CRB vs Ponte Preta: match statistics
CRB vs Ponte Preta: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CRB played Ponte Preta in Serie B (Brazil). The match was played on 24 May 2026. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
CRB: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Ponte Preta: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
CRB scores 1.44 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Ponte Preta scores 0.78 and concedes 1.78. League average: 2.22 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CRB 67%, Ponte Preta 56%. Over 2.5: CRB 67%, Ponte Preta 56%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
CRB has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.37. CRB: 15.1 shots per match, Ponte Preta: 11.7.
Match halves
CRB: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.67. Ponte Preta: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
CRB: 16-30 (3 goals). Ponte Preta: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie B: 2.22 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CRB holds a clear form advantage: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 10 goals and conceding only 2, which translates to an average of 2.6 points per game in this period. Ponte Preta’s last 5 matches show a 2-0-3 record, with 5 goals scored and 11 conceded, and an average of 1.2 points per game over those five fixtures. In home metrics CRB averages 17 shots per match with 5.75 on target and 51% possession, while Ponte Preta on the road records 9.25 shots with 3.75 on target and 45% possession. Situation quality models also favor the hosts: CRB’s home xG for is 1.77 and xG against 1.12, whereas Ponte Preta’s away xG for is 1.12 and xG against 1.75, and the visitors have no clean sheets on the road (CS% 0). Considering the superiority in recent form, higher quantity and quality of chances, and the visitors’ weaker defence, I assign a 65% probability to a CRB win, 20% to a draw and 15% to a Ponte Preta win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick the “Yes” scenario — BTTS - Yes — because CRB has a seasonal BTTS of 60% and Ponte Preta 50%, both above the league average of 49%. Ponte away have recorded no clean sheets (0%) and concede on average 1.75 goals away this season; in the last 5 matches they concede 2.2 goals per game (11 conceded), which increases the likelihood of the hosts scoring. CRB in the last 5 matches average 2.0 goals (10 scored) and show xG_for 2.0 with xG_against 1.18 across those five games, while seasonal home xG_for is 1.56, so the hosts create chances exceeding Ponte’s defensive capacity. Ponte’s seasonal away goals scored is only 0.75 and seasonal xG_for is 1.12, limiting their offense, but in the last 5 matches their xG_for is 1.46 and they have 60% BTTS in those five games, so they can also find the net. Key signals are CRB’s 60% BTTS, Ponte’s zero away clean sheets (0%), and Ponte’s high percentage of matches over 2.5 goals (75%), therefore I assess BTTS at 62% vs 38% for “No”.}
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG for both teams is 1.56 + 1.12 = 2.68, which in a simple Poisson model yields roughly a 75% probability of at least 2 goals and about 50% for at least 3 goals. Seasonal rates support this view: CRB has 60% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Ponte Preta 75%, and both teams have 100% of matches with at least one goal. In the last 5 fixtures CRB averaged 2.0 goals scored (10 in 5 matches) and conceded 0.4, while Ponte conceded 11 goals in 5 matches and scored an average of 1.0, which increases the likelihood of a higher goal count. CRB generates more chances (13.6 shots and 4.6 on target) and has a higher xG 1.56 vs 1.12 for Ponte; conversion rates are 6% vs 8%, so despite lower efficiency CRB still produces dangerous opportunities. Therefore the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5 (prediction ~75%); Over 2.5 has a slight edge (~52%), whereas Over 3.5 is unlikely (~28%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 (CRB leads at the break and wins the match) — I assigned this a 34% probability because the home side won 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) and led at the break in 60% of those games (3 of 5). CRB’s offensive direction is confirmed by an xG of 1.56 versus Ponte Preta’s 1.12, along with an average of 13.6 shots versus 9.25 and 4.6 shots on target versus 3.75 for the visitors, which translates into greater chance creation. In the last 5 matches CRB averaged 1.2 goals by half-time, while Ponte Preta averaged 0.6, and the hosts conceded only 0.2 goals on average by half-time — this increases the probability of maintaining the lead after the break. The risk of an equalizer or a turnaround exists, since CRB concedes on average 1.0 goal in the second half over the season and Ponte Preta have had 50% of their season’s matches with both teams scoring, so I also assigned moderate chances to scenarios with a draw or an away win. In summary, the xG advantage (1.56 vs 1.12), higher shot volume (13.6 vs 9.25) and CRB’s dominance in the last 5 outings (80% wins, 60% leads at half-time) make 1/1 the strongest signal from the data.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CRB | Ponte Preta | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CRB is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - CRB · 1.2 pts / match - Ponte Preta
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CRB is 85% better for: goals scored per match.
1.44 goals / match - CRB · 0.78 goals / match - Ponte Preta
CRB is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.44 goals / match - CRB · 1.78 goals / match - Ponte Preta
CRB scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Ponte Preta keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
Ponte Preta scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while CRB keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CRB
Over / Under - Ponte Preta
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CRB is 149% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / match - CRB · 0.67 pts / match - Ponte Preta
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CRB - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ponte Preta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CRB
Ponte Preta
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| CRB | Liga | Ponte Preta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.89 | 2.22 | ▲ 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 48% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 42% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 33% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 58% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 76% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of CRB vs Ponte Preta?
The Serie B match finished CRB 4:2 Ponte Preta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CRB vs Ponte Preta?
CRB score 1.44 goals per game on average and Ponte Preta 0.78. The Serie B average is 2.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 67% of CRB's matches and 56% of Ponte Preta's.
What form are CRB and Ponte Preta in?
Over the last 5 games CRB have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Ponte Preta 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CRB vs Ponte Preta?
The statistical background for CRB vs Ponte Preta — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


