Corvinul Hunedoara vs Chindia Târgovişte: match statistics
Corvinul Hunedoara vs Chindia Târgovişte: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Corvinul Hunedoara played Chindia Târgovişte in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 14 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Corvinul Hunedoara: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Chindia Târgovişte: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Corvinul Hunedoara scores 1.58 and concedes 0.63 goals per match. Chindia Târgovişte scores 1.58 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Corvinul Hunedoara 33%, Chindia Târgovişte 46%. Over 2.5: Corvinul Hunedoara 38%, Chindia Târgovişte 46%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Corvinul Hunedoara has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.49. Corvinul Hunedoara: 16.6 shots per match, Chindia Târgovişte: 11.6.
Match halves
Corvinul Hunedoara: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.88. Chindia Târgovişte: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Corvinul Hunedoara: 31-45+ (9 goals). Chindia Târgovişte: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga II: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1) – Corvinul Hunedoara sit top with 17 wins this season versus Chindia’s 11 and win 67% of matches at home. The hosts show markedly better defensive numbers: at home they concede 0.75 goals per game on average (15 conceded this season), while Chindia concede 1.5 goals away and 31 goals overall; in the last 5 matches the visitors have allowed 13 goals compared to Corvinul’s 4. In attack Corvinul record an average xG of 2.1 at home and 18.58 shots per game (6.42 on target), whereas Chindia have xG 1.38 away and only 10.33 shots (4.17 on target), so despite the visitors’ higher conversion (11% vs 9%) the hosts create far more chances. Form corroborates the advantage: Corvinul scored 6 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.8 points per game in that period, while Chindia also scored 6 but average only 0.6 points per game with 1 win and 4 losses in the last 5. Considering the higher xG, greater shot volume, 50% clean sheet rate for the hosts (vs 25% for the visitors), and superiority in results and defense, I assess probabilities as 68% for the home win, 18% for a draw and 14% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis favors the 'No' scenario (BTTS - No). Corvinul at home averages 2.0 goals scored per match (xG 1.60) and keeps a clean sheet in 50% of games, indicating a solid home defense. Chindia averages 1.17 goals per match for the season and concedes 1.5 goals per match on the season, but in the last 5 matches they concede 2.6 goals per match (13 conceded) and their last 5 matches had BTTS in 60% of cases. Season-long BTTS rates are 42% for Corvinul and 50% for Chindia, while the league features 59% of matches with a clean sheet, which reduces the overall probability of Goal/Goal. Additionally, Corvinul has conceded only 15 goals this season versus Chindia’s 31 conceded, so I consider the home side’s defensive advantage to increase the likelihood of a No Goal scenario (60% vs 40%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis supports an Over bet. The home team averages 2.00 goals per home game, the away team 1.17, while in the last 5 matches the visitors conceded an average of 2.6 goals per game. An xG-based model projects 1.64 goals for the home side (xG_for_home 1.60 vs xG_against_away 1.67) and 1.41 for the away side (xG_for_away 1.38 vs xG_against_home 1.44), total ≈3.05. A Poisson distribution with λ≈3.05 translates to roughly an 81% probability of Over 1.5 and about 59% for Over 2.5, and seasonal rates confirm high scoring frequency at home (92% of home matches with ≥1.5 goals, 58% with >2.5). Given these figures and the home side’s superior finishing (shot conversion 16% vs 11% for the visitors), the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The hosts led at the break in 8 matches (67%) and score an average of 1.25 goals by half-time while conceding only 0.33, indicating a strong tendency to hold a lead after 45 minutes. This season Corvinul has 58% wins versus Chindia’s 33%, a seasonal goals average of 2.00 versus 1.17 and xG of 1.60 versus the visitors’ 1.38, so maintaining the lead to full-time is likely. Additionally, the hosts average 12.58 shots per game and have a higher conversion rate (16% vs 11%), and they have scored 6 goals in minutes 46–60 versus 0 for the away side, suggesting the possibility of increasing the lead after the break. Considering 75% clean sheets for the hosts at half-time and the fact that BTTS in the first half occurs in only 25% of cases, the strongest signal is 1/1 (hosts lead at the break and win at full-time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Corvinul Hunedoara | Chindia Târgovişte | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Corvinul Hunedoara is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Corvinul Hunedoara · 0.6 pts / match - Chindia Târgovişte
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Corvinul Hunedoara is 105% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.63 goals / match - Corvinul Hunedoara · 1.29 goals / match - Chindia Târgovişte
Corvinul Hunedoara scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Chindia Târgovişte keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 matches).
Chindia Târgovişte scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while Corvinul Hunedoara keeps a clean sheet in 58% (14 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Corvinul Hunedoara
Over / Under - Chindia Târgovişte
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chindia Târgovişte is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.79 pts / match - Corvinul Hunedoara · 1.88 pts / match - Chindia Târgovişte
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Corvinul Hunedoara - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chindia Târgovişte - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 46%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Corvinul Hunedoara
Chindia Târgovişte
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Corvinul Hunedoara | Liga | Chindia Târgovişte | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.21 | 2.69 | ▲ 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 48% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 49% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 58% | 30% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 73% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 81% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Corvinul Hunedoara 1 - 0 - 0 Chindia Târgovişte. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Corvinul Hunedoara vs Chindia Târgovişte?
The Liga II match finished Corvinul Hunedoara 2:0 Chindia Târgovişte. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Corvinul Hunedoara vs Chindia Târgovişte?
Corvinul Hunedoara score 1.58 goals per game on average and Chindia Târgovişte 1.58. The Liga II average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Corvinul Hunedoara's matches and 46% of Chindia Târgovişte's.
What form are Corvinul Hunedoara and Chindia Târgovişte in?
Over the last 5 games Corvinul Hunedoara have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Chindia Târgovişte 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Corvinul Hunedoara vs Chindia Târgovişte?
The statistical background for Corvinul Hunedoara vs Chindia Târgovişte — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.