Italy - Serie AData current as of 11 September 2026

Cremonese vs Pisa: match statistics

Cremonese crest
Cremonese
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Pisa crest
Pisa

Cremonese vs Pisa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cremonese played Pisa in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Cremonese: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Pisa: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cremonese scores 0.77 and concedes 1.51 goals per match. Pisa scores 0.71 and concedes 1.80. League average: 2.40 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cremonese 43%, Pisa 43%. Over 2.5: Cremonese 43%, Pisa 49%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Pisa has higher xG: 1.12 vs 1.06. Cremonese: 9.2 shots per match, Pisa: 10.1.

Match halves

Cremonese: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.49. Pisa: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Cremonese: 76-90+ (8 goals). Pisa: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.40 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win. At home Cremonese concedes an average of 1.47 goals per match, while Pisa concedes 2.35 on the road; the hosts register 3.71 shots on target per game versus the visitors' 2.65. Cremonese also posts a higher home xG (1.19) than Pisa away (1.03), and the xG against differential (1.54 vs 1.85) together with 29% clean sheets at home versus 6% for the visitors indicate superior defensive organization by the hosts. Both teams are, however, low-scoring (Cremonese 0.82 goals at home, Pisa 0.94 away) and draws are frequent (41% draws for Cremonese vs 47% for Pisa away), which increases the risk of a point split. In the short term Cremonese has a marginally better form (0.2 points per game in the last 5 matches vs 0 points for Pisa), so I favour the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Cremonese has a seasonal BTTS 33% and Pisa 53%, averaging 43% versus the league 45%, so the baseline slightly favors Goal/Goal. Pisa concedes 2.35 goals per match on average with xG against 1.85, and Cremonese concedes 1.28 with xG against 1.37, indicating both sides allow a significant number of chances for opponents. In attack Pisa scores 0.94 goals and has xG_for 1.03, Cremonese scores 0.5 with xG_for 1.2, but Cremonese converts only 5% of shots versus Pisa’s 10%, which limits their effectiveness. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 2.0 goals and conceded 9.0, and BTTS in the last 5 matches is 40% for both, suggesting frequent goals conceded with low finishing. Considering Pisa’s high BTTS rate of 53%, Pisa’s very low clean sheet percentage of 6% and their high goals conceded 2.35, I favor the BTTS - Yes option and estimate BTTS at 58% vs 42% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and defensive analysis point to a moderately high goal potential: Cremonese xG is 1.20 and xG against vs Pisa is 1.85, yielding expected goals for the home side ≈1.53. For Pisa, offensive xG is 1.03 versus xG against vs Cremonese 1.37, translating to expected ≈1.20 for the away side; total ≈2.73 goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.73 gives P(Over 1.5) ≈76%, P(Over 2.5) ≈51% and P(Over 3.5) ≈29%. Support for Over 2.5 includes Pisa having 65% of matches this season over 2.5, Cremonese 33%, and both teams registering 60% Over 2.5 in their last 5 matches. Additionally, Pisa concedes on average 2.35 goals per game, Cremonese 1.28, with clean sheets at 6% (Pisa) and 22% (Cremonese); therefore I recommend Over 2.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1). Cremonese drew at the break in 72% of home matches, while Pisa were level at half-time in 41% of away fixtures — averaging roughly a 56.5% chance of a half-time draw. Cremonese scored on average only 0.11 goals before the break versus Pisa’s 0.53, so an HT 0:0 looks plausible, but many goals are scored after the interval: 72% of Cremonese’s matches and 76% of Pisa’s matches see second-half goals. Pisa concede an average of 2.35 goals per game compared with Cremonese’s 1.28 conceded, and the home side’s xG of 1.2 versus the visitors’ 1.03 suggests Cremonese have greater potential to break the draw and secure a turnaround to win after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

77Possession (%)23
CremonesePisa
10Shots0
CremonesePisa
6Shots on target0
CremonesePisa
1.55xG0.15
CremonesePisa
7Corners1
CremonesePisa
67Dangerous attacks19
CremonesePisa
10Fouls12
CremonesePisa
0Cards6
CremonesePisa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.77Goals scored / match0.71
CremonesePisa
1.51Goals conceded / match1.8
CremonesePisa
46%Average possession41%
CremonesePisa
3.26Shots on target / match2.91
CremonesePisa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.23Shots per match10.06
CremonesePisa
3.26Shots on target2.91
CremonesePisa
8.4%Shot conversion7.1%
CremonesePisa
46%Possession41%
CremonesePisa
1.06xG for1.12
CremonesePisa
1.77xG against1.61
CremonesePisa

