CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat: match statistics
CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CR Khemis Zemamra played UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 9 June 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
CR Khemis Zemamra: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. UTS Rabat: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
CR Khemis Zemamra scores 0.95 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.13 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CR Khemis Zemamra 50%, UTS Rabat 68%. Over 2.5: CR Khemis Zemamra 50%, UTS Rabat 32%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
UTS Rabat has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.22. CR Khemis Zemamra: 10.1 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 9.0.
Match halves
CR Khemis Zemamra: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.73. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
CR Khemis Zemamra: 76-90+ (7 goals). UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.13 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CR Khemis Zemamra (8th) holds a clear edge over UTS Rabat (14th), reflected in season numbers: the home side have 8 wins versus the visitors' just 2. At home CR Khemis Zemamra concede on average 0.64 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 55% of games, while UTS Rabat concede 1.5 goals on average away and have recorded no clean sheets. Offensively the sides are comparable — hosts score 0.82 goals at home with an xG of 1.15, visitors score 1.1 goals away with an xG of 1.37; the visitors register more shots on target (4.2 vs 2.55) and have an 11% conversion rate versus the hosts' 9%. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 5 goals and recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 points per game), whereas the visitors also scored 5 goals but lost 3 of 5 and average only 0.8 points per game, which favors the home side. Given the markedly better defense (0.64 vs 1.5 goals conceded) and superior points tempo, I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 67% for CR Khemis Zemamra and 70% for UTS Rabat (average 68.5%), clearly above the league average of 51% and indicating a propensity for both teams to feature in goal-heavy matches. Both sides concede an average of 1.5 goals per season while scoring 0.92 (home) and 1.10 (away), so each has a realistic ability to register at least one goal. Shot and xG metrics confirm this: the visitors average 4.2 shots on target with xG 1.37 and xG against 1.47; the hosts 3.17 shots on target with xG 1.13 and xG against 1.46, which yields scoring opportunities for both sides. The last 5 matches reduce the BTTS signal to 40% for both teams, with the hosts conceding 0.6 goals on average in the last 5 and the visitors 1.6; nonetheless, low seasonal clean sheet percentages (8% and 0%) strengthen the both-teams-to-score scenario. Consequently, I view BTTS = Yes as the stronger signal, hence a forecast of approximately 65% for YES and 35% for NO.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis: CR Khemis Zemamra’s attack has xG_for 1.13 while UTS Rabat’s defense concedes 1.47 xG, yielding ~1.30 expected goals for the home side; likewise UTS has xG_for 1.37 against the home defense conceding 1.46 xG, giving ~1.42 for the away side; total 2.72 goals. Poisson distribution with lambda=2.72 gives ~76% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~51% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~29% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal metrics confirm a scoring propensity: Over 1.5 occurred in 83% of home matches and 80% of away matches, while BTTS appears in 67% and 70% respectively; additionally UTS averages 4.2 shots on target versus 3.17 for the home side and has conceded 8 goals in the last 5 matches (vs 3 conceded by the home team). Over 2.5 is less clear (seasonal Over 2.5: 25% home, 40% away, while Poisson gives a borderline ~51%), and Over 3.5 looks risky (seasonal 17%/10% and Poisson ~29%). Therefore the strongest and most reliable signal from available data is Over 1.5 (higher probability ~76%, combined xG 2.72 and confirmation by seasonal 83%/80%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1). The hosts were level at the break in 8 matches this season (67%) and in 4 of their last 5 fixtures (80%), with an average of 0.5 goals each team by half-time, strongly favoring a deadlock after 45 minutes. In the second half the hosts show better form: in their last 5 matches they averaged 0.8 goals after the break compared to 0.2 for UTS Rabat and earned an average of 2.0 points in the second half versus 0.6 for the visitors, so the hosts more often seize the initiative after half-time. Season-long indicators are balanced (xG 1.13 for CR Khemis vs 1.37 for UTS, season scoring averages 0.92 vs 1.10), so a full-time draw (X/X) remains plausible, but recent form (60% wins for the hosts in their last 5 vs 20% for the visitors) shifts the edge toward X/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CR Khemis Zemamra | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CR Khemis Zemamra is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 0.8 pts / match - UTS Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTS Rabat is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
0.95 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1 goals / match - UTS Rabat
CR Khemis Zemamra is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.18 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.5 goals / match - UTS Rabat
CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 matches).
UTS Rabat scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CR Khemis Zemamra
Over / Under - UTS Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTS Rabat is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 0.95 pts / match - UTS Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CR Khemis Zemamra
UTS Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| CR Khemis Zemamra | Liga | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.14 | 2.13 | ▲ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▼ 32% |
| Clean sheets | • 32% | 31% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 61% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 73% | ▲ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CR Khemis Zemamra 1 - 0 - 0 UTS Rabat. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished CR Khemis Zemamra 0:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat?
CR Khemis Zemamra score 0.95 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of CR Khemis Zemamra's matches and 68% of UTS Rabat's.
What form are CR Khemis Zemamra and UTS Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games CR Khemis Zemamra have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and UTS Rabat 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


