Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 07 September 2026

CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat: match statistics

CR Khemis Zemamra crest
CR Khemis Zemamra
0 : 1half-time 0:1
UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CR Khemis Zemamra played UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 9 June 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

CR Khemis Zemamra: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. UTS Rabat: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

CR Khemis Zemamra scores 0.95 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CR Khemis Zemamra 50%, UTS Rabat 68%. Over 2.5: CR Khemis Zemamra 50%, UTS Rabat 32%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

UTS Rabat has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.22. CR Khemis Zemamra: 10.1 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 9.0.

Match halves

CR Khemis Zemamra: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.73. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

CR Khemis Zemamra: 76-90+ (7 goals). UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.13 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CR Khemis Zemamra (8th) holds a clear edge over UTS Rabat (14th), reflected in season numbers: the home side have 8 wins versus the visitors' just 2. At home CR Khemis Zemamra concede on average 0.64 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 55% of games, while UTS Rabat concede 1.5 goals on average away and have recorded no clean sheets. Offensively the sides are comparable — hosts score 0.82 goals at home with an xG of 1.15, visitors score 1.1 goals away with an xG of 1.37; the visitors register more shots on target (4.2 vs 2.55) and have an 11% conversion rate versus the hosts' 9%. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 5 goals and recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 points per game), whereas the visitors also scored 5 goals but lost 3 of 5 and average only 0.8 points per game, which favors the home side. Given the markedly better defense (0.64 vs 1.5 goals conceded) and superior points tempo, I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are 67% for CR Khemis Zemamra and 70% for UTS Rabat (average 68.5%), clearly above the league average of 51% and indicating a propensity for both teams to feature in goal-heavy matches. Both sides concede an average of 1.5 goals per season while scoring 0.92 (home) and 1.10 (away), so each has a realistic ability to register at least one goal. Shot and xG metrics confirm this: the visitors average 4.2 shots on target with xG 1.37 and xG against 1.47; the hosts 3.17 shots on target with xG 1.13 and xG against 1.46, which yields scoring opportunities for both sides. The last 5 matches reduce the BTTS signal to 40% for both teams, with the hosts conceding 0.6 goals on average in the last 5 and the visitors 1.6; nonetheless, low seasonal clean sheet percentages (8% and 0%) strengthen the both-teams-to-score scenario. Consequently, I view BTTS = Yes as the stronger signal, hence a forecast of approximately 65% for YES and 35% for NO.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis: CR Khemis Zemamra’s attack has xG_for 1.13 while UTS Rabat’s defense concedes 1.47 xG, yielding ~1.30 expected goals for the home side; likewise UTS has xG_for 1.37 against the home defense conceding 1.46 xG, giving ~1.42 for the away side; total 2.72 goals. Poisson distribution with lambda=2.72 gives ~76% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~51% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~29% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal metrics confirm a scoring propensity: Over 1.5 occurred in 83% of home matches and 80% of away matches, while BTTS appears in 67% and 70% respectively; additionally UTS averages 4.2 shots on target versus 3.17 for the home side and has conceded 8 goals in the last 5 matches (vs 3 conceded by the home team). Over 2.5 is less clear (seasonal Over 2.5: 25% home, 40% away, while Poisson gives a borderline ~51%), and Over 3.5 looks risky (seasonal 17%/10% and Poisson ~29%). Therefore the strongest and most reliable signal from available data is Over 1.5 (higher probability ~76%, combined xG 2.72 and confirmation by seasonal 83%/80%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1). The hosts were level at the break in 8 matches this season (67%) and in 4 of their last 5 fixtures (80%), with an average of 0.5 goals each team by half-time, strongly favoring a deadlock after 45 minutes. In the second half the hosts show better form: in their last 5 matches they averaged 0.8 goals after the break compared to 0.2 for UTS Rabat and earned an average of 2.0 points in the second half versus 0.6 for the visitors, so the hosts more often seize the initiative after half-time. Season-long indicators are balanced (xG 1.13 for CR Khemis vs 1.37 for UTS, season scoring averages 0.92 vs 1.10), so a full-time draw (X/X) remains plausible, but recent form (60% wins for the hosts in their last 5 vs 20% for the visitors) shifts the edge toward X/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
10Shots12
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
3Shots on target5
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1.39xG1.48
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
7Corners4
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
75Dangerous attacks52
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
6Fouls14
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1Cards4
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.95Goals scored / match1
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1.18Goals conceded / match1.5
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
48%Average possession46%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
2.91Shots on target / match3.64
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.09Shots per match9
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
2.91Shots on target3.64
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
9.5%Shot conversion11.1%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
48%Possession46%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1.22xG for1.23
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1.35xG against1.47
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