Shooting quality

Cremonese: BalancedPisa: Balanced
CremonesePisa
Accuracy (shots on target)35%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cremonese
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W29% D54% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-10-19
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-8
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Pisa
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
6% W34% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-12-21
0.51 pts / match · goal difference -38
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-8-9
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cremonese is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

0.77 goals / match - Cremonese · 0.71 goals / match - Pisa

Cremonese is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.51 goals / match - Cremonese · 1.8 goals / match - Pisa

Cremonese scoring profile: strong

Cremonese scores in 51% of matches (18 of 35 matches), while Pisa keeps a clean sheet in 14% (5 of 35 matches).

Pisa scoring profile: mixed

Pisa scores in 46% of matches (16 of 35 matches), while Cremonese keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 35 matches).

27Goals scored (season)25
CremonesePisa
53Goals conceded (season)63
CremonesePisa
2.29Average goals in match2.51
CremonesePisa
2Goals scored (last 5)2
CremonesePisa
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
CremonesePisa

How often they score at least...

51%1 goal46%
CremonesePisa
20%2 goals23%
CremonesePisa
6%3 goals3%
CremonesePisa
0%4 goals0%
CremonesePisa

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal86%
CremonesePisa
46%2 goals51%
CremonesePisa
17%3 goals23%
CremonesePisa
11%4 goals11%
CremonesePisa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time17%
CremonesePisa
0%BTTS in both halves3%
CremonesePisa
11%Scored in both halves11%
CremonesePisa

BTTS and goal count

34%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
CremonesePisa
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
CremonesePisa
40%BTTS - last 540%
CremonesePisa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
CremonesePisa
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
CremonesePisa
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
CremonesePisa

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
CremonesePisa
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
CremonesePisa
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
CremonesePisa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cremonese is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.94 pts / match - Cremonese · 0.83 pts / match - Pisa

Cremonese - half-time state
17% leading43% draw40% trailing
Pisa - half-time state
9% leading57% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.94Points per match (1st half)0.83
CremonesePisa
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.31
CremonesePisa
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
CremonesePisa
1.06Average goals (1st half)1.03
CremonesePisa
54%Clean sheet before half-time54%
CremonesePisa
80%No goal before half-time74%
CremonesePisa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)0.74
CremonesePisa
0.49Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
CremonesePisa
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)1.09
CremonesePisa
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.49
CremonesePisa
54%Clean sheet after half-time31%
CremonesePisa
57%No goal after half-time69%
CremonesePisa

Cremonese - second-half results

26% W34% D40% L
33
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-17
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pisa - second-half results

11% W40% D49% L
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-24
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 6%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cremonese - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Pisa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cremonese
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
3
7
16-30
4
11
31-45
6
9
46-60
3
9
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Pisa
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
4
4
16-30
2
14
31-45
6
10
46-60
3
11
61-75
5
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
23%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
26%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cremonese

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.71
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Pisa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

CremoneseLigaPisa
Average goals in match 2.292.40 2.51
Both teams scored 43%45% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%45% 49%
Clean sheets 26%33% 14%
Goal before half-time 60%65% 54%
Goal after half-time 71%77% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.40
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PisaYellow cardRosen Bozhinov
  2. PisaYellow cardRosen Bozhinov
  3. CremoneseGoalJamie Richard Vardy
  4. PisaYellow cardArturo Calabresi
  5. CremoneseSubstitutionOn: Francesco FolinoOff: Sebastiano Luperto
  6. PisaYellow cardMalthe Höjholt

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Giovanni AyroldiMatches officiated: 10
4.8Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 230%Home wins30%Draws40%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Cremonese 0 - 0 - 1 Pisa. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

AC Pisa 1909
1 : 0
US Cremonese

FAQ

What was the result of Cremonese vs Pisa?

The Serie A match finished Cremonese 3:0 Pisa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cremonese vs Pisa?

Cremonese score 0.77 goals per game on average and Pisa 0.71. The Serie A average is 2.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Cremonese's matches and 43% of Pisa's.

What form are Cremonese and Pisa in?

Over the last 5 games Cremonese have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Pisa 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cremonese vs Pisa?

The statistical background for Cremonese vs Pisa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.