82
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)1
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.45
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
33%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves
47%No goal after half-time36%
Corpus ChristiChattanooga Red Wolves

Corpus Christi - second-half results

20% W53% R27% P
12
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

55% W18% R27% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Corpus Christi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.20
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Corpus Christi
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
1
3
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
3
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Corpus Christi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.79
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
169%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Corpus ChristiLigaChattanooga Red Wolves
Average goals in match 2.872.89 3.09
Both teams scored 67%57% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%59% 64%
Clean sheets 27%25% 27%
Goal before half-time 67%73% 73%
Goal after half-time 73%81% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+57%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defence advantage
+32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Corpus ChristiGoalJake KeeganAssist: Ignacio Pou
  2. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardMatthew Acosta
  3. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalAngelo Kelly-RosalesAssist: Joshua Ramos
  4. Corpus ChristiSubstitutionOn: Enock KwakwaOff: Jackson Dietrich
  5. Corpus ChristiYellow cardArthur Medina
  6. Corpus ChristiSubstitutionOn: Javier MarionaOff: Ignacio Pou
  7. Corpus ChristiYellow cardSam Roscoe-Byrne
  8. Corpus ChristiGoalBlake BowenAssist: Javier Mariona
  9. Corpus ChristiSubstitutionOn: Ronald Alexis Cerritos CastañedaOff: Jake Keegan
  10. Corpus ChristiYellow cardEnock Kwakwa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Corpus Christi vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

The USL League One match finished Corpus Christi 2:1 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Corpus Christi vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

Corpus Christi score 1.20 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.91. The USL League One average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Corpus Christi's matches and 55% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.

What form are Corpus Christi and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?

Over the last 5 games Corpus Christi have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Corpus Christi vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

The statistical background for Corpus Christi vs Chattanooga Red Wolves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.