CR Khemis Zemamra vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics
Statistical analysis points to a closely contested match with a slight edge for a draw. CR Khemis Zemamra occupies a lower position in the table (12th place) and has not won any home matches this season (0% Win%), although they have shown improved form recently with two wins in their last five games. Ittihad Tanger (7th place) demonstrates more consistent form with 50% draws away from home and a better points-per-game average (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG). A key factor is both teams' propensity for draws – the hosts have a 67% draw rate at home, while the visitors have a substantial 50% draw rate on the road. Additionally, both teams have an identical home goal difference (-1), which further confirms the balanced nature of this encounter. Considering the hosts' poor efficiency in front of their own fans and the visitors' defensive approach, the most probable outcome is a share of the points.
CR Khemis Zemamra vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CR Khemis Zemamra played Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 8 February 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
CR Khemis Zemamra: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
CR Khemis Zemamra scores 0.67 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.90 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.15 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CR Khemis Zemamra 44%, Ittihad Tanger 60%. Over 2.5: CR Khemis Zemamra 44%, Ittihad Tanger 30%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 36%.
xG, shots and style
CR Khemis Zemamra has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.18. CR Khemis Zemamra: 11.3 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 9.8.
Match halves
CR Khemis Zemamra: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.44. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
CR Khemis Zemamra: 46-60 (2 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.15 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 36%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis points to a closely contested match with a slight edge for a draw. CR Khemis Zemamra occupies a lower position in the table (12th place) and has not won any home matches this season (0% Win%), although they have shown improved form recently with two wins in their last five games. Ittihad Tanger (7th place) demonstrates more consistent form with 50% draws away from home and a better points-per-game average (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG). A key factor is both teams' propensity for draws – the hosts have a 67% draw rate at home, while the visitors have a substantial 50% draw rate on the road. Additionally, both teams have an identical home goal difference (-1), which further confirms the balanced nature of this encounter. Considering the hosts' poor efficiency in front of their own fans and the visitors' defensive approach, the most probable outcome is a share of the points.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CR Khemis Zemamra | Ittihad Tanger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ittihad Tanger is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.6 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ittihad Tanger is 34% better for: goals scored per match.
0.67 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 0.9 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger
Ittihad Tanger is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.56 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.2 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger
CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).
Ittihad Tanger scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CR Khemis Zemamra
Over / Under - Ittihad Tanger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ittihad Tanger is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.1 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ittihad Tanger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CR Khemis Zemamra
Ittihad Tanger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| CR Khemis Zemamra | Liga | Ittihad Tanger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.22 | 2.15 | • 2.10 |
| Both teams scored | • 44% | 45% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 36% | ▼ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 33% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 64% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 72% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of CR Khemis Zemamra vs Ittihad Tanger?
The Botola Pro match finished CR Khemis Zemamra 1:0 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CR Khemis Zemamra vs Ittihad Tanger?
CR Khemis Zemamra score 0.67 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.90. The Botola Pro average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 44% of CR Khemis Zemamra's matches and 60% of Ittihad Tanger's.
What form are CR Khemis Zemamra and Ittihad Tanger in?
Over the last 5 games CR Khemis Zemamra have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CR Khemis Zemamra vs Ittihad Tanger?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.