CR Belouizdad vs USM Khenchela: match statistics
CR Belouizdad vs USM Khenchela: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CR Belouizdad played USM Khenchela in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The match was played on 24 April 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
CR Belouizdad: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. USM Khenchela: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
CR Belouizdad scores 1.59 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. USM Khenchela scores 1.16 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.18 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CR Belouizdad 50%, USM Khenchela 52%. Over 2.5: CR Belouizdad 41%, USM Khenchela 44%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 37%.
xG, shots and style
CR Belouizdad has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.37. CR Belouizdad: 12.6 shots per match, USM Khenchela: 10.2.
Match halves
CR Belouizdad: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.86. USM Khenchela: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
CR Belouizdad: 76-90+ (10 goals). USM Khenchela: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligue 1: 2.18 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 37%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win for CR Belouizdad, who have a clear advantage in chance creation: average home xG 1.87 versus visitors’ 1.26 away xG, and shots on target 6.83 vs 3.85. Offensively the hosts score 1.83 goals per home match with a 13% conversion rate, while USM Khenchela averages only 1.15 goals away with a 12% conversion; hosts also average 13.83 shots per game versus the visitors’ 9.31. Defensively the home edge is also evident: CR Belouizdad concede 0.92 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 33% of matches, with average xG against 0.88; USM Khenchela concede 1.69 goals away, have only 8% clean sheets and xG against 1.82. Recent form slightly favors the visitors — USM have won 3 of their last 5 and average 1.8 points per game in that period, while CR Belouizdad have 2 wins in their last 5 and 1.4 points — however the consistency of home statistics (home goal difference +11) supports the hosts. Considering the xG advantage (+0.61), higher shot volume and better home defence, the most likely outcome is a CR Belouizdad victory; a draw or an away win are less probable.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis favors 'no': CR Belouizdad concedes on average 0.67 goals per home match and has 42% clean sheets, while in the last 5 home games the hosts conceded just 2 goals in total (0.4 avg) and recorded 0% BTTS in that period. USM Khenchela as away team scores on average 1.15 goals per match and has a season BTTS rate of 62%, but concedes on average 1.69 goals away and has only 8% clean sheets, indicating vulnerability to conceding. xG comparison shows hosts with xG_for 1.5 versus xG_against_away 1.82 (average ~1.66 expected goals for the hosts), while visitors have xG_for 1.26 versus xG_against_home 1.1 (average ~1.18 for the visitors), meaning the visitors’ scoring chance is lower. Additionally, in the last 5 matches CR Belouizdad scored 10 and conceded 2, whereas USM Khenchela scored 7 and conceded 6, reinforcing the scenario that the hosts will keep a clean sheet. Considering these numbers, I assign a 70% probability to 'no' and 30% to 'yes', therefore I recommend the 'no' bet as the strongest signal from the available data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and expected goals averages I estimate 1.66 goals for the home side (xG attack 1.50 and opponents concede 1.82 on average) and 1.18 for the visitors (xG attack 1.26 and hosts concede 1.10), yielding a total of 2.84 goals. With a mean of 2.84 the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 77%, and this assessment aligns with seasonal Over 1.5 rates: CR Belouizdad 58% and USM Khenchela 92%. I estimate the probability of Over 2.5 at roughly 54%, supported by the last 5 matches — CRB has xG 2.03 and scored 10 goals, USMK xG 1.42 and scored 7 goals (17 total). The chance of Over 3.5 is substantially lower, around 31%, which is corroborated by seasonal Over 3.5 values: CRB 8% and USMK 15%. For these reasons I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 — it is the line with the strongest signal (77% projection) and the best risk-to-expected-return profile.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Belouizdad drew at half-time in 67% of their matches and scored an average of 0.58 goals in the first half while conceding just 0.25, indicating a solid first-half defense. USM Khenchela averages 0.62 goals by half-time but concedes 1.69 goals per match and has only a 31% away win rate, so any leads they obtain are often short-lived. Additionally, the home side has a higher xG (1.50) versus xG against 1.10 and collects an average of 1.67 points at home compared to 1.08 points away for their opponent, giving Belouizdad the edge in the second half. Based on these numbers the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win after the break. For that reason I assign the highest probability to the X/1 (Half-Time/Full-Time) outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CR Belouizdad | USM Khenchela | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 50% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CR Belouizdad is 33% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - CR Belouizdad · 1.8 pts / match - USM Khenchela
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CR Belouizdad is 37% better for: goals scored per match.
1.59 goals / match - CR Belouizdad · 1.16 goals / match - USM Khenchela
CR Belouizdad is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.77 goals / match - CR Belouizdad · 1.2 goals / match - USM Khenchela
CR Belouizdad scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while USM Khenchela keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).
USM Khenchela scores in 72% of matches (18 of 25 matches), while CR Belouizdad keeps a clean sheet in 41% (9 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CR Belouizdad
Over / Under - USM Khenchela
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
USM Khenchela is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - CR Belouizdad · 1.64 pts / match - USM Khenchela
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CR Belouizdad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
USM Khenchela - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CR Belouizdad
USM Khenchela
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).
Teams vs league
| CR Belouizdad | Liga | USM Khenchela | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.36 | 2.18 | ▲ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 41% | 37% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 31% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 62% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 72% | • 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CR Belouizdad 0 - 1 - 0 USM Khenchela. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CR Belouizdad vs USM Khenchela?
The Ligue 1 match finished CR Belouizdad 3:1 USM Khenchela. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CR Belouizdad vs USM Khenchela?
CR Belouizdad score 1.59 goals per game on average and USM Khenchela 1.16. The Ligue 1 average is 2.18 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 50% of CR Belouizdad's matches and 52% of USM Khenchela's.
What form are CR Belouizdad and USM Khenchela in?
Over the last 5 games CR Belouizdad have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and USM Khenchela 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CR Belouizdad vs USM Khenchela?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CR Belouizdad vs USM Khenchela: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


