Corvinul Hunedoara vs CS U Craiova: match statistics
Corvinul Hunedoara vs CS U Craiova: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Corvinul Hunedoara played CS U Craiova in Liga I (Romania). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Corvinul Hunedoara: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. CS U Craiova: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Corvinul Hunedoara scores 1.00 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. CS U Craiova scores 2.25 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Corvinul Hunedoara 25%, CS U Craiova 50%. Over 2.5: Corvinul Hunedoara 25%, CS U Craiova 63%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
CS U Craiova has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.73. Corvinul Hunedoara: 15.9 shots per match, CS U Craiova: 18.9.
Match halves
Corvinul Hunedoara: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.63. CS U Craiova: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.75.
Goals by minute
Corvinul Hunedoara: 61-75 (3 goals). CS U Craiova: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga I: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Corvinul Hunedoara remain unbeaten at home: they have won 50% of their home matches, drawn the remaining 50%, and average 2 goals per game while conceding just 0.5. The hosts also create more chances at their own stadium, averaging 18 shots and an xG of 1.96, whereas Craiova post an xG of 1.45 away from home and score just 1 goal on average. CS U Craiova sit higher in the table and have scored 10 goals in their last five matches, but their away form is a clear problem: they have not won any of those fixtures, concede an average of 2.33 goals, and have failed to keep a clean sheet. Corvinul also have an ongoing run of scoring in every home match, which, combined with the visitors’ weak away defence, gives the hosts the best chance of securing a narrow victory. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as Craiova have drawn 67% of their away matches; however, the home advantage favours the Hunedoara side.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The scenario of both teams scoring is primarily supported by the visitors’ very weak defense: CS U Craiova have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches, conceding an average of 2.33 goals, while Corvinul score an average of 3.0 goals at home. The hosts should create plenty of chances, as their average xG stands at 2.38 compared with Craiova’s 1.62 xG conceded, and they also average 7.4 shots on target per match. For the visitors, their current attacking form is crucial: in their last 5 matches, they scored an average of 2.0 goals, generated 2.14 xG, and both teams scored in 60% of those games. Corvinul do have a 60% clean-sheet rate and only 20% BTTS across the season, but in their last five matches they conceded an average of 1.0 goal while allowing opponents 1.59 xG, increasing the chances of an in-form visiting side finding the net. Craiova’s 100% BTTS rate this season, combined with both teams’ superior attacking metrics compared with their opponents, makes the “BTTS - Yes” option more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as at least two goals have been scored in 80% of Corvinul’s matches this season and in all of CS U Craiova’s games. At home, the hosts average 2.38 xG and 7.4 shots on target per match, while their opponents have yet to keep a clean sheet away from home and concede an average of 2.33 goals. Current form also points to goals: Craiova have scored an average of 2.0 goals in their last five matches, with an average xG of 2.14. Corvinul have been less clinical recently, averaging 1.0 goals scored, but Craiova have allowed an average of 1.03 xG across their last five appearances, giving the hosts a realistic chance of finding the net. The projected total of 3.00 goals also suggests potential for higher lines, but Over 1.5 has by far the strongest support in the data for both teams.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Corvinul Hunedoara won 80% of their home matches, averaging 3.0 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded, while CS U Craiova have not won away from home and allowed opponents to score 2.33 goals on average. The hosts also have a clear edge in chance creation quality: their xG stands at 2.38 compared with the visitors’ 1.45, and they average 7.4 shots on target against Craiova’s 4.33. At half-time, Corvinul were leading in 40% of their home matches, while their opponents conceded before the break an average of 0.67 times, supporting the possibility of the hosts taking the lead within the first 45 minutes. The strongest argument for them to maintain that lead comes after the break: Corvinul average 2.4 goals in the second half and win that period in 80% of matches, whereas Craiova concede an average of 1.67 goals after half-time and have not recorded a single win. The visitors’ last five matches have been better, however, with a 60% win rate and an average of 2.0 goals scored, so the scenarios of a draw at half-time followed by a home win in the second half retain a significant share of the forecast.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Corvinul Hunedoara | CS U Craiova | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CS U Craiova is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Corvinul Hunedoara · 1.6 pts / match - CS U Craiova
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CS U Craiova is 125% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Corvinul Hunedoara · 2.25 goals / match - CS U Craiova
Corvinul Hunedoara is 51% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.75 goals / match - Corvinul Hunedoara · 1.13 goals / match - CS U Craiova
Corvinul Hunedoara scores in 50% of matches (4 of 8 matches), while CS U Craiova keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 matches).
CS U Craiova scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Corvinul Hunedoara keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Corvinul Hunedoara
Over / Under - CS U Craiova
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CS U Craiova is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - Corvinul Hunedoara · 1.5 pts / match - CS U Craiova
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Corvinul Hunedoara - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CS U Craiova - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Corvinul Hunedoara
CS U Craiova
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| Corvinul Hunedoara | Liga | CS U Craiova | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.75 | 2.54 | ▲ 3.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 49% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 47% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 31% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 65% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 74% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Corvinul Hunedoara vs CS U Craiova?
The Liga I match finished Corvinul Hunedoara 0:1 CS U Craiova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Corvinul Hunedoara vs CS U Craiova?
Corvinul Hunedoara score 1.00 goals per game on average and CS U Craiova 2.25. The Liga I average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Corvinul Hunedoara's matches and 50% of CS U Craiova's.
What form are Corvinul Hunedoara and CS U Craiova in?
Over the last 5 games Corvinul Hunedoara have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and CS U Craiova 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Corvinul Hunedoara vs CS U Craiova?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


