Mexico - Ascenso MXEstadio Olímpico Ing. Marte R. GómezData current as of 01 September 2026

Correcaminos UAT vs Durango: match statistics

Correcaminos UAT crest
Correcaminos UAT
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Durango crest
Durango

Correcaminos UAT vs Durango: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Correcaminos UAT played Durango in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Olímpico Ing. Marte R. Gómez. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Correcaminos UAT: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Durango: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Correcaminos UAT scores 2.80 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Durango scores 0.60 and concedes 1.40. League average: 3.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Correcaminos UAT 100%, Durango 20%. Over 2.5: Correcaminos UAT 100%, Durango 40%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Correcaminos UAT has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.27. Correcaminos UAT: 12.6 shots per match, Durango: 10.2.

Match halves

Correcaminos UAT: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.60. Durango: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Correcaminos UAT: 16-30 (4 goals). Durango: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ascenso MX: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Correcaminos UAT have the better record over their last five matches: 3 wins, a draw and a defeat, while Durango have won just 2 and lost 3. The hosts are clearly more efficient, averaging 2.5 goals at home with a 20% shot conversion rate, compared with Durango’s 0.67 goals and just 6% efficiency away from home. Correcaminos also create more danger in the final third, recording 5.5 shots on target and an xG of 1.62 per match, versus 2.33 shots on target and an xG of 1.29 for the visitors. However, Durango defend solidly away from home, conceding an average of 0.67 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of such matches, which increases the likelihood of a closely contested game. The hosts’ weakness is their defensive record, with no clean sheets and 2 goals conceded per home match, but their superiority in chance creation and finishing supports a Correcaminos UAT win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Durango’s poor finishing: the team averages only 0.67 goals, and just 0.6 goals across their last five matches. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their games, while BTTS has occurred in 0% of their matches this season and only 20% of their last five. Correcaminos are in a strong attacking run, scoring 2.8 goals per game in their last five outings, but Durango average just 2.33 shots on target and have a 6% conversion rate, limiting the visitors’ chances of finding a response. The hosts do concede an average of 1.8 goals in their last five matches; however, Durango’s low scoring output is a stronger signal than Correcaminos’ high BTTS rate of 100% over this period. The most likely scenario is therefore that Correcaminos score, while at least one team—primarily Durango—fails to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, Correcaminos averaged 2.8 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, with all of these games going over 2.5 goals. Durango, however, has a far more conservative profile: they have scored an average of just 0.6 goals in their last 5 appearances, and only 40% of their matches went over 2.5 goals. The teams’ average xG figures—1.49 for Correcaminos and 1.27 for Durango—point to a game with chances, but not necessarily an open contest leading to four goals. In addition, both teams have recorded 100% of their seasonal matches under 3.5 goals, making Under 3.5 goals the most reliable option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Correcaminos are showing significantly better current form: they have won 60% of their last five matches, averaged 2.8 goals, and held a lead at the break in 60% of those games. Over the same period, Durango have failed to lead at half-time even once, scored just 0.2 goals in the first 45 minutes, and lost 60% of their matches. The hosts have recently averaged 1.6 goals after the interval, while the visitors have managed only 0.4, strengthening the scenario of Correcaminos maintaining or extending their advantage. Although Durango have better full-season results, their current three-match losing streak and 1.4 goals conceded per game point to an advantage for Correcaminos. The most likely HT/FT outcome is therefore 1/1: the hosts to lead at half-time and win at the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Correcaminos UATDurango
8Shots11
Correcaminos UATDurango
6Shots on target2
Correcaminos UATDurango
1.19xG1.18
Correcaminos UATDurango
3Corners5
Correcaminos UATDurango
36Dangerous attacks47
Correcaminos UATDurango
17Fouls12
Correcaminos UATDurango
5Cards1
Correcaminos UATDurango

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Correcaminos UATDurango
2.8Goals scored / match0.6
Correcaminos UATDurango
1.8Goals conceded / match1.4
Correcaminos UATDurango
45%Average possession57%
Correcaminos UATDurango
5Shots on target / match2.8
Correcaminos UATDurango

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.6Shots per match10.2
Correcaminos UATDurango
5Shots on target2.8
Correcaminos UATDurango
22.2%Shot conversion5.9%
Correcaminos UATDurango
45%Possession57%
Correcaminos UATDurango
1.49xG for1.27
Correcaminos UATDurango
1.79xG against1.47
Correcaminos UATDurango

Shooting quality

Correcaminos UAT: Counter-attackingDurango: Balanced
Correcaminos UATDurango
Accuracy (shots on target)40%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.560.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Correcaminos UAT is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Correcaminos UAT · 1.2 pts / match - Durango

Correcaminos UAT
DWWLW
Season result split
60% W20% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Durango
WWLLL
Season result split
40% W0% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Correcaminos UAT is 367% better for: goals scored per match.

