Cove Rangers vs Queen of the South: match statistics
Queen of the South display significantly better form and statistics than Cove Rangers. The hosts occupy 9th place in the table with just a 10% home win rate and as many as 70% of home matches in which they failed to score. Their form in the last 5 home matches is disastrous (L, D, L, L, L, L, W, D, L, D), and their goal difference in home matches is -7. Queen of the South, in 4th place in the table, have a much better away record - 36% wins and only 45% losses away from home, with an average of 1.18 goals scored per away match. The visitors also have a higher shot conversion rate (14% vs 5%) and better clean sheets (36% vs 20%). Although the visitors' recent form is mixed (L, L, W, W, D), their overall statistical and qualitative advantage over the weak hosts points to a Queen of the South victory.
Cove Rangers vs Queen of the South: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cove Rangers played Queen of the South in League One (Scotland). The match was played on 7 February 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Cove Rangers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Queen of the South: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cove Rangers scores 1.05 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Queen of the South scores 1.61 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.66 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cove Rangers 36%, Queen of the South 43%. Over 2.5: Cove Rangers 45%, Queen of the South 52%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Queen of the South has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.25. Cove Rangers: 9.6 shots per match, Queen of the South: 10.6.
Match halves
Cove Rangers: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.59. Queen of the South: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Cove Rangers: 76-90+ (7 goals). Queen of the South: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Queen of the South display significantly better form and statistics than Cove Rangers. The hosts occupy 9th place in the table with just a 10% home win rate and as many as 70% of home matches in which they failed to score. Their form in the last 5 home matches is disastrous (L, D, L, L, L, L, W, D, L, D), and their goal difference in home matches is -7. Queen of the South, in 4th place in the table, have a much better away record - 36% wins and only 45% losses away from home, with an average of 1.18 goals scored per away match. The visitors also have a higher shot conversion rate (14% vs 5%) and better clean sheets (36% vs 20%). Although the visitors' recent form is mixed (L, L, W, W, D), their overall statistical and qualitative advantage over the weak hosts points to a Queen of the South victory.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cove Rangers | Queen of the South | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Queen of the South is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Cove Rangers · 2 pts / match - Queen of the South
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Queen of the South is 53% better for: goals scored per match.
1.05 goals / match - Cove Rangers · 1.61 goals / match - Queen of the South
Queen of the South is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - Cove Rangers · 1.22 goals / match - Queen of the South
Cove Rangers scores in 45% of matches (10 of 22 matches), while Queen of the South keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).
Queen of the South scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Cove Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cove Rangers
Over / Under - Queen of the South
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Queen of the South is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - Cove Rangers · 1.48 pts / match - Queen of the South
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cove Rangers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Queen of the South - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cove Rangers
Queen of the South
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Cove Rangers | Liga | Queen of the South | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.41 | 2.66 | ▲ 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 44% | • 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 53% | • 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 32% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 72% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 80% | ▲ 96% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Cove Rangers 0 - 1 - 1 Queen of the South. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cove Rangers vs Queen of the South?
The League One match finished Cove Rangers 1:1 Queen of the South. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cove Rangers and Queen of the South?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cove Rangers won 0, Queen of the South won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cove Rangers vs Queen of the South?
Cove Rangers score 1.05 goals per game on average and Queen of the South 1.61. The League One average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Cove Rangers's matches and 43% of Queen of the South's.
What form are Cove Rangers and Queen of the South in?
Over the last 5 games Cove Rangers have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Queen of the South 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cove Rangers vs Queen of the South?
The statistical background for Cove Rangers vs Queen of the South — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


