Crawley Town vs Grimsby Town: match statistics
Crawley Town vs Grimsby Town: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Crawley Town played Grimsby Town in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Crawley Town: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Grimsby Town: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Crawley Town scores 0.98 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Grimsby Town scores 1.46 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Crawley Town 46%, Grimsby Town 46%. Over 2.5: Crawley Town 44%, Grimsby Town 44%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Grimsby Town has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.46. Crawley Town: 13.4 shots per match, Grimsby Town: 13.9.
Match halves
Crawley Town: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.63. Grimsby Town: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
Crawley Town: 76-90+ (12 goals). Grimsby Town: 31-45+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Grimsby holds a clear advantage over the season: 17 wins versus Crawley’s 8, and a goal record of 57 scored and 43 conceded (goal difference +14) compared to Crawley’s 40-60 (goal difference -20), indicating greater offensive efficiency and consistency from the visitors. In single-match metrics Crawley create more at home — on average 14.25 shots and 4.7 on target with xG 1.57 and 60% possession — while Grimsby away averages 11.72 shots, 3.78 on target and xG 1.35 with 54% possession, so the hosts will likely have the initiative. At the same time Grimsby close out matches better on the road: 39% clean sheets versus Crawley’s 20% at home and a higher finishing efficiency 11% to 9%, meaning that when chances are limited the visitors can convert opportunities. In the last 5 matches Crawley scored 5 and conceded 2 (average 1.6 pts/match), and Grimsby scored 8 and conceded 5 (1.4 pts/match), so short-term form is comparable. Considering Grimsby’s seasonal edge in wins and goal difference and better away clean sheet rate, I rate the visitors’ chances of victory higher than the hosts’ win probability.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The data sends mixed signals: seasonally Crawley averages 1.62 goals, Grimsby 1.28, with xG of 1.84 for Crawley and 1.35 for Grimsby; meanwhile Grimsby concedes 1.41 xG per game and Crawley 1.01 xG. This suggests both teams can create chances and have a realistic scoring chance, yet seasonal BTTS rates are moderate: 48% for Crawley and 44% for Grimsby, both below the league average of 51%. The recent form is key: in the last 5 matches Crawley scored 1.0 and conceded 0.4 with BTTS at 20%, while Grimsby in their last 5 scored 1.6 and conceded 1.0 with BTTS 40%. Additionally the home side generates more threat at home (15.9 shots and 5.76 on target per game vs 11.72 and 3.78 for Grimsby), which increases the chance of a clean sheet. Considering the home side’s low recent BTTS (20%) and Crawley’s better defensive form, I favour the No (clean sheet expected) scenario at 60% over Yes (BTTS - Yes) at 40%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: the home side has xG_for 1.84 and xG_against versus the visitors of 1.41, yielding about 1.63 expected goals for Crawley; the visitors have xG_for 1.35 and xG_against at the hosts of 1.01, giving about 1.18 for Grimsby, for a combined 2.81 goals. Using a Poisson distribution with this mean, the probability of Over 1.5 is ~77%, Over 2.5 ~53% and Over 3.5 ~31%. Seasonal data support this view: Over 1.5 occurred in 62% of home matches and 67% of away matches, while Over 2.5 was 48% at home and 39% away; the league average goals is 2.53, so our 2.81 forecast is slightly higher. Additionally, Crawley creates more chances (on average 5.76 shots on target per match vs 3.78 for Grimsby) with a similar conversion rate (10% vs 11%), and Grimsby’s xG_for over the last 5 matches is 1.80, which also indicates goal involvement. As a result, the strongest signal from the data is the Over 1.5 market (line 1.5, side “over”) with a probability of 77%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time with Crawley winning the match (X/1). A half-time draw is supported by the data: the home side drew at the break in 48% of matches and the visitors in 50%, and in Crawley’s last five fixtures they failed to score before half-time (0 HT goals in the last 5). After the interval Crawley performs significantly better — averaging 1.0 goals in the second half and winning 52% of second halves, whereas Grimsby averages 0.39 second-half goals and wins only 22% of second halves. Additionally, seasonal xG and shots on target favour the hosts: xG 1.84 versus 1.35 and 5.76 shots on target per match versus 3.78, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround after the break; therefore X/1 receives the highest probability (29%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Crawley Town | Grimsby Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Crawley Town is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Crawley Town · 1.4 pts / match - Grimsby Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Grimsby Town is 49% better for: goals scored per match.
0.98 goals / match - Crawley Town · 1.46 goals / match - Grimsby Town
Grimsby Town is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.46 goals / match - Crawley Town · 1.1 goals / match - Grimsby Town
Crawley Town scores in 63% of matches (26 of 41 matches), while Grimsby Town keeps a clean sheet in 38% (15 of 39 matches).
Grimsby Town scores in 79% of matches (31 of 39 matches), while Crawley Town keeps a clean sheet in 24% (10 of 41 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Crawley Town
Over / Under - Grimsby Town
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Grimsby Town is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / match - Crawley Town · 1.33 pts / match - Grimsby Town
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Crawley Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Grimsby Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (14 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Crawley Town
Grimsby Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Crawley Town | Liga | Grimsby Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.44 | 2.53 | • 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 51% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 46% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 27% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 66% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 78% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Crawley Town 0 - 0 - 1 Grimsby Town. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Crawley Town vs Grimsby Town?
The EFL League Two match finished Crawley Town 0:2 Grimsby Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Crawley Town vs Grimsby Town?
Crawley Town score 0.98 goals per game on average and Grimsby Town 1.46. The EFL League Two average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Crawley Town's matches and 46% of Grimsby Town's.
What form are Crawley Town and Grimsby Town in?
Over the last 5 games Crawley Town have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Grimsby Town 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Crawley Town vs Grimsby Town?
The statistical background for Crawley Town vs Grimsby Town — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