2.8 goals / match - Correcaminos UAT · 0.6 goals / match - Durango

Durango is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - Correcaminos UAT · 1.4 goals / match - Durango

Correcaminos UAT scoring profile: very strong

Correcaminos UAT scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Durango keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

Durango scoring profile: very strong

Durango scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Correcaminos UAT keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

14Goals scored (season)3
Correcaminos UATDurango
9Goals conceded (season)7
Correcaminos UATDurango
4.6Average goals in match2
Correcaminos UATDurango
14Goals scored (last 5)3
Correcaminos UATDurango
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
Correcaminos UATDurango

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal60%
Correcaminos UATDurango
100%2 goals0%
Correcaminos UATDurango
80%3 goals0%
Correcaminos UATDurango
0%4 goals0%
Correcaminos UATDurango

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal60%
Correcaminos UATDurango
40%2 goals60%
Correcaminos UATDurango
40%3 goals20%
Correcaminos UATDurango
0%4 goals0%
Correcaminos UATDurango

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

60%BTTS at half-time20%
Correcaminos UATDurango
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Correcaminos UATDurango
60%Scored in both halves0%
Correcaminos UATDurango

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Correcaminos UATDurango
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Correcaminos UATDurango
100%BTTS - last 520%
Correcaminos UATDurango

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
Correcaminos UATDurango
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Correcaminos UATDurango
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Correcaminos UATDurango

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Correcaminos UATDurango
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Correcaminos UATDurango
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Correcaminos UATDurango

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Correcaminos UAT is 233% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Correcaminos UAT · 0.6 pts / match - Durango

Correcaminos UAT - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing
Durango - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)0.6
Correcaminos UATDurango
1.2Goals scored (1st half)0.2
Correcaminos UATDurango
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
Correcaminos UATDurango
2Average goals (1st half)1
Correcaminos UATDurango
20%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Correcaminos UATDurango
20%No goal before half-time80%
Correcaminos UATDurango

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.6
Correcaminos UATDurango
1.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Correcaminos UATDurango
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Correcaminos UATDurango
2.6Average goals (2nd half)1
Correcaminos UATDurango
40%Clean sheet after half-time80%
Correcaminos UATDurango
20%No goal after half-time60%
Correcaminos UATDurango

Correcaminos UAT - second-half results

60% W20% R20% P
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Durango - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Correcaminos UAT - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.21.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match2.02.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Durango - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Correcaminos UAT
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
4
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
4
3
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Durango
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Correcaminos UAT

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
162%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Durango

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
40%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).

Teams vs league

Correcaminos UATLigaDurango
Average goals in match 4.603.22 2.00
Both teams scored 100%56% 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%61% 40%
Clean sheets 0%24% 40%
Goal before half-time 100%73% 40%
Goal after half-time 100%76% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.22
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.49
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
37%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DurangoYellow cardSergio Adrián Flores Reyes
  2. Correcaminos UATYellow cardTomás David Sandoval
  3. Correcaminos UATYellow cardWalter Oswaldo Ortega Valero
  4. Correcaminos UATRed cardGerardo Moreno Cruz
  5. Correcaminos UATSubstitutionOn: Jorge Armando Zapata GraciaOff: Duvan Sterling Mina Marquínez
  6. Correcaminos UATYellow cardWalter Oswaldo Ortega Valero
  7. Correcaminos UATSubstitutionOn: Joaquín De Jesús Estopier SarmientoOff: Bryan Mendoza Cruz
  8. DurangoSubstitutionOn: Carlos Sebastián Siqueiros NájeraOff: Jared Torres Alexis
  9. DurangoSubstitutionOn: Aldieri Joshua Valenzuela GarciaOff: Juan David Angulo Ortíz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Correcaminos UAT vs Durango?

The Ascenso MX match finished Correcaminos UAT 0:0 Durango. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Correcaminos UAT vs Durango?

Correcaminos UAT score 2.80 goals per game on average and Durango 0.60. The Ascenso MX average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Correcaminos UAT's matches and 20% of Durango's.

What form are Correcaminos UAT and Durango in?

Over the last 5 games Correcaminos UAT have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Durango 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Correcaminos UAT vs Durango?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Correcaminos UAT vs Durango: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.