Mexico - Ascenso MXData current as of 23 July 2026

Correcaminos UAT vs Tlaxcala: match statistics

Correcaminos UAT crest
Correcaminos UAT
2 : 1half-time 2:0
Tlaxcala crest
Tlaxcala
135%(2.70)
X35%(3.30)
230%(2.25)

Both teams are in poor form this season, suggesting even chances for any outcome. Correcaminos UAT has only a 13% win rate at home and a disastrous run of five matches without a win, conceding an average of 2.5 goals per match in home fixtures. Tlaxcala performs slightly better in their last five games with two wins, but wins only 13% of away matches and hasn't kept a single clean sheet. Both sides have similar xG values (Correcaminos 1.35 vs Tlaxcala 1.5) and a negative goal difference, indicating defensive issues on both ends. Considering the poor efficiency of both teams and their tendency for draws (13% for the hosts, 25% for the visitors), a draw seems the most likely outcome, though a slight home advantage could tip the scales in Correcaminos' favor.

Correcaminos UAT vs Tlaxcala: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Correcaminos UAT play Tlaxcala in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match date is 31 January 2026 at 04:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Correcaminos UAT: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Tlaxcala: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Correcaminos UAT scores 1.07 and concedes 2.21 goals per match. Tlaxcala scores 1.07 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Correcaminos UAT 71%, Tlaxcala 50%. Over 2.5: Correcaminos UAT 68%, Tlaxcala 50%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Tlaxcala has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.15. Correcaminos UAT: 9.1 shots per match, Tlaxcala: 12.4.

Match halves

Correcaminos UAT: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.71. Tlaxcala: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.54.

Goals by minute

Correcaminos UAT: 76-90+ (10 goals). Tlaxcala: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ascenso MX: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Both teams are in poor form this season, suggesting even chances for any outcome. Correcaminos UAT has only a 13% win rate at home and a disastrous run of five matches without a win, conceding an average of 2.5 goals per match in home fixtures. Tlaxcala performs slightly better in their last five games with two wins, but wins only 13% of away matches and hasn't kept a single clean sheet. Both sides have similar xG values (Correcaminos 1.35 vs Tlaxcala 1.5) and a negative goal difference, indicating defensive issues on both ends. Considering the poor efficiency of both teams and their tendency for draws (13% for the hosts, 25% for the visitors), a draw seems the most likely outcome, though a slight home advantage could tip the scales in Correcaminos' favor.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

26Possession (%)74
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
11Shots15
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
4Shots on target3
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
1.26xG1.74
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
3Corners6
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
39Dangerous attacks81
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
12Fouls8
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
3Cards4
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
1.07Goals scored / match1.07
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
2.21Goals conceded / match1.57
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
43%Average possession51%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
3.14Shots on target / match3.79
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.11Shots per match12.36
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
3.14Shots on target3.79
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
11.8%Shot conversion8.7%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
43%Possession51%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
1.15xG for1.5
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
1.79xG against1.47
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

Shooting quality

Correcaminos UAT: BalancedTlaxcala: Balanced
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Correcaminos UAT
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
18% W25% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-16
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-8
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Tlaxcala
DWLDD
Season result split
29% W36% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-10-10
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-8
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tlaxcala is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.21 goals / match - Correcaminos UAT · 1.57 goals / match - Tlaxcala

Correcaminos UAT scoring profile: very strong

Correcaminos UAT scores in 82% of matches (23 of 28 matches), while Tlaxcala keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).

Tlaxcala scoring profile: very strong

Tlaxcala scores in 64% of matches (18 of 28 matches), while Correcaminos UAT keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 matches).

30Goals scored (season)30
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
62Goals conceded (season)44
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
3.29Average goals in match2.64
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
14Goals conceded (last 5)5
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal64%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
21%2 goals29%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
4%3 goals7%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
0%4 goals4%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal75%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
64%2 goals46%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
39%3 goals25%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
18%4 goals7%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

71%
Correcaminos UAT - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.20 of 28 matches
57%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time18%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
4%BTTS in both halves4%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
7%Scored in both halves18%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
100%BTTS - last 520%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tlaxcala is 124% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.54 pts / match - Correcaminos UAT · 1.21 pts / match - Tlaxcala

Correcaminos UAT - half-time state
7% leading32% draw61% trailing
Tlaxcala - half-time state
29% leading36% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.54Points per match (1st half)1.21
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
1.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.21
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
25%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
68%No goal before half-time61%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
1.79Average goals (2nd half)1.43
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
29%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala
43%No goal after half-time57%
Correcaminos UATTlaxcala

Correcaminos UAT - second-half results

29% W25% R46% P
15
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-22
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding257%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tlaxcala - second-half results

21% W36% R43% P
34
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Correcaminos UAT - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.41.4
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tlaxcala - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Correcaminos UAT
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
2
7
16-30
2
16
31-45
6
7
46-60
4
6
61-75
10
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Tlaxcala
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
5
5
16-30
7
6
31-45
2
8
46-60
2
5
61-75
11
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Correcaminos UAT

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
196%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Tlaxcala

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).

Teams vs league

Correcaminos UATLigaTlaxcala
Average goals in match 3.292.85 2.64
Both teams scored 71%57% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%53% 50%
Clean sheets 14%25% 25%
Goal before half-time 82%74% 68%
Goal after half-time 93%80% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+53%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Correcaminos UAT 1 - 0 - 0 Tlaxcala. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Tlaxcala FC
0 : 2
Correcaminos UAT

FAQ

What was the result of Correcaminos UAT vs Tlaxcala?

The Ascenso MX match finished Correcaminos UAT 2:1 Tlaxcala. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Correcaminos UAT vs Tlaxcala?

Correcaminos UAT score 1.07 goals per game on average and Tlaxcala 1.07. The Ascenso MX average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Correcaminos UAT's matches and 50% of Tlaxcala's.

What form are Correcaminos UAT and Tlaxcala in?

Over the last 5 games Correcaminos UAT have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Tlaxcala 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Correcaminos UAT vs Tlaxcala?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.