Shooting quality

CR Khemis Zemamra: BalancedUTS Rabat: Balanced
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
Accuracy (shots on target)29%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CR Khemis Zemamra is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 0.8 pts / match - UTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra
WWDLW
Season result split
36% W23% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-9
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
UTS Rabat
LLLWD
Season result split
9% W50% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-9
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTS Rabat is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1 goals / match - UTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.18 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.5 goals / match - UTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra scoring profile: very strong

CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 matches).

UTS Rabat scoring profile: strong

UTS Rabat scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

21Goals scored (season)22
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
26Goals conceded (season)33
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
2.14Average goals in match2.5
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
5Goals scored (last 5)5
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal68%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
27%2 goals23%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
5%3 goals9%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal95%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
36%2 goals32%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
14%3 goals14%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0%4 goals9%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
CR Khemis Zemamra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 22 matches
50%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time32%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0%BTTS in both halves9%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
14%Scored in both halves14%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
40%BTTS - last 540%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTS Rabat is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 0.95 pts / match - UTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra - half-time state
14% leading45% draw41% trailing
UTS Rabat - half-time state
14% leading55% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per match (1st half)0.95
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.23Goals scored (1st half)0.5
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.77Average goals (1st half)1.23
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
50%Clean sheet before half-time45%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
77%No goal before half-time64%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per match (2nd half)1
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.27
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
50%Clean sheet after half-time36%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
45%No goal after half-time55%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results

36% W36% R27% P
19
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding257%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTS Rabat - second-half results

18% W45% R36% P
21
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding64%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CR Khemis Zemamra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CR Khemis Zemamra
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
8
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
5
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
2
11
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
5
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.31
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CR Khemis Zemamra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

CR Khemis ZemamraLigaUTS Rabat
Average goals in match 2.142.13 2.50
Both teams scored 50%50% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%38% 32%
Clean sheets 32%31% 5%
Goal before half-time 64%61% 59%
Goal after half-time 73%73% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.13
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / match
1.01
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. UTS RabatGoalMohamed Es Sahel
  2. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Koffi KonanOff: Mohamed Es Sahel
  3. CR Khemis ZemamraSubstitutionOn: Abelaziz El HamzaouiOff: Mohsine Moutouali
  4. UTS RabatYellow cardYounes Akharraz
  5. UTS RabatYellow cardTahar Ahmed Madeira El Khalej
  6. CR Khemis ZemamraSubstitutionOn: Anass El GhannoujOff: Abdellatif El Bajjani
  7. UTS RabatYellow cardYounes Akharraz
  8. UTS RabatYellow cardHoussam Bouelainine
  9. CR Khemis ZemamraYellow cardEl Yazid Faffa
  10. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Zakaria AiadaOff: Abdelhay El Forsy

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CR Khemis Zemamra 1 - 0 - 0 UTS Rabat. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

UTS Rabat
1 : 2
CR Khemis Zemamra

FAQ

What was the result of CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat?

The Botola Pro match finished CR Khemis Zemamra 0:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat?

CR Khemis Zemamra score 0.95 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of CR Khemis Zemamra's matches and 68% of UTS Rabat's.

What form are CR Khemis Zemamra and UTS Rabat in?

Over the last 5 games CR Khemis Zemamra have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and UTS Rabat 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